<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>My funky padlet by Usic</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/sj2tbuwh76thy34</link>
      <description>Made with fortitude</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-11-26 10:51:11 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-11-26 11:26:28 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>proposal 2 </title>
         <author>haaljaberi1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/sj2tbuwh76thy34/wish/1914171640</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;</div><div>What additional information might you want to know about the study in order to decide whether or not it should be approved?</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><strong>I would like to know if the research is conducted in a responsible and ethically accountable way. In this case in particular the drawbacks out weight its benefits. If they are taught the right way </strong>they are less <strong>likely to contract an STI</strong>. They are also more likely to use condoms and contraception.&nbsp;</div><div><strong>&nbsp;</strong></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>What are the benefits that might result from this research? What are the potential harms?</div><div>The research does more harm than good some of these include, its harms involve Uttering perceptions for younger generation Miseducation of individuals and creating unrealistic expectations.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>If you were on an IRB reviewing this proposal, what would your recommendation be?</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Ninth graders should be educated on sex the right way not through watching explicit television because it will alter their perception of sex especially because ninth graders are young and are very likely to develop a false stigma around the sex that happens in real life and on television.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-26 11:13:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/usictech/sj2tbuwh76thy34/wish/1914171640</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 3</title>
         <author>YingfanZhang</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/sj2tbuwh76thy34/wish/1914171892</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Proposal 3:<br>1.</strong> first, to clarify the steps of the experiment, to obtain the approval of the school as well as the students, to ensure that the experiment does not cause psychological pressure on children; second, to understand the privacy of each subject needs to be concerned to ensure the implementation of protection.<br><strong>2. </strong>The benefit is that it is easier for the teacher to understand the level of ability of the student and to provide specific help for students of different abilities. The potential harm is that it may offend students and hit their self-esteem. Level discrimination can also arise between students, with good students developing an unexplained sense of superiority and feeling proud. Poor students can feel inferior and even cause psychological problems.<br><strong>3.</strong> If I were a member of an IRB, my advice would be not to use such offensive methods to distinguish between the ability levels of students. The teacher should observe in a GENTLE way while ensuring the student's dignity and privacy. Even more so, they should not label and stereotype students, because students who have difficulties may also become good students through their own efforts.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-26 11:14:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/usictech/sj2tbuwh76thy34/wish/1914171892</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Group 1</title>
         <author>klee2817</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/usictech/sj2tbuwh76thy34/wish/1914172323</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Proposal 1</strong>:</div><div>Priya is interested in whether listening to music while working out makes people exercise harder. She plans to ask college students to come to the gym and run on a treadmill for half an hour either while listening to music or in silence. The dependent measure will be the number of miles run in that time period.</div><div><strong>Questions</strong>:</div><div><strong>What additional information might you want to know about the study in order to decide whether or not it should be approved?</strong><br>Types of music<br>Volume of music</div><div>Exercise habit</div><div><strong>What are the benefits that might result from this research? What are the potential harms?</strong><br><strong>Benefits: <br></strong>Understand more about music rather motivate people paying more effort in doing workout or not</div><div><strong>Potential harms:</strong><br>Health Issue: If there are some people who do not have the exercise habit, it may cause some potential health problems such as heart attack.</div><div>Accuracy of the research: Choosing the target audiences may be a possible harm to the research result, such as some people have no exercise habits, some people have exercise habits.</div><div><strong>If you were on an IRB reviewing this proposal, what would your recommendation be?<br></strong>Should identify potential harms of the research and not only focus on one specific age group (students), as students are not the only age group that will listen to music during workout. Focusing on only one age group will lead to the research show unfair results.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-26 11:14:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/usictech/sj2tbuwh76thy34/wish/1914172323</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
