Traditional vs Contemporary VO2 max Testing by Emma Kingzett https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1 en-us 2018-07-13 11:21:10 UTC 2022-02-04 10:27:47 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/1f3c3-2642.png Faulkner 2015 https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029178975 SPV displayed slightly higher VO2max results than GXT, with GXT having the ability to underestimate SPV VO2max by 19%.]]> 2022-02-04 10:10:45 UTC https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029178975 Traditional Pro (Faulkner et al. 2015) https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029180813 Traditional VO2 max tests show a higher VO2 max number compared to a self paced test when the maximum increases from 63 ml.kg-1.min-1. ]]> 2022-02-04 10:12:27 UTC https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029180813 Contemporary Advantages https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029183253
  • Hogg et al (2015) conducted a study where athletes completed VO2max at more variable speeds similar to competitive sport.
  • They found that SPVspeed protocol produces VO2max values similar to those obtained in the GXT and may represent a more appropriate and athlete-friendly test that is more oriented toward the variable speed found in competitive sport.
    • ]]>     2022-02-04 10:14:30 UTC https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029183253     Traditional and Contemporary Pro (Faulkner et al. 2015) https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029185582 There was no significant difference between traditional and self paced testing suggesting that both tests may be appropriate measures of maximal aerobic capacity.]]> 2022-02-04 10:16:20 UTC https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029185582 Lim et al (2016) https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029190048
  • Lim's test was 10 min in duration and comprised five x 2 min stages of incremental exercise, which were adjusted according to prescribed RPE levels. 
  • Participants were instructed to modify their running speed on a moment-to-moment basis in line with the prescribed RPE, rather than the end-point of the task, so that their RPE (not their speed) remained clamped for each given 2 min stage. 
  • They concluded that a field-based SPV is a valid and reliable VO2max test. As trial familiarisation did not moderate VO2max values from the SPV, the application of a single SPV test is an appropriate stand-alone protocol for gauging VO2max.
    • ]]>     2022-02-04 10:20:07 UTC https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029190048     Faulkner 2015 https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029194341 GXT was continuous and incremental, whereas SPV was 5x2min incremental stages. This could explain the difference in VO2max values as continuous exercise provides no rest.]]> 2022-02-04 10:23:48 UTC https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029194341 Beltz et al (2016) - Review Article https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029196244 Traditional VO2 max tests do not have identical criteria or don't consider individual variability in physiological responses.]]> 2022-02-04 10:25:32 UTC https://padlet.com/emma_kingzett/VO2max1/wish/2029196244