An embodiment perspective argues for the inextricable nature of identity and the body, one that can envision a body “beyond the binary of materiality or representation – the body not as an object but as an event.” 
(EG Research Paper pg. 3)

"...learning to internally listen to one’s bodily signals and body language, to recognize and understand one’s needs and emotions as a means to feel alive in one’s body and one’s relationship to others and society, is argued as necessary for well-being and control, or, in our case, for coherence."
(EG Research Paper  pg. 4)

"Social media removes us from our corporeality, reinforcing the notion of a mind/body binary. Embodiment theory demonstrates the vital role of the body in attaining and maintaining a healthy, productive relationship to self and others in order to function in society. An identity lacking corporeality is already at risk for coherence, and without bodily involvement on social media, identity becomes an object which can be commodified."
(EG Research Paper  pg. 6)

"I have been concerned with how technological somnambulism, or blindly following technological trends, translates to giving up our power in larger societal issues. What if these technological habits are keeping us isolated in myopic bubbles, embedded in the constant present tense and vying for attention, and keeping us from looking widely and critically at our own actions the their potential effects on others?" (EG thesis pg. 7) 

"...leaving man free to explore, to create, to think, and to feel.” 

"It is important to understand that for Haraway, these four descriptions of the cyborg (cybernetic, hybrid, of the present, of the future) are not discrete, but rather co-determinate. For instance, Haraway argues that in philosophical terms, there is no real space between "lived social reality" and "fiction", because one category is constantly defining and refining the other."  (Teresa Senft)

The clinging to internal boundaries of identity limits our imagination and creates a binary sense of self; a black-or-white, this-or-that understanding of who we are or can become. Here, I argue for expanding our understanding of distinctness so that we might imagine a future ontology not of “this or “that” as we can already articulate, but one we haven’t yet conceived. 
(EG Thesis pg. 8-9)

“The enemy is not what constitutes us (organs) but what has been put upon our organism or the structures and constructs that constitute our form. If you “go no farther than the organs... you stay locked into the organism, or into a stratum that blocks the flows and anchors us in this, our world.”  (Deleuze + Guatarri, BwO)