<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>American Educational System by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq</link>
      <description>Ranking of Historical Events in Order of Importance</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-04-17 22:12:19 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-04-18 07:50:17 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>No. 1- Old Deluder Satan Act</title>
         <author>ld82442</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166653613</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Old Deluder Satan Act was passed in Massachusetts in 1647. It required that towns of 50 or more families to provide an elementary school, where the teachers were required to teach, not only reading and writing, but the bible as well. In towns with 100 or more families, grammar would be added to the curriculum. In these schools, the students would primarily focus on Latin a Greek, along with studying the bible. By focusing on religious teachings, the Puritans believed that their children be able to resist evil temptations, and avoid sinners. Another necessity for education in primary schools, was that it would benefit their children who would at least be capable of reading their laws and the bible. </div><div> </div><div><a href="http://klacks.weebly.com/uploads/3/7/7/3/3773138/old_deluder_satan_law_1647.pdf">http://klacks.weebly.com/uploads/3/7/7/3/3773138/old_deluder_satan_law_1647.pdf</a></div><div> </div><div>The reason I ranked this act as number one on my list is because it is the commencement of public education in the United States. Although it was not focused on perusing intellect, this created a pathway for young children to search for an education and pursue a different path from what they’re parents had originally created. This law helped a few generations of children to become literate and in return, contribute to stabilizing the American society with the knowledge they gained through their studies. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-18 00:29:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166653613</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>No.2- Plessy v. Ferguson</title>
         <author>ld82442</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166653728</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The 1896 U.S. Supreme Court Case, Plessy v. Ferguson, ruled the constitutionality of segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. This court case stemmed from an incident that occurred in 1892 in which an African-American, Homer Plessy, refused to sit in a Jim Crow car while riding the train. His act violated the Louisiana Law and when taken up to the Supreme Court, the court ruled that, “a state law that implies merely a legal distinction between whites and blacks did not conflict with the 13<sup>th</sup> and 14<sup>th</sup> Amendments.”</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><a href="http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/plessy-v-ferguson">http://www.history.com/topics/black-history/plessy-v-ferguson</a></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>The importance behind this court case and the reason why I decided to put it as number two, is because it commenced an uprising that would lead to desegregation in public school, with the Brown Case, and later in public spaces. Granted, the court case ruled against Plessy and brought upon “separate but equal” spaces, which we know were nowhere close to being equal, but began a revolution for equality.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-18 00:30:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166653728</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>No. 3- Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka</title>
         <author>ld82442</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166685716</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The 1954 U.S. Supreme Court Case, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, was a landmark case that declared that separate public schools for black and white students was unconstitutional. The court case was a combination of five separate court cases heard by the Supreme Court concerning the issue of segregation in public schools. These cases were Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Briggs v. Elliot, Davis v. Board of Education of Prince Edward County (VA.), Boiling v. Sharpe, and Gebhart v. Ethel. Although each case had a different focus behind them, the main topic behind each one was the “constitutionality of state-sponsored segregation in public school.” </div><div> </div><div><a href="http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/history-brown-v-board-education-re-enactment">http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/history-brown-v-board-education-re-enactment</a></div><div> </div><div>The reason I decided to set this case as third is not because it is not as important as the other two but because this case was a result of the previous two. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka resulted in the desegregation of public schools and began paving the pathway for an equal education among races. It was not an easy road traveled but it proved to be successful. The desegregation of public schools was an enormous piece in the battle for civil rights. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-18 07:12:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166685716</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>No. 4- Kalamazoo Case</title>
         <author>ld82442</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166685754</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Kalamazoo Case was a suit filed against the school board to prevent funding from coming directly from tax money. Charles E. Stuart, Theodore P. Sheldon, and Henry Brees were the initiators of the suit again the school board. Circuit Court Judge Charles E. Brown found in favor of the school board, and the case was appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court. Justice Thomas M. Cooley upheld the decision of the Circuit Court and finally settles the question of public financial support for the high schools in Michigan. The Kalamazoo Case gained prestige through this hearing and led to similar decisions in courts surrounding the state. The high schools in the state increased from 107 to 278 by 1890.</div><div> </div><div><a href="http://www.kpl.gov/local-history/education/kalamazoo-school-case.aspx">http://www.kpl.gov/local-history/education/kalamazoo-school-case.aspx</a></div><div> </div><div>The Kalamazoo Case is an important court decision because it allowed public schools to remain being funded by local taxes. With the extra funds that were being invested into public schools, children would be able to continue their education into a secondary school without having to pay extra for private schooling. Also, since the rate of high schools increased in the region, less populates areas (schools with less than 200 children) could supply adolescents with an education without having them travel far. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-18 07:13:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166685754</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>No. 5- No Child Left Behind</title>
         <author>ld82442</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166687796</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The U.S. Act of Congress in 2002, No Child Left Behind, reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. It supported a standard based reform of education by setting high standards and establishing measurable goals that could improve an individual’s outcome in education. Students were expected to be tested in reading and math in grades 3<sup>rd</sup> to 8<sup>th</sup> and once again in high school. The primary focus of No Child Left Behind was to close student achievement gaps by providing all children with a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education. The four pillars that this program was expected to cover were accountability, flexibility, research-based education, and parent options. All students were expected to meet or exceed the standard in both reading and math by 2014. The act required that each state development assessments that would cover basic skills and the schools who achieved the academic goal would receive federal funding. </div><div> </div><div><a href="http://www.k12.wa.us/esea/NCLB.aspx">http://www.k12.wa.us/esea/NCLB.aspx</a></div><div> </div><div>Although this program didn’t prove to be successful, I decided to choose it as fifth because it made the public realize what does not work to determine a child’s potential. Standardized tests are not the best way to test a child’s intelligence or a teacher’s knowledge and capability of teaching a subject. There are several factors that contribute to the test results and in many cases, there not taken into consideration. Not all schools have access to the same resources. Also, many students who live in less privileged areas and don’t have the same luxuries as some of their peers whose parents are more financially stable. This program has paved the path for a new reform, ESSA, that could improve the education system for many underprivileged youths. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-18 07:28:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ld82442/sn55c2pij0nq/wish/166687796</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
