5th C Forum by Janette Nina

clim_janette_nina — 2018-04-19 14:53:23 UTC

BEING A THIRD CULTURE KID: A CURSE OR A BLESSING?

milagrospachecofalcon16 — 2018-04-19 19:15:20 UTC

My opinion is that being a TKC is a blessing, because you can travel to other country, learn more custom, tradition and believes. So, you can learn more language like English, that is the first language of the world. And this is a perfect opportunity for children because when they are more adult, they are going to find more jobs opportunities. Furthermore, you can have other style of life, and different thought about the life, and the target of the future, etc. allow to be open-minded. So you have more core skill, and this to be special and important person. So, you have less stereotypes, prejudice of the culture.

To conclude, being a TCK, is a blessing that the children TCK take advantage.

natally_espinoza11 — 2018-04-19 23:38:34 UTC

From my point of view, I’m partially with this question, because I think that TCK’s have a advantanges and disadvantages, for example TCK’s can be a curse, because they don’t have one identity, relocate a lot, they have a sterotype problems or maybe they don’t have a strong relationship with their friends or family because they travel constantly. But on the other hand being a TCK’s can be a blessingn, because they move a lot and know more about other cultures, also they are open minded, learn different languages, it’s simple they are world citizens.

hilary2004tlv — 2018-04-20 00:01:27 UTC

I agree with you Milagros and Lucero. Also, in my opinion the TCK´s are blessing given that permit to know about differents cultures and learn about these. For example, when a country have a economic problems, the people need to migrate to have a better quality of life and I think that for the TCK´s is more easy to adapt in other country given that they Know a lot of cultures, and they are open minded, that permit that they respect and valorate all the cultures, their traditions, customs, ideologies, etc. So, in this way, also they can prevent the stereotypes because they travel a lot and the TCK´s dont will create a mis conception of each culture because they are tolerants and empathics with other people and this can permit that learn different language. So, in general, TCK´s is blessing given that permit learn, know and strengthen our values. A testimony of TCK´s is Guille, he said " I was born in Cuba, I grew up in Panama and my parents are americans. This is fantastic, because I learned values of each culture and I have the ability to integrate more easy"

lucerocandarellano — 2018-04-20 00:03:56 UTC

CANDELARIO ARELLANO LUCERO
I believe that, be a TCK are blessing because it allows you obtain more information and knowledge about the reality of the world, also of permit travel to different countries and cities in that you can obtain more friends. The limit there aren’t. Your qualities of share and interact with other peoples increasing and have the capacity of learned a different language. Also in the future because you know the world, your job not is for one country, you work for the world.

gabyrayme19 — 2018-04-20 02:25:51 UTC

As far as I am concerned, about TCK I'm partially becuase it has advantages and desadvantages. Is a course because children don't have an identity and identity essencial because let us to express how we are. That problem begin on TCK when they relocate a lot, and that's for the parents' job, and this type of cases are increasingly. In add, I think that people tell them "phenomenon" given that each time they're traveling and don't have a home or identity, so maybe they have hopefully that perhaps one day they'll fine a home and identity, to evit that people tell them "phemomenon". Aditionally, parents expose them because sometimes they don't think how they are, and parents must to help them because for children is too hard to find their identity, culture, traditions, and home. On the other hand, TCK could be blessing because permit to children know more about other cultures, traditions, learn many languages and they'll open minded because they'll know the importance of cultures from each country, also they'll have a good behaviour and might they'll teach to other the importance of respect the world cultures. Finally, TCK could be a course because children will never be able find themselves: their identity, but in the other hand, they'll learn the importance of world cultures.

stefannyroque50 — 2018-04-20 21:22:17 UTC

Being a TCKs have some disadvantages however I found more advantages. So, for me will be a blessing to be a TCK, given that I will know different places around the world, so I will have a lot of friends. And, when I relocate to another country I will talk with them by a webcam. Also, if I can learn different languages, in the future I can have better job opportunities. Also, if I travel a lot I will be a citizen of the world, knowledgeable of world problems so in the future if I would like to be a political or diplomatic will be more easy solve problems. Besides, if I travel I can be more flexible and adaptable to situations of life. Furthermore, as consequence of the interaction with other cultures TCKs children don’t have stereotypes so they don’t contribute to racism and discrimination. Other advantage is that they are open-minded. Finally, I conclude that be a TCK is a blessing given that have many advantages.

13juddy_pena — 2018-04-20 23:56:33 UTC

From my point of view, I think that TCK can be curse or blessing, it depend of the perspective that you give it. Because, TCK have advantagse and disadvantages, in that sense, you decide if you consider it from the good or bad way. For example, one of advantage is that when you travel a lot you can know about new cultures and new tradition. So, you can prevent have a misconception of people. From other side, one disadvantage is that you sometimes you ask yourself Where are I from? and you doesn't feel confidence to establish long relationships.

claudiacosme1904 — 2018-04-21 00:46:02 UTC

From my point of view, I consider that TCK can be a blessing or a curse, it´s depend on the situations. So, they have a lot advantages and disadvantages for example, they can be adapted with more facility to another country and obviously to their customs, traditions, believer, etc. Also, TCK travel a lot and its benefit for their life because they have knowledge about different countries. But, they have disadvantages such as since they are complicated to identify what is their identity because they don´t know exactly what is their country that they can be identified. Also, is difficult for thembecause when they travel to another country they need to do new friends.

2018-04-21 00:57:44 UTC

In my point of view is blessing. First, because nothing in this life is a curse. Second, if you born in a family that each one has different customs, traditions, behaviours, thoughts, I believe that you can learn more about each culture, and you can improve your knowlegde and then you can share with your frinds. Because you build relantionship to all of the cultures, while not havin full ownership of all. Also you have accumulated a host of cultural identities and that is very enrich for you. Third, you can find more opportunities to a job in a company because nowadays companies need people who has experience, that they are able to relate to their other co-workers . For another way I agree with people taht consider if you are a TCK you might have a lot of problems, but I desagree with the sentence says being TCK is a curse.

daniela_3108_14_15 — 2018-04-21 01:29:05 UTC

Yesterday, we received an email “a tck person will come to our school”. At 4 o’clock Ms. Dorcas said in the meeting: talk behind 300 people is so hard to talk about your personal experience. My friend suffer discrimination in Brazil so for she is so difficult talk about her case front people. Is this moment I thought, be a tck has disadvantages too, is true that it´s a great opportunity to build an intercultural world because you travel a lot, also they can change the point of view of the people closest to them. But they feel homesick and they have identity problems. It´s possible that someone said “but they can cope with this” and this is a very selfish comment, it´s not only think in the economic future you need to think in the feeling of the children. Because you can provoke in their self’s traumas and consequences for all their live. Is right that some tck was a very good like for example Obama, but we need to think that exit the other part, the other face of this community.

bsbt127 — 2018-04-21 02:06:05 UTC

BRIGGITTI: From my point of view, I have no doubt that be a TCK is a blessing. I think that even thought we have different caracteristics that make us unique, we have in common that the earth is our home, so we are brothers and I believe that when you travel to another culture you are just knowing to your brothers and their caracteristics. So, why it will be a curse?. Be a TCK is to be cross - culturalist and it permit integrate a huge store of values. Also, they have a deep understanding of the different realities around the world, so they can help to develop our world and maybe because of them we can know more about the diferent cultures. It is needless to say that be a TCK is not easier given that they constantly ask themselves "Who am I?", but it is like when you have a baby, it is too hard: you can not sleep, you feel bad when your baby cries, and some moms have injuries from the bites that babies make when they drink milk from their chest, but despite all of these, moms consider a blessing to have a baby. Be a TCK is not easier, but they have the opportunity to change our limited way to see the things.

