https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9 en-us 2017-03-30 16:57:33 UTC 2017-03-30 18:07:05 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163782782 Decided that redistricting is questionable and that the federal court may intervene in redistricting cases.

1) Legislature using the power to redistrict in their favor without the Federal court having any say.

2) One believed that redistricting was a political question that the Federal courts could not resolve while the other fought for the Federal courts.

3) Ruled that the Federal court  determines the constitutionality of redistricting because majority of the justices believed the court should be involved.

4) It caused Federal courts to become even more involved in legislative decisions; redistricting became a cleaner process.

]]> 2017-03-30 17:38:12 UTC https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163782782 https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163782956 1. It was when the supreme court protected the freedom of court in the constitution 
2. Congress passed  the Espionage Act right after  to make illegal to have freedom of speech during war time  
3.Schenck thought it was unconstitutional and his client was practicing is freedom. 
4. He argued that in the constitution says that we have the right to freedom of speech in the first part of the constitution ]]> 2017-03-30 17:38:46 UTC https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163782956 https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163783373 1) This case decided segregation in school is unconstitutional.
2) One side was stating separating students by race went against the constitution, and the other said that it went with the state laws.
3) The Supreme Court ruled in unconstitutional because it went against amendments.
4) It impacted the whole country because now all public schools were desegregated. 
-Bishop chilton]]> 2017-03-30 17:40:05 UTC https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163783373 https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163783489 1)the Court established a right of personal privacy protected by the due process clause that includes the right of a woman to determine whether or not to bear a child.

2)Roe  against wade fundamentally altered the terms of the abortion dialogue by asserting a federal power over what had been understood as a state right. 
3)support. The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy  protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

4)influence and protect many women and women's rights.

]]> 2017-03-30 17:40:32 UTC https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163783489 https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163784404 1) The state of Maryland tried to tax all banks that were not apart of their legislator 

2) one side thought that the Maryland tax was unconstitutional but the bank of the united states was constitutional 
3) the supreme court had said they had implied powers under the necessary and proper cause in the constitution that gave the bank of the united states permission to tax. 

4) the Maryland tax was removed 

]]> 2017-03-30 17:43:14 UTC https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163784404 https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163788240 2017-03-30 17:54:25 UTC https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163788240 https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163790155 2017-03-30 17:59:28 UTC https://padlet.com/m_j_ryan724/s3mt9x6jtxv9/wish/163790155