<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Police Shootings: Issues in State Crime 2020 by Lea Sitkin</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha</link>
      <description>In what ways does US law, policy and training on police use of deadly force fall short of international standards? (Breakout group 1)

What is the likely legal outcome of the George Floyd case going to be/  why exactly was Philando Castile acquitted? (Breakout group 2)
Is this an example of state crime?</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-10-20 08:38:15 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2020-10-20 11:37:43 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Philando Castile </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844300266</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The case was acquitted because the officer reasonably believed at that moment that himself or others around him were in danger. The case of Tennessee v. Garner 1985 supports this as danger doesn’t have to be prominent in order to use Letha force in the united states. The video evidence also did not display what Castile was reaching for as-well. However  it is acknowledged in the case that the officer could have taken 'lesser steps'  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-20 10:49:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844300266</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Philando Castile</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844306685</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Former officer Yanez was acquitted because he stated that he was acting in self-defense.  Additionally, the judge present in this case wrote in a letter addressed at the jury who acquitted him that they simply had to determine whether, beyond a reasonable doubt, a crime had been committed. Not whether racism continues to exists or whether police training is ineffective. <br><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-20 10:53:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844306685</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>One way the US training falls short, is the the international standard emphasises the need for law enforcement to use other means before resulting to physical force and to be trained in alternatives such as peaceful settlement of conflict and negotiation. however as some states don&#39;t require a justification for the use of force, and just a &#39;suspicion&#39; of threat, these alternatives may be overlooked</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844307343</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-20 10:54:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844307343</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844309267</link>
         <description><![CDATA[In Floyd's case, his death was foreseeable because it's only logical that someone dies after being choked out for 8 minuets. In addition, the officer has been warned multiple times that Floyd couldn’t breathe from both his colleagues and eyewitnesses therefore Derek will be convicted. 
Another reason that might result Derek to get convicted is that he wasn’t allowed to use “the conscious neck restraint” due to Floyd being in the Police car and not presenting harm but Derek pulled him out of the car and preformed the conscious neck restraint. Derek Had 18 complaints on him prior the incident and one fatal case so that might give you an image of his work ethic.
]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-20 10:55:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844309267</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>US law falling short</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844309921</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>in some states in the US they dont even have laws about when to use deadly force, and in the US the police can resort to lethal force for a wide range of circumstances. The US law doesnt follow the laws made by the UN (whos laws say that lethal force should be a last resort and only if the officers life is in danger). The US laws dont really have a way to measure if their officers lives are in danger, the officers just need a suspicion of there being a threat to their lives. Also, the US doesnt really have fixed pattern to how they escalate situations, for some instances they will just use police to deal with possible law breaking activity, but for other circumstances they will bring out the military which is even more dangerous. In conclusion the US has backwards and dumb laws :)</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-20 10:55:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844309921</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Floyd</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844310703</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The legal outcome in George Floyds case will mostly likely be all the officers being convicted. Derek pressed his knee against Floyds neck as Floyd clearly stated repeatedly he cannot breathe with many witnesses present. Moreover, Derek has been charged with second and third degree murder and manslaughter. With the rest of his colleagues charged with aiding and abetting second degree murder and manslaughter. Thus, they are mostly to be convicted with these charges.</div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div><div> </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-20 10:56:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844310703</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Castile</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844315994</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Due to the system in the USA being lax, most police officers have guns and are allowed to use deadly force when they feel threatened. Moreover, the law justifies their actions even if there was no evidence of real danger. In contrast the international law allows the use of lethal force only when it is unavoidable. Also, international law requires police officers to provide immediate medical aid after, however from the video of Philando Castile we can see that no help was provided. The police officer continued to hold his gun towards Castile. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-10-20 10:59:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/leasitkin123451/snhm9lynaxordha/wish/844315994</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