2018-04-21 02:17:57 UTC

From my point of view , I agree wiht the idea the people are TCK is a blessing ,becacuse there are one of the few people who have the opportunity to go other countries and meet new people . Initially is very harm to the children go to others places a lot however while the time goes by they being to learn differentes languages from their parents our homes ,.Also they will know traditions and cultures and they developmental frienships wiht friends that have differents origins .The interaction with these cultures building in them the ability to be open minded and the empathy .

2018-04-21 02:21:49 UTC

Coraima: As far as I am concerned, I believe that being a TCK is a blessing. Being a TCK, you can learn different languages, better job opportunities. Besides, they will achieve lived experiences of multiple cultures, which allow that racism or discrimination on the part of these people is not practiced, since, at the same time, the diverse cultures will manage to respect their lifestyles; A good example of TCK is the president of United States Barack Obama. However, the constant journey made by these people is a disadvantage, as it results in the loss of identity by not getting used to a single culture as a mono cultural person. Finally, the TCK are a blessing, since they have more advantages than disadvantages.

betzytorreszegarra1 — 2018-04-21 02:28:54 UTC

I agree with Juddy and Gabriela. From my point of view, about TCK i am partially because it has advantages and desadvantages. First, the identity is a very important characteristic that make unique to person. Is in this way that TCK can be a curse because to children is very dificult to reconaize what is his/her culture. Also, as the parents need travel for a new job, the children are harmed because they relocate and don´t have a stable home. Besides, some times TCK are victims of racism and discrimination and it can to provoke some psicologist problems. On ther hand, TCK can be blessing when permit children know differents cultures, cities, friends, custom, etc. because they travel around the world. Finally, children that belong TCK don´t practice racism and discrimination, so TCK is as a way to reduce discrimination in our socity.
Is important remember that everybody are equal in right humans, but whit unique and particularity characteristic.

2018-04-21 02:30:26 UTC

FROM

2018-04-21 02:30:34 UTC

SOLYMAR

2018-04-21 02:35:28 UTC

Aditionality they have more educational opportunites and resilience. They know more about the issues to the world because they know about the diffrent cities . WHO IS MY HOME ??? . Your home isn't one place , it is in your heart because you have your beloved with you. BY: Alexandra

2018-04-21 02:47:55 UTC

In my point of view, being a TCK is a blessing, first because this person can know not only different countries also learn about different customs, traditions, ideologies, etc., so they can develop an open mind, this ability permit People accept different points of view, it causes a great impact on the world because it can be a good way to eradicate stereotypes and discrimination. Also the Tck children are more flexible when they can undergo different changes in their lives, also they are independence and risk. On the other hand , the child suffers different problems, for example they do not know Who are they? This problem causes low self-esteem in the children, because they do not feel special and unique, but I think this problem can be solved with the help of their parents.
In conclusion, I believe that TCK has more advantages for children and society because disadvantages can be a solution with the help of parents.

2018-04-21 02:49:06 UTC

by: Sheyla grande

milenacascorojas — 2018-04-21 02:57:53 UTC

I believe that being TCK is a blessing, for different reasons:

- They get to many experiences and learn about to each culture during their stay.

- They are open minded because they are very flexible and adaptable to many places.

- They have a special ability to compare and solve international and local issues, because they have accumulated a host of cultural identities.

- They build a relationship with the whole world, because they have a sense to understand the people around the world.

- They learn different languages and have a lot of Passports.

- They can figth against to the discrimination and sterotypes, because they have an opportunity to know cultures.

- They are global people and they are the solution to the problems in the world. The ache for home lives in all of us, the safe place where we can go as we are and not be questioned.

Maya Angelou

2018-04-21 12:47:24 UTC

Solymar From my point of view of being a TCK is both a blessing and a curse. While you are thoroughly exposed to the different sets of people around the world and encounter all sorts of magnificent things, cultures and new customs, these make you feel a citizen of the world. Nevertheless a sense of identity becomes hard to grasp this due to the lack of roots and stability can and will likely cause issues at one point or another in life.

meyleemzavaletaramos — 2018-04-21 14:27:15 UTC

Meyleem :In my point of view, being aTCK's is a blessing, since it allows to have knowledge of other cultures, traditions, and deliver the world from another point of view and also have more capability to adapt to live in change. Although on the other hand, It has a disadvantage since these people are constantly asking about their identity, or if they have an explicit identity since these drastic changes in their lives can affect their emotional exit. That, too, depends on the personality type of each person. TCKs already, for some people it may be beneficial, but for the person who has this situation, it is difficult. Finally, I consider that the world is made to learn new things, some hurt you but you must get up and persevere, just like the TCK' s

arilsonabrigosilva — 2018-04-23 14:00:04 UTC

i think that TCK is a blessing for some reasons:

arilsonabrigosilva — 2018-04-23 14:03:41 UTC

i think that TCK is a blessing for some reasons: 1) permit that you know different cultures and different people 2) In a job , permit that you will have a more oportunities 3) Permit the develop of your social skills , because you should interact with others people

clim_janette_nina — 2018-04-23 22:10:07 UTC

Please, type your names so I can identify whose opinion I am reading. Thanks :-)

clim_janette_nina — 2018-05-19 16:17:48 UTC

Do you think the kind of toys you played when you were a kid will affect your education and career choices in the future?

clim_janette_nina — 2018-05-19 16:18:29 UTC

stefannyroque50 — 2018-05-20 16:26:58 UTC

From my point of view, the toys that I played in my childhood greatly influence in my future choice of career. The majority of parents buy a doll if they have a girl instead if they have a boy they buy building blocks. It is with these toys that we develop our first skills, however these are often stereotyped so they often limit our abilities and consequently our choices. A girl who combing or dressing a doll develops creative skills so in the future she will decide to be a hairdresser or fashion designer. In contrast, a child playing with building blocks is more likely to be an engineer or scientist. This is the reason why there are more women who are managers or fashion designers and more men who are engineers or scientists in the world. In my case, my parents allowed me to choose which toy I wanted to play with, a doll or a car, so I feel that my decisions are not influenced by gender stereotypes.

