<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>What is the best way for the U.S Government to regulate artificial intelligence to protect individual privacy on social media?
 by Ciline Brizel</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:02:12 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-02-13 03:27:22 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>(Ciline) Source 1:</title>
         <author>20265412_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324117273</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>“Artificial Intelligence, Digital Self, and the ‘Best Interests’ Problem.” <em>American Journal of Bioethics</em>, vol. 24, no. 7, July 2024, pp. 27–28. </p><p>Jeffrey Todd Berger.</p><p><em>EBSCOhost</em>, <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2353028">https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2353028</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>This specific source describes digital autonomy, serving as a good example to how AI algorithms can influence a user to misrepresent themselves, or skew their digital persona to confirm to their algorithm. </p><p>-“Therefore, weighting of social media</p><p>activity (e.g. posts, “likes”) for AI input may lead to a</p><p>particular outputs of uncertain value,” (Berger, 27). </p><p>“Data correlative to the patient’s discernable demographic characteristics such as</p><p>estimated age, sex, apparent gender identity, and ethnicity, may provide some bearing to an otherwise assumptive decision making process,” (Berger, 28).</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:08:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324117273</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Source 1: Social Media and the Workplace; Author: Kenneth Olmstead</title>
         <author>20264925_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324117708</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Discusses data and statistics regarding how social media affects workers in the workplace regarding productivity, building relationships with co-workers, etc. Shows how social media makes impact in a professional setting</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/06/22/social-media-and-the-workplace/" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:08:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324117708</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>(Ciline) source 2:</title>
         <author>20265412_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324120739</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>“Social Media Addiction and Lie Concept from a Psychological Perspective.” <em>Current Approaches in Psychiatry / Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar</em>, vol. 17, no. 1, Jan. 2025, pp. 84–94.</p><p>Deligöz, Eda.</p><p><em>EBSCOhost</em>, <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1431201">https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1431201</a>.</p><p>Deligoz describes the heightened impact of Social Media on mental health, underlining it's affect on being the catalyst to certain disorders and issues with mental health. </p><p>-“As the dissonance between online identities and real-life selves increases, individuals may develop depression, anxiety disorders and even narcissistic tendencies,” ( Deligoz, 86).</p><p>-“Thus, the proliferation of lying on digital platforms is not only an individual problem, but also carries risks for the mental health of society,” (Deligoz, 86).</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:10:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324120739</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>(Ciline) Source 3:</title>
         <author>20265412_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324124183</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>“Social Media and Mental Health.” <em>The American Economic Review</em>, vol. 112, no. 11, 2022, pp. 3660–93.</p><p>Braghieri, Luca, et al.</p><p><em>JSTOR</em>, <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/27181537">https://www.jstor.org/stable/27181537</a>. </p><p>Braghieri explores the negative psychological effects of social media, arguing that the AI algorithms behind it can have a negative effect. He underscores this through his case study where he has students use Facebook, and monitors the results, consistent with the hypothesis that it has a detrimental effect to their mental health.</p><p>-“We find that the rollout of Facebook at a college</p><p>had a negative impact on student mental health. It also increased the</p><p>likelihood with which students reported experiencing impairments</p><p>to academic performance due to poor mental health,” (Braghieri, 3660).</p><p>-“Overall, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that social media might be</p><p>partly responsible for the recent deterioration in mental health among teenagers and</p><p>young adults. It is up to social media platforms, regulators, and future research to</p><p>determine whether and how these effects can be alleviated,” (Braghieri, 3690).</p><p><br><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:13:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324124183</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Source 2: The Role of Media in American Politics; Author: Dr. Michael Kryzanek </title>
         <author>20264925_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324126302</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Discusses the effect social media has in politics with political figures. Many of them nowadays rely on social media to get a message through, or to push support for their campaign since the app allows news to travel widely and quickly. It also discusses media distrust, and how the growing generation is trusting too much in the media for actual news, and being misled by false information.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.bridgew.edu/stories/2024/role-media-american-politics" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:15:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324126302</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>(Ciline) Source 4:</title>
         <author>20265412_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324129235</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>"Policy Implications." <em>Deepfakes and Synthetic Media in the Financial System: Assessing Threat Scenarios</em>, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2020, pp. 26–32.</p><p>Bateman, Jon</p><p><a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25783.14">http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25783.14</a>. </p><p>This specific source describes the impact of deepfakes, AI images and videos that impersonate people. This AI tool, although negative, has been used on various online platforms, causing misinformation, and impacting various people using these platforms. This has had significant detriment to the emotional and mental well being of users.</p><p>“Someone then views that media and responds—for example, by believing and acting upon a deepfake. Finally, an indirect victim affected by the synthetic media may also seek to respond—for example, the person depicted in a deepfake seeks to refute the narrative. Although detailed policy prescriptions are outside the scope of this paper, this sequence of events could provide a basic framework for organizing policy responses. Each event engages different stakeholders and therefore offers distinct opportunities for policy responses (see table 2 for a simple overview). Of course, specific interventions each have costs and limitations as well as potential benefits. Many of these interventions are already being explored or could draw on existing measures</p><p>for countering financial harm and disinformation,” (Bateman, 30).&nbsp;</p><p>“thetic media is unlikely to threaten global financial stability or the macroeconomy—but individual people, companies, and government institutions are vulnerable,” (Bateman, 32).</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:17:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324129235</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>(Ciline) Source 5:</title>
         <author>20265412_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324139352</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>“Mental Health and AI.” <em>Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences</em>, vol. 77, no. 3, 2024, pp. 12–13. <em>JSTOR</em>.</p><p>Carter, Kate.</p><p><a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/27304418">https://www.jstor.org/stable/27304418</a>. </p><p>This specific source is being added as it also pertains  to Joanna's IRR, it discusses the lack of humanity of AI, but also how it can impact the job market, which can also connect with Joanna's research. </p><p>"thers envisioned AI as an eventual replacement for human providers, especially for individuals currently receiving insufficient care. A mix of AI technologists and human practitioners initiated another discussion about providing treatment that was ethical and equitable. Some participants expressed skepticism about AI’s lack of humanity, asking questions like whether an entity that will never experience death can effectively provide comfort," (Carter 13)</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:24:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324139352</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>“SHAPE GLOBAL NORMS FOR AI USE.” The American AI Century: A Blueprint for Action, Center for a New American Security by Martijn Rasser et al. (source 1)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324142760</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><p>Goes into details about potential solutions: such as the Title IX and adapting old regulations (OPEN Data Act). </p></li><li><p>Provides examples and evidence. </p></li></ul><p>Rasser discusses potential solutions and makes pros and cons lists for the AI regulations. “Congress should modernize P.L. 101-246, Title IX, which ‘restricts the U.S. licensing of exports and re-exports of crime control and crime detection equipment and instruments listed in the Export Administration Regulations to China’” (Rasser et. al 5).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep20445.12" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:26:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324142760</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> ““Artificial Intelligence in Social Media.”” International Journal of Scientific Advances, Matthew Sadiku (Source 2)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324144398</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><p>Goes into details on the science of AI </p></li><li><p>He discusses how companies use AI and for what reasons </p></li></ul><p>Matthew N.O. Sadiku, author of well known science textbooks and major in Electrical and Electronics Engineers said as AI becomes more widely used in social media “for ecommerce, customer service, marketing, public relations, and more, the applications of artificial intelligence in social media companies are many”</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368060163_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Social_Media" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:28:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324144398</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> “Social Media Regulation How Should We Decide What Speech Is Acceptable/Unacceptable on Social Media?” by Ryan Kennedy. (Source 3)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324147994</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><p>Goes into details about a solution including creating an agency. </p></li><li><p>Discusses limitations and context information </p></li></ul><p><br/></p><p>Dr. Ryan Kennedy, University of Houston Machine-Assisted Human Decision-making says "One option for doing so would be to create an agency that would develop the standards and monitor compliance, or to task an existing agency, like the Federal Communications Commission, with this work" (Kennedy et al. 11).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.uhd.edu/documents/academics/humanities/news-community/center-public-deliberation/social-media-regulation-issue-guide-2023.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:30:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324147994</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>““Disclosure Standards for Social Media and Generative Artificial Intelligence Research: Toward Transparency and Replicability.”” Ganna Kostygina et al. (Source 4)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324152033</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li><p>Discusses AI in Social Media</p></li><li><p>Provides background information on AI in social media, current regulations and how AI could impact people. </p></li><li><p>They propose a solution of greater regulations on AI.</p></li></ul><p><br></p><p>AI technologies introduce new problems for social data research. “For instance, competition between such social media platforms and generative AI systems resulted in growing restrictions of social media data access and use (e.g., for X—formerly Twitter— and Reddit) for academic, organic, and commercial users due to unlicensed or unauthorized use of copyrighted proprietary digital data by these systems to train their generative AI models or build algorithms (Vincent, 2023)" (Kostygina 2).</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.norc.org/content/dam/norc-org/pdf2024/kostygina-et-al-2023-disclosure-standards-for-social-media-and-generative-artificial-intelligence-research-toward.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-11 13:33:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3324152033</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>20264925_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326721254</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>With the team's solution some of the following limitations that might exist is that deepfakes are getting harder and harder to detect and decipher from real ones, which could lead to many harmless and non-deepfake videos to be targeted and taken down, limiting free speech. It could also cause real deepfake videos to continue staying up, since it wasn't detected. Especially with increasing advancements of deepfakes, it is a probability that they could become made so that they aren't detected under the social media regulations on deepfakes too, finding a loophole and completing going against the whole purpose of these policies. Deepfakes could also potentially go viral and be seen by multiple people before being taken down as well, leading the purpose of these policies also being useless again. These social media regulations would also have to figure out the best way to even detect these deepfakes amongst the millions and millions of videos posted. People could also find other loopholes where deepfakes would then be posted on websites (not related to social media) on the internet, where if found it could still impact a few people. A few people might also be angered by these new policies social media is establishing, saying that it is going against the 1st Amendment of their Freedom of Speech. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-13 02:50:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326721254</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pros</title>
         <author>20264925_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326726645</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Some of the pros that the second solution has is that since it is establishing regulations by the government, it would help to establish these regulations and limitations on the threats of deepfake AI among all platforms and scenarios in the United States. This includes not only social media, but the internet itself, and the availability of even allowing these deepfakes to become easily accessible anyway. The reason why so many deepfakes are even increasing is due to the fact that it is becoming more and more easily available to everyone. Anyone with even just little to no experience could create a deepfake right away, causing it to become a huge issue when fallen into the wrong hands. It would to restrict crime, and soon be able to promote more trust with the news and media. It would also be able to limit deepfakes in other areas not related to social media, such as in dark websites, television, and more. These are the pros that come with the second solution. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-13 02:55:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326726645</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cons</title>
         <author>20264925_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326734233</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A few of the cons that come when trying to follow the second solution in having the government create stricter regulations on deepfake AI's would be that it could start to affect areas where deepfake AI was actually used in a beneficial way. This can include areas of filmmaking, saving lots of time in answering straightforward questions, sparking creativity and ideas within individuals, etc. Having this whole government regulation could also spark frustration and resentment from the public, as they would see this as a violation of the 1st Amendment, saying the US Government was limiting their Freedom of Speech. It would also lead to a few criticisms, as having these strict regulations could also negatively impact the growth and innovation of America, as mentioned by a few sources according to Berry