<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>HH4025 Week 5 Discussion by Sam 684</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/laujws684/si97oa55lrgrxzqd</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-02-10 16:05:51 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-02-10 16:36:43 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Discussion Qns 1 </title>
         <author>laujws684</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laujws684/si97oa55lrgrxzqd/wish/3322815278</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>How does the study of dental perspectives and mtDNA enhance our understanding of human migration patterns and their influences on the population?</p><p><br></p><p>"Their (Neolithic southern Chinese) close affinities to many South-east Asians in metric features thus suggest genetic</p><p>influence from southern China in Southeast Asia." from Dental Perspectives pg 202</p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-10 16:08:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laujws684/si97oa55lrgrxzqd/wish/3322815278</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Discussion Qns 2 </title>
         <author>laujws684</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laujws684/si97oa55lrgrxzqd/wish/3322815998</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>How do technological sophistication levels indicate trade interactions between communities separated by large geographical distances and linguistic differences?</p><p><br/></p><p>"The excavations uncovered the largest-known Lapita site. The many potsherds found there date back to 1600 BC - essentialy the same dates as the earliest Lapita culture in the New Hebrides, New Caledonia, Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga. The artefacts found at the site are full-blown Lapita: there is no trace of gradual local origins, and the oldest deposits contain the most elaborate Lapita pottery." Diamond, 1988</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-10 16:09:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laujws684/si97oa55lrgrxzqd/wish/3322815998</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Discussion Qns 3 </title>
         <author>laujws684</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laujws684/si97oa55lrgrxzqd/wish/3322825608</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Acknowledging the limitations of models in classifying languages in linguistics and science, what are the plausible alternatives to understanding the culture of communities with barely any written records?</p><p><br/></p><p>"The phenomenon was first described by Wurm and Laycock (1961-62) in discussing problems of classification in Papua New Guinea. Its existence introduces a certain Arbitrariness in the definition of "language" and "dialect"  in Melanesia and explains why linguists differ from the definition of "language" and " dialect"  in Melanesia and explains why linguistics differ about the number of languages actually spoken therein" (Bellwood et al ,212)</p><p><br/></p><p>"Austronesian history has been difficult to reconstruct, however, because there are no preserved samples of writing in any Austronesian language until about AD670, by which time the family's expansion was nearly complete" (Diamond,709 ) </p><p>   </p><p><br/></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-10 16:15:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laujws684/si97oa55lrgrxzqd/wish/3322825608</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