2018-05-20 18:58:19 UTC

Gabriela Rayme: As far as I'm concerned, throughout the history, sterotypes from society influence genereation to generation about how must to be a girl or boy since their birth, for example, when a girl born, the family immediately buy clothes or toys, but for that is necessary to "follow some rules"; for clothes: it must to be pink because if you choose another color like blue or yellow, you are crazy given that blue or yellow are only for boys, and the same case with toys, you must to buy a doll because it's for a girl, and cars or robots it's special for boys. In add, toys that play the children affected in their future career choices because another traditional toy for a girl is "kit of a doctor", so it influence to the girl to be a doctor in the fututre, and the same way with the boys because the family give to the boy a police car, so it drives to the boy to be a policeman. Those types of misconseptions are present anywhere, and it affected in the future of the children who grow with this wrong ideas because they'll obligate to their children to follow that ideas, and matbe if is a boy, he'll be male chauvinist and perhaps he'll use the blows because "the rule and tradition is follow that ideas in the family". However, in my case is different because my parents at the beginning bought me a lot of dolls, but it didn't like me. Then, my parents and family realize that I loved to play with a ball, and at that moment my family were disagreement because "only boys play with a ball", but my parents ignored that and they started to taught me how to play sports with a ball like volleyball. After that, they support me to play volleyball, and they taught me that we must to be open minded and set aside that "correct ideas" and try to be different to improve our world. Finally, that "change of ideas" from my parents affect to my education and career choices in my future because now I know that I can make anything that I want because that stereotyoes only are "ideas" and it's better to set aside that.

betzytorreszegarra1 — 2018-05-20 19:49:23 UTC

From my point of view, about the type of toy, I am partially because it depends of the roles that parents had on their children. Firstly, nowadays there are specific toys for girls and boys, which generate stereotypes from an early age in children, for example in most cases the stereotypes of "boy's toys" tend to involve action, construction as Lego and Meccano and "girl’s toys" such as Barbie are related to the roles of the kitchen. And as children are in constant learning these can influence easily on their future decisions. However, if parents maintain that their children have access to healthy toys will permit develop new skills and abilities. In addition, it allows children to be prepared to face new challenges in education and make good decisions about careers. Personally, the type of toy doesn’t influence in my education and career choice. To conclude, the role of parents in the education of their children is very important because they are a means of help.

milagrospachecofalcon16 — 2018-05-20 22:56:49 UTC

I agree with Betzy. You are right ! There are a lot stereotyes about the types of toys that the children should play. As the girls said. The boys have that play with cars and the girls with doll or teddy. This had been maintained during years in our society. Not is new something indeed. But this shouldn´t to affect in the future carrer of the children. For instance, If I see boy plays with police cars, he will be policer officer or If I see a girl with a dinnerware set, she will be waitress. Children can change your career when they grow up. They are only ones that make decisions about your careers. The parent´s can advise to them, but only that, no more. However, nowdays some parents want that their children study as they want as Shazia Mirza of text "the courage to change". Honestly, I believe that type of toys doesn´t influence in the future carrers of children. The children must be what they want in your life. And not a toy determine their lives.

lucerocandarellano — 2018-05-20 23:07:55 UTC

From my point of view, I believe that a toy doesn'tt define the character or the way of thinking of individuals. For example, when I was little I used to play with dolls, farm animals, trolleys, stuffed animals, etc. In itself, my parents never imposed on me the logic of playing strictly with dolls because I was a girl. On the contrary, my parents consider that a child should play with anything, no matter if society only considers it for a boy or a girl. As a result of this, I believe it isn't a toy that defines the life or the future of a person, it is those beliefs in which you grow. So, as my parents taught me that there isn't distinction between one toy or another, I also believe that there isn't reason to make differences. It is not the toys of my childhood that have influenced my current decisions, at least not directly; my decisions are strictly linked to what I consider correct for me.Therefore, I believe that the common gender stereotypes haven't affected me, however it is likely that a toy will influence their future, for example, if a girl only plays with dolls it is very likely that in the future she will choose a career with models, design or something related to the design, while if a child just played with cars in the future it is very likely that he chooses to be an automotive engineer or something related to that.

vjenniferalexandra — 2018-05-21 01:15:31 UTC

CANCEL upload link search_web camera more_horiz POST

2018-05-21 01:35:29 UTC

arilsonabrigosilva — 2018-05-21 01:36:32 UTC

In my opinion I think that does not affect, because when you are a child you do not have a reasonable thought, because you are simply a child, that through toys you can entertain yourself.
It is also necessary to mention that toys can be educational like puzzles, games of lego, etc. In this case, the toys would influence your education, since you would develop both cognitive and social skills, which will help you get better when you grow up.

bsbt127 — 2018-05-21 01:37:30 UTC

BRIGGITTI: Nowadays, we know that there are many kind of stereotypes, and one of them is the gender stereotype that can be visualized from one is a child with the toys that parents give to their children. From my point of view, I believe that in one way or another the kind of toys you played when you were a kid will affect your career choices in the future, however, not in everyone. A man who directed an experiment from the BBC mentioned that "men hugely dominate careers prizing maths, spatial awareness and physical confidence" and in the experiment he directed, people had to give to a girl and to a boy some toys; here the adults showed some stereotypes given that they gave to the boy toys related to the spatial awareness and physical confidence like robots, cars and puzzles while the girls were given dolls and fluffy toys. It can explain why “men hugely dominate careers prizing maths, spatial awareness and physical confidence". So, when we do that, we are limiting children. What if girls want to play with cars and boys want to play with dolls? Maybe here we have future mechanics women and paediatrician’s men or gynaecologists. So, parents should delete their stereotypes and give different kind of toys to their children.

13juddy_pena — 2018-05-21 02:04:20 UTC

From my point of view, nowadays many people believe that it is normal to adopt gender stereotypes as part of social coexistence, since stereotypes are often used as a basis for the education of children, who from little learn what should use or with which to play, for example as seen in the video, many people believe that the "right" is that girls play with dolls and children with toy cars and that if it happens otherwise is an "aberration" that probably the child has mental problems or is sick. That is why if we want to eliminate stereotypes, prejudices and even a problem as big as discrimination, we must stop following the "rules" of gender stereotypes and start admitting that people follow their own rules, for example how to dress or play (children), only this way we can change the world and the ideologies.

daniela_3108_14_15 — 2018-05-21 15:53:47 UTC

Well I hold the opinion that gener stereotypes are part of us so I refer that it comes from different places or different societes. First of all I want to define the concept of stereotypes and according to the article GENDER STEREOTYPES: "These stereotypes about what men and women are supposed to be". I remember that when I was seven years old my parents bought me a lot of barbies and pinks thinks or something like that, and with mi brother occured the same he always played with cars and his Avengers you know. So for me that was so normal pink for girls and blue for boys. But nowadays, I can see the true because the society can not define who are you. Be male or female, boy or girl the person can be all he or she want so gener stereotypes are not always true! They are just assumptions about what we are meant to be like, but not who really are. But we can challenge stereotypes. Because many times they are not true and it is like someone comes and put you into a kind of box, the true is that real pople are more complex and interesting that stereotypes. So all of this kinds of stereotypes are just ideas that become different places and also judge people and put them into categories.

hilary2004tlv — 2018-05-21 19:32:49 UTC

Nowadays, the gender stereotypes are very common in our society, a clear example of this can be seen in experiment from the BBC in which makes know the gender stereotypes through toys where the girls only had to play with barbies or dolls, while the boys only had to play with cars or robots. However, I think that in a future this will not permit to be open minded given that while pass the time this type of stereotypes will be transmitted from generation to generation, but, parents are aware of what they do? In my opinion parents make this mistake unconsciously, maybe it could be for a habit or maybe they are not informed of the impact of gender stereotypes in the future generations, but is now where they must begin to became aware of their actions and begin to improve. On the other hand, if gender stereotypes will be eradicate, will permit to women to be mechanics or men to be chefs given that they will not follow "society´s rules". This will permit to grow as a society, free of perjudice and discrimination. It is amazing how small things such as toys can have a big impact on the children´s future. So, gender stereotypes should not continue from generation to generation.

2018-05-21 23:23:07 UTC

In my point of view in nowadays the society life with a lot stereotypes however we don’t perceive that. If you go a supermarket you can see the passage where is the toys the section of the girls and the boys is totally different. Because you can find a lot car, puzzles and others things that society consider is to the boys and in the girl´s section is a lot dolls dressed in pink and toy kitchen. The things that I mention is a clear example to stereotypes. Also I read articles about this topic, and find that society change with the time duo to in the years 70´s the majority business sell neutral toys, that is don’t separate the toys to genre masculine and female. This toys have clothes with neutral colours like red, yellow and others. After the Second World War the people began to separate the toys but the psychologists and scientist published investigations that show like parents teach to their children this stereotypes however the people became to understands this problem and started changes some habits, although this misconception is very strong because it past to generation to generation.

2018-05-21 23:43:33 UTC

Sheyla grande
Gender stereotypes are very common in our society. This error is generated from the parenting of our parents, because since we were born we have shown these differences, for example girls are bought pink toys, dolls, kitchens; and likewise he is told not to play with carts because it belongs to men, in the same way it is indicated to men. Despite this insignificant difference in the toys and the mistaken idea mentioned by the mothers, we could say that children are aware that they are small, notwithstanding the BBC's experience with this problem has proven otherwise, since from small children acquire this knowledge, which means that when these stereotypes crescend they are inefficient to them and It is transmitted from generation to generation. In this sense, I believe that the parenting provided by parents in most homes helps to build a society with gender stereotypes.

clim_janette_nina — 2018-07-09 15:23:16 UTC

Before answering these questions, it is important you do some research and quote your findings:

1. What is the concept of "custom"?
2. What is the connection between "custom" and "daily routine"?
3. Is language limited by culture OR is culture limited by language?
4. What is the difference between "idiom" and "language"?

gabyrayme19 — 2018-07-10 01:27:37 UTC

First of all, according to Cambridge dictionary custom is a way of behaving that has been established for a long time, and is something that we usually do, and that's right because throughout the history, a custom in a community was building, maybe with some differences with other cultures given that each group of people experienced distinct events, perhaps with food, religion, lenguage, believes, customs, traditions and so on and so forth, and that's related with our daily routine becasue each day we construct a new culture maybe with new words or new styles of food, for example, in the past, peruvian people didn't use idioms or slangs, but with creativity we could "invent" new words such us "estoy aguja" that's similar that Idon't have money, and the same case happen with anglophone culture and other cultures, for instance when someone say " I doncha know" is similar to say I don't know; so, that type of culture, that's language, was constructed in our daily routine, to say in a funny way some activities, feelings or thoughts. On the other hand I desagree with the sentence number three given that nor language limited by culture, neither culture limited by language because we can learn other languages to understand with everyone on this world, and that's our case as we're learning english to try to learn the cultures that speak english like US or UK, and our culture don't limit us to learn that, and maybe we can have some difficulties but is only obstacles and we can work it out. Finally, the difference between idiom and language is that idiom is part of language given that language is a system of comunication and idioms has a particular way, only for meaning like a "hot potato" that if we translate that we imagine maybe that a potato is cooking or something like that, but the real meaning is that a topic is controversial. To conclude, idiom is part of language, and that's part of culture, and we use it every day and also each day we constructed taht with new types of words maybe, and we have the responsability to take care that.

garaycerna2001 — 2018-07-10 03:23:47 UTC

First of all, according to cambridge dictionary custom is a way of behaving that has been established for a long time, and is something that we usually do, an this is right because with the pass of time old the people have differentes customs and traditions and this persist during the many years. In the other hand, la connection between custom and daily routine, first the define of daily routine is a habit that is acquired by repeating the same task or activity many times, routine implies a practice that, with time, develops automatically, without the need to imply reasoning, and as previously explained the concept of custom, then it is already saying that the connection of that is the habit that is acquired. The answer for this question, "is language limited by culture or is culture limited by language?", in this case from my point of view, the culture is limited the languaje, because the place where we are born creates Our Culture and therefore it is a language translation, that is to say, the language depends to a large extent on your culture. For idiom and language there are no differences, since language is a complicated system of associations between ideas and sounds or gestures (to include sign languages) that each human society has without exception, and the word language usually refers to a language that has a literary corpus or that is used in national and international forums; that has a higher number of speakers or that has been standardized in some formal way. Both have great equality, so they do not have a difference.

arilsonabrigosilva — 2018-07-10 12:32:48 UTC

1. In my opinion custom is a practice or rule of conduct established in a particular community, locality, or trade, by long usage and obligatory on those within its scope. A valid custom must be certain, reasonable, not contrary to statute law, and of immemorial antiquity (see time immemorial). Also called custom and usage. Not to be confused with customs. 2. The connection that exist between custom and daily routine is that we consider custom it would be proper to consider habit since it is generally used as synonymous with custom and performs a positive function. Habit means “an acquired facility to act in a certain manner without resort to deliberation or thought.” It is an individual phenomenon. Persons tend to react in the manner to which they have become accustomed. 3. In my opinion the language limit the culture , because the language is the way that someone use for comunicate with people of differents cultures. Also if you dont know how function this language , you can´t comunicate and dont permit that you received ideas 4. First of all , idiom y a typical phrase that use people of a specific places , this language is very informal and the language is formal.

2018-07-10 12:38:06 UTC

In my poin of view the custom is a usage or practice of the people, which, by common adoption and by long and unvarying habit, has become compulsory, and has acquired the force of a law with respect to the place or subject-matter to which it relates. by alexandra huari

2018-07-10 12:38:19 UTC

(Juddy Mashely Peña)1. In my point of view, define what is custom normally is confusing becuse some people think that it's a way of behaving or a belief that has been established for a long time, but others think that is something you usually do. But I think that is very complicate

natally_espinoza11 — 2018-07-10 13:58:34 UTC

First of all, according to the Cambridge Dictionary, define a custom like the habitual actions that we have, sometimes it include in our daily routine. From my point of view, the language shapes the way we think, because nowdays there are about 7,000 languages spoken around, and they all have different sounds, vocabularies, and structures. Is for that reason that I consider that the languages shapes the way we think due to all of us are diferent and have a different perceptions to see the things influence for the language that we have.

bsbt127 — 2018-07-10 21:13:27 UTC

BRIGGITTI: According to the Oxford Dictionary, a custom is a traditional and widely accepted way of behaving or doing something that is specific to a particular society, place, or time. And according to the Cambridge Dictionary, a custom is a way of behaving or a belief that has been established for a long time, but also it says something you usually do. It could be a little bit controversial. Personally, I believe that custom is the behaviour that a specific group of people has, and that has been transmitted from generation to generation, but also a custom can be part of the daily routine, for example, if I say "I pray every day in the morning", it is part of my daily routine, but also it is part of a custom in my family.

daniela_3108_14_15 — 2018-07-10 23:25:02 UTC

According to the third question: "Is lenguage limited by culture OR is culture limited by lenguage?" I personally think the lenguage is limited by culture, because is inside of. Learning a language, therefore, is not only learning the alphabet, the meaning, the grammar rules and the arrangement of words, but it is also learning the behavior of the society and its cultural customs. The meanings of a particular language represent the culture of a particular social group. To interact with a language means to do so with the culture which is its reference point. A particular language points to the culture of a particular social group.

lucerocandarellano — 2018-07-10 23:54:05 UTC

According to the Cambridge dictionary, "a way of behaving or believing that it has been established for a long time", citing what custom comes from a long time as an example to the actions of the Incas, but we also define custom as those actions that we usually do. I believe that customs are closely linked to the concept of daily routine, since the development of these activities forms in people the inter-action of their actions.
In the same way, I consider that neither language limits culture, nor culture limits language. It may be that the interrelation between the language of a culture is assimilated but that does not indicate that it is a limiting factor. Also, when I refer to language is that set of vowels or consonants that identify a group of people; without referring to the idioms that are those phrases or expressions characteristic of a smaller group (these idioms are particular and proper to each group) because unlike a language is more complicated than a foreigner understand the language if it is not linked to the context of the speakers

betzytorreszegarra1 — 2018-07-11 13:00:25 UTC

According Humboldt (1836) the "thought and language are inseparable", that means that they are in constant interactions . So, in my opinion, language shape the way we think about space, time, colors, and objects because it form part of our life and it is the way that we trasmit our ideas, thought, etc. So, the differents idioms have differents forms to write, pronunciation and grammatical. For example, english speakers usually when refered to a "friend" doesn't necessary mentioned the gender. However, spanigh speakers mentioned the gender og it: "amiga" ó "amigo". That is why, our way to think is limited by the lenguage.

clim_janette_nina — 2018-07-11 17:20:21 UTC

INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE POSTING: Research about ONE language in danger of extinction and answer the following questions. STRONG AND BRIEF COMMENTS are going to be considered as extra points for the Roundtable. Not anynymous postings will be considered.
1. what does it mean for languages to “die”?

2. what is the reason for this language to be in danger of extinction?

3. What is the consequence of a language becoming extinct?

4. What do you think can be done to save languages?

13juddy_pena — 2018-07-11 19:21:00 UTC

Elfdalian (the language of the Vikings): I think "die" for language means that people prefer speak in other language (lingua franca), because they believe it is better than other nordic languages. Also, it means the extintion of the languages, because each day there are less people who want speak elfdalian. According to Ancient Origins each day there are less people that speak elfdalian becuse it has different tones and sounds. Even the grammar and vocabulary are unlike Swedish. So while speakers of Swedish, Norwegian and Danish are able to have simple conversations and understand this doesn't happen with elfdalian. On the other hand, regularly the extinction of any language can provoke the extintion of culture, beliefs and the essence of live.But all is not lost, because there are activists that started a campaign of awareness and preservation. The group of language activists, called Ulum Dalska (“We need to speak Elfdalian”) have seen some success in attempts to revitalize the language.

bsbt127 — 2018-07-12 01:40:52 UTC

1. From my point of view, for a language to "die" basically means that people simply stop speaking it. I agree with what Juddy says, the majority prefers to use lingua franca and it causes the extinction of a language and sadly, with the culture to which it belongs.

bsbt127 — 2018-07-12 02:04:55 UTC

N/uu language (South Africa)

2. In the case of the N/uu language, only 3 native speakers remain. The reason why this language is critically endangered is because the speakers live in different villages and learn other languages, people simply stop speaking it. Also, BBC said that N|uu, which has 112 distinct sounds, including 45 “clicks” that are typical of San languages was passed on orally down the generations but never written down. Also, one of the speakers said: “Very often white settlers kept the young girls, but they killed all the men.”, “We were told not to make noise and the baas [a Dutch word for supervisor] would shout at us if we spoke the language because they believed we were gossiping.” The genocide is one of the reasons for what this language is in danger of extinction too.

daniela_3108_14_15 — 2018-07-12 23:59:38 UTC

Elfdalian (the language of the vikings):

1. I personally think, in the case of Elfdalian the word "died" means when it is forgotten by people over the time so in this way this language disappear.

daniela_3108_14_15 — 2018-07-13 00:02:59 UTC

2. According to the article "7 languages on the verge of extinction", the principal cause is if all the people who speak it have died. In Elfdalian case, no more than 1.800 persons speak it. Other factor is because people simply stop speaking Elfdalian. Speakers of the language were stigmatized, and children were actively discouraged to use it at school.

claudiacosme1904 — 2018-07-14 01:57:27 UTC

QUECHUA PERU
1. That a language dies means that it no longer exists in the world, maybe some linguists or other people know it, but in a secondary way.

2. There are different reasons why a language is extinguished as for example in the case of Quechua in Peru is for suffering the linguistic exclusion of the society. Also, Quechua speakers are small groups so they do not have much voice in the middle of the population. Also, according to some stereotypes, people think that speaking Quechua means coming from the mountains, which generates discrimination.

3. When a language is lost, in Quechua Peru, we would be losing part of our culture, that is, we lose our identity. Likewise, we diminish the knowledge about this language for future generations.

4. We should do different activities promoting our culture. Likewise, in schools, this language should be taught for its knowledge as a new language and in our culture that identifies us.

arilsonabrigosilva — 2018-07-15 16:04:21 UTC

1. what does it mean for languages to "die"?

In my opinion, for a language to die means to disappear from the earth, that is to say, to become extinct and that there is not a single person who speaks this language, such is the case of the Capanahua language located in the Loreto region of Peru.

2. what is the reason for this language to be in danger of extinction?
The Capanahua is a language that was extinguished approximately in the year 1925, thanks to the rubber fever these were affected surviving only 100 capanahuas at the end of the fever, it is in this way that in the course of time this language managed to become extinct and disappear
3. What is the consequence of a language becoming extinct?
The Capanahua is a language that was extinguished approximately in the year 1925, thanks to the rubber fever these were affected surviving only 100 capanahuas at the end of the fever, it is in this way that in the course of time this language managed to become extinct and disappear.
4. What do you think can be done to save languages?
I believe that an Institute should be created that preserves every language that is about to be extinguished around the world, as well as the creation of a dictionary that facilitates the understanding of this culture.

gabyrayme19 — 2018-07-15 16:29:09 UTC

1.- What does it mean for language to "die"? Personally, I think that is when people stop to speak their mather tongue, and I agrre with Juddy and Briggitti, because basically it disappear when people prefer to speak lingua franca than their mother tongue.
2.- What is the reason for this language to be in danger of extinction? The principal cause that quechua is in danger of extinction is that quechua speakers are ashamed to be discriminated for Spanish speakers, and according to El Comercio, only 13,2% of quechua speakers recongnize to quechua their mother tongue, ans it's worrying.
3.-What is the consequence of a language becoming extinct? To be honest, part of our culture and identity will disappear because our ancestors always spoke quechua, and they grew as their mother tongue, but sadly, we're losing it for our mediocrity.
4.- What do you think can be done to save languages? It's right that government are everithing as they as possible to save quechua, but it isn't sufficient becuase if we change our behaviour to evit discrimination, maybe quechua speakers didn't have fear to speak quechua, given that discrimination is the principal problem that they have, so, if we help to them to speak quechua, and perhaps teach us, quechua will permanent in our culture.

natally_espinoza11 — 2018-07-15 23:16:10 UTC

QUECHUA (PERU) In the world more than 7,000 languages are spoken, but not all will survive, one of them is Quechua or also known as the language of the Incas. According to Unesco, this dialect appears in the list of the 2,465 languages in danger of extinction in the world.

The meaning of “the language die” means the consequence of the modernization because nowadays the context influence on us to learn and use new languages that we consider “more important” due to sometimes this language such us English, Spanish and others give us more opportunities, and it is the reason that quechua to be in extinction. On the other hand, migrations also determine the loss of the mother tongue, as their speakers stop using it to speak the language of the place where they are. In most cases, speaking the second language is a survival mechanism and a way of mimicking cultures, and another factor is caused by stereotypes determining the death of a language.

So, to be sincerely part of our culture and identity will disappear because our ancestors spoke this language, and in the past it was our mother tongue, but if we not revaluate this, in the future we don’t have a culture, and it’s meaning that we loss a cosmovisions, gastronomic knowledge and others.

Finally, I would like to say, that we are in time to save one of the important languages (Quechua) the unique solution is in our hands, so it’s time to promote this language using TV, radio, others; or start to create new laws that involve us with this people that speaking their mother tongue. We can create a solution!

hilary2004tlv — 2018-07-16 00:29:40 UTC

JEDEK LANGUAGE (SOUTHEAST ASIA)

1- From my point of view, for a language to "die" means that it disappears over time, given that few people practice their native language. An example of this, is Jedek language, because only 280 people know and practice this language. So, this can be extinguished.

2- Personally, I think that the reason for Jedek language to be in danger of extinction is because they are a minority group from Western culture, they suffer from discrimination because they are gatherers and hunters. So, this produce fear in the people and few people know about this language.

3- Well, the consequences of Jedek language becoming extinct is that one part of the culture will be disappear and also this affected the cultural identity of this minority group, causing them low self-esteem and the history of their culture dissapear.

4- Undoubtedly, to save languages depends of all the people and the government, having a cultural awaraness, where the government can create new educational laws to teach different native leanguas of each culture in the schools with the aim of students know about these and they can reflect and improve in values to be open minded. So, the change depends of all us to save different languages.

soly_huaripayta — 2018-07-16 00:30:00 UTC

1. What does it mean for language to “die”?

For my point of view Languages die for many reasons. Some are cultural. For example, many cultures have been colonised or otherwise dominated by another culture. Often, this translated into suppressing the native culture’s mother tongue. If these conditions lasted long enough, then these languages dwindled, were only spoken in secret or died out altogether. Numerous examples exist in North America, where indigenous people, now known as First Nations’ people, have either lost or are in grave danger of losing any working knowledge of their mother tongue.

2. What is the reason for this language to be in danger of extinction?

It is true that there is a new interest in this language, however those who use it in their daily life and as their mother tongue often end up abandoning it when they emigrate to other regions, they stop talking because it is not practical and they forget to teach their children. children, either for some kind of shameful evening or because it is impractical-excuse redundancy-try to teach them a language they will not use in school. In this way I have been able to see how many people who descend from Quechua speakers are losing this important heritage.

3. What is the consequence of a language becoming extinct?

The main consequence of losing a language can mean losing crucial knowledge about the linguistic group’s history, culture, or even knowledge about their local environment. For example, being able to choose different words for plants or even the earth they grow in also provides scientists, botanists and academics with information that might be lost otherwise if these specific descriptions did not have an equivalent word in a more dominant language.

4. What do you think can be done to save languages?

In order to save languages and recognize the value of moribund languages we can to preserve them through the use of modern technology. This can include recordings, which can facilitate some of the language’s context, also can even include mobile phone applications, which may have particular appeal to younger members of a culture.
Student: Solymar Quispilaya Huaripayta

betzytorreszegarra1 — 2018-07-16 01:46:45 UTC

1. Why is the language in danger of extinction?
In my opinion, languages die because first the people who speak this die and second because nobody could revalue, practice and teach this to the other generations of the same language. For example, "Aymara language" is a minority language groups in Peru, that is very common in the Andes but it could be extinguished despite the fact that several countries only speak, and according to the INEI there are currently 20.97% of children's speakers compared to 29% in 1976.
2. What is the consequence of the extinction of the language?
I thnki that possibly the actual generation of speakers would not know the cultures of our ancestors, which are important because they strengthen and enrich our cultural knowledge. Also, people who belongs to this language could have problems whit communications because nobody except this speak it.
3. Do you think it's relevant to save it? Why?
Yes, because it is very important to prevail cultures of minorities groups. Futhermore, languages are ways of interpreting the world, and no two are the same, for instance, ayamra is part of peruvians cultures and enrich our cultural knowledge.

2018-07-16 01:56:39 UTC

SANYORY LOPEZ LOPEZ 1. what does it mean for languages to “die”? I think that a language "die" when a minority group no longer speak their mother tongue. So the language falls completely out of use.

2. what is the reason for this language to be in danger of extinction? For me, the main reason is globalization because today a majority group speaks the predominant language, for example: Spanish or English. This means that the minority group that speaks their mother tongue has an obligation to teach their next generation the predominant language so that they have more opportunities and are not victims of discrimination.

3. What is the consequence of a language becoming extinct? Really The consequences is that this minority group lose a importnat part of their culture.

4. What do you think can be done to save languages? Maybe the Goverment can promote social programs that avoid the a lenguage to “die”

luz_casco — 2018-07-16 02:43:36 UTC

N|uu-Africa's language. 1. I think "died" means that languages are extinguished because people prefer to speak lingua franca. Consequently, part of their culture be loss and the next generations can have problems to build their identity. 2. N|uu only have three fluent speakers, also, this language has been passed down through the generations orally but not in writting. Finally, the gobernment don't carer their own languages, so Katrina Esau and her sisters need to teach the 112 sounds and 45 distinct clicks of N|uu to a group of local children. 3. When some languages "die", the next generation can be confused to identify their native country and they do not have opportunes to know the language of their country, so they will be able to speak lingua franca. 4.IIn this case, Katrina Esau and her sisters teach the 112 sounds and 45 distinct clicks of N|uu to a group of local children. So, the government need to create some programs to save N|uu. Also, this language should be teach in other schools.

sheylagrandenunez — 2018-07-16 03:11:11 UTC

I believe that languages die when a group of people stop talking, therefore this can no longer be transmitted to new generations, however I think that the language that speaks most of society we have some guilt, because sometimes our discriminate actions against minority languages, making their speakers not want to share it. Consequently, this will become extinct.Also about third question I think
the language is a determining part of the culture of a group of people, because it directly allows their customs and beliefs to remain intact from generation to generation. Therefore, I consider that if the native language of a certain group of people is extinct his culture could remain but his essence would be lost little by little, since the transmission of his culture would be indirect, through
the actions of minority language groups.

sheylagrandenunez — 2018-07-16 03:19:13 UTC

Finally about fourt question I consider that to take measures to prevail minority languages for example about Ashaninca language, according to news Comercio in 2015 the state generated a large mass of books in this native language, for this indegenous community. From this I consider that ,there are certain actions for avoid the extinction of languages but not enough,also I believe that the act of taking measures, either political or social, regarding this topic will not work to a large extent if we Spanish speakers do not become aware of our actions, which sometimes transgress to minority languages, to discriminate, to have a very centralized government, etc.

clim_janette_nina — 2018-08-21 12:35:18 UTC

Do you agree or disagree with the following proverb...?

2018-08-21 12:46:08 UTC

I think, this frase is rigth because the beauty depende the of the judgment of the beholder, and if this thing to se the beholder produce fellings in his or her self it can be a posibility judgement in a particular way. and everyone have rules to judgment in a particular way a thing. for example nowdays, andre alejos.

13juddy_pena — 2018-08-21 12:46:34 UTC

I'm agree with this proverb. Because, nowadays all people follow social trends that was transmit
through the media, a clear example is the concept of beauty, how be "perfect people" or have "perfect appereance". But it's necessary change all of us to fit in social's stereotypes. A exampe of thi are the realitys, that trasmit a wrong idea about beauty such as "Esto es guerra""Combate". Also, sometimes youtuber can transmit this idea. And not only that, people also copy the style of "famous people", called it "outfit". For that, I think that we must value ourselves.

vjenniferalexandra — 2018-08-21 12:49:41 UTC

About this phrases, I think this refers to the how people think about beauty in different places, in this way I think for the concept of beauty influence the culture, of the place, and also influence the trend, that aspects I consider are very important for talk about beauty. Also I think in more places social media influence a lot in the meaning of beauty or for think how is the beauty, and in some cases can be dangerous. Because social media show a "perfection bodys", "perfect face" or "perfect clothes", and teenagers are influences to the desire for have this body, face or clothes; and the thinking of beauty is change and is adapted of the "image" what show the media. Finally, I think a lot of aspects are influences in how people consider is beauty.

arilsonabrigosilva — 2018-08-21 12:49:49 UTC

Arilson Miguel Abrigo Silva: First of all is necessary to define What is "beuty". Beauty is a combination of qualities, such as shape, color, or form, that pleases the aesthetic senses, especially the sight. So how do you determine if someone is beautiful or not? Around the world there are different cultures, each with a different perception of the other about Beauty. For example in Korea, being white and with thin build are features that determine a person's beauty. However for Mauritians having plates in their mouths is a symbol of beauty. In conclusion we can say that beauty depends on each culture, and depends on who the viewer is.

milagrospachecofalcon16 — 2018-08-21 12:50:41 UTC

I agree with this phrase, because , each people have diferent perception of look the beauty of the people.But , personality , is necesarary look the interior beuty that phsical beauty, because, the percepction of the person would more confident that the other.

lucerocandarellano — 2018-08-21 12:50:43 UTC

I agree with the phrase, not only because I consider beauty to be particularly delicate. The concepts of beauty are in one way or another more linked to the perception of the culture of each human being, this exemplifies the different perceptions of perfection and beauty. of the different countries of the world. For example, in the Asiatic environment it is considered beautiful when you have a "V" shaped face and the pale pile with small but slanted eyes; However, in areas such as America, a body with curbs, large eyes and tanned skin is considered beautiful. These concepts of beauty are born within a culture and that could explain that a person is considered a symbol of beauty within their country, but only one ordinary being in another.

claudiacosme1904 — 2018-08-21 12:50:47 UTC

First of all, I agree with the caption because according to a study: "the unique environment of a person would determine what he finds physically attractive". In this sense, I think that, indeed, beauty is in the crosshairs of the humble, so it goes through different problems to become like a celebrity or a beautiful person from the perspective of each one. Also, the Harvard University did an experiment, where they had a set of identical twins and another of non-identical twins give a score of 1 to 7 to 200 faces and checked the degree of coincidence between the responses of each study participant and the score average obtained for each face. When the individual inclinations are analyzed it is observed that the responses of the identical twins were only a little more similar to each other than those offered by the non-identical ones. This suggests that genes play a minor role in the configuration of facial preferences: almost the entire variation is explained by the unique environment surrounding each individual.Finally, I believe that everyone have a perspective about a beaty person and someone wnat to be like they.

bsbt127 — 2018-08-21 12:51:06 UTC

From my point of view, it is right to say "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" given that we could see that the meaning of beauty is not the same in every country or culture, a prized painting could be beautiful in one country and not even the slightest bit of attractive in other. It depends on the culture. Also, it is needless to say that not everyone around the world have the same perpective, so we need to change our mind and start to see with eyes of love, and change the eye of the beholder about people.

gabyrayme19 — 2018-08-21 12:51:20 UTC

I desagree with the phrase because beauty is inside of oneself, and it depend of self-esteem because not everybody will wait to other person say to him that he's beautiful or not, and sometimes, that comments about his appareance will affect to the person because not always that comments are positives, and it could be affect to mental health. So, a great examples of that is John Locaster, because he was born with a malformation, and his parents abandon him only for be "ugly", and all his life he suffer bullying and he wanted to die, but then, he learn to overtake that obstacle and now he has a family, and his wife says that the beauty is in oneself and not in an appareance. Finally, I want to say that beauty is inside of oneself.

natally_espinoza11 — 2018-08-21 12:51:22 UTC

From my point of view, I agree with this idea because all of us have are important all! also that nowadays we see a different youngers influenced with a new trend. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" is subjective and we create this perception . One of most popular cases about the beauty happened in a certamen of beauty most of the girls that participated they sometimes follow or are influenced with the society for a look more beauty and then sometimes suffer eating disorders to obtein the perfect body because it's the unique way

milenacascorojas — 2018-08-21 12:51:22 UTC

I agree with this stimulus because the marketing is a media to attract customers, one example of this, is the envelope, it needs to be attractive and colorful to encourage it sales the product. But, I think have a different meaning, because show the pression of the media to people to need to be perfect, and that is a cause that provoke eating disorders like bullimia. So, it is the biggest problem in the world, that affect everyone, and it transmits through social media.

2018-08-21 12:51:26 UTC

Firstly we know the meaning of the beaty is to relation with our perspective abput some someting . Is true the each person have a differente way to se the world ,however this can be to influence with somes aspects such as the personal experiences . The beauty is in the eye of the beholder , in my point of view I agree with this phrase because somes scientifs articles , some people consider something more than other .It depens of the culture and how this influence in the way of this people thinking . Also acorrrding with some experiments not all the people consider the beauty how one thing . By :Alexandra Huari Soriano

soly_huaripayta — 2018-08-21 12:51:31 UTC

From my point of view, I will say "Many times" beauty is only skin deep.Yes it makes sense but this is not what I asked. I intended to ask " Is beauty is something solid (physical) or is it all in the mind. As for me one thing I have realsied is "It's not WHAT you see, It's HOW you see it." Sometimes not even the considered prettiest (by accepted standards) as you said once you realize that it's only skin deep but on the other hand once yor realize that behind those ordinary looks there is an extraordinary person views change (atleast in my case). But it all depends what one is looking for those in search of outer beauty find it and those in search of something deeper find it too may be not as easily these days, but most of the times they do.

nayelitkm100 — 2018-08-21 12:51:47 UTC

The majority of people think that beauty is in our exterior but that idea is wrong, because the beauty is inside of us. In other way, beauty is show in a different ways. For example when you smile, when you do some actions, or when you help to other people you show our beauty. Perhaps we think that solution to be beautiful is with surgery. Last but not the least physical trait makes you a true Korean beauty is having a “V line” face. If you do not have a V line shaped jaw, surgery is readily available to you in Korea because that is an essential beauty code (Rajvanshi, 2015, p.16)

betzytorreszegarra1 — 2018-08-21 12:51:50 UTC

Nowadays, beauty is related to the perspective of each person. Thus, I partially whit the stimulus. For example, to peruvians people beauty is more in the physical appearance such as perfect eyes, slim person, etc. but to Koreans people have clear skin and ir is for a beauty model that they have. So, it is improve by culture.

garaycerna2001 — 2018-08-21 12:51:55 UTC

I agree with the phrase, as we know, it applies not only to physical beauty issues but also to anything proposed as perfect and desirable, but more than anything would be if beauty is in the eye of the spectator, highlighting that all We have different perspectives, that is, beauty can not be judged objectively but subjectively, because what one person finds beautiful or admirable may not attract another.That is why we have to change the perfection stereotype

yoma_lopez123az — 2018-08-21 12:57:35 UTC

I agree with the caption because sometimes I think the beauty is the phisical perfection, but the beauty depends of the perception of the people. Maybe the stereotypes that our society have about the beauty affect to any person for example "Esto es guerra" o "Combate" create a image of the beauty, so many teenager try to achieve the phisical percpection risking their health. Is the perception of the teenager. Also for many people the beauty that show this TV shows is incorrect. This also related with the culture because in each culture have an idea bout the beauty for example for Maori culture the women with tattoos are beutiful but for the Peruvian culture its rare. In conclution the beuty depends of the perception and the culture

sheylagrandenunez — 2018-08-21 13:07:01 UTC

In my point of wiev I agree with the sentence ,since this from the start being captured by people through perception, according to a study by Harvard University, people have different perspectives regarding who can be considered as beautiful, this is due to the impact of their social context. Since they considered the beautiful person, the one that most resembles the people around him

hilary2004tlv — 2018-08-21 13:07:15 UTC

I agree with this phrase, because I think that each one of the people have their own concept of beauty and I think that the really concept of this depends of the culture. A good example for this is the beauty over time, because in the anciest Greece, the beauty are represent for fat women. In the anciest China the beauty are represent with the little feet of women. So, the concept of the beauty depends of the perception of each people, but also of the society, because they impose the beauty standars and some people are influenced for it and I don't agree with this given that the perception of each person is the most important because this not permit create stereotypes, and it is different with the perception of the society. To conclude, "Interior beauty improves the external appearance"

stefannyroque50 — 2018-08-21 13:26:24 UTC

I am agree with this sentence because the perception of beaty changed by the culture and individual experience. Now, Occidental and Asian people think that a woman beauty have big ages, be pale, slim and tall. In diference, in many African tribes for men is more attractive the woman who use the biggest plate in her mouth.

meyleemzavaletaramos — 2018-08-21 15:30:18 UTC

I agree with the caption because the "beauty" is an abstract notion linked to aesthetics.And in my opinion this word also has a variety of meanings because what is beautiful in one country and not even a little attractive in another.Bacause the "beauty" change depent the place and people, and all of consequence of social media and social stereotypes, it affects in the shape of think of the people .For Example for Korean women, beauty is synonymous with having palliated skin,while for Latin American women, beauty is more related to having a more tanned and summer skin.Finally I consider the concep of Beaty
is formed with the stereotypes, prejudices that each culture emerges to the individual, which can generate some disagreement in the if it does not comply with the beauty patterns which leads to a physical disorder that threatens his life.

daniela_3108_14_15 — 2018-08-21 20:55:47 UTC

In my point of view the literal meaning of this phrase is: the perception of beauty is subjective so, according with that my position is in favor. Firtly, because of the culture, according to your origin place you can be consider such a beauty person. Secondly, because of the stereotypes. So what is beautiful depends on the culture, beauty depends on the perpective of every person.

clim_janette_nina — 2019-10-15 15:23:58 UTC

CANCELAR upload link search_web camera more_horiz PUBLICAR

clim_janette_nina — 2020-03-25 01:58:38 UTC

CANCELAR

clim_janette_nina — 2020-03-25 01:58:40 UTC

CANCELAR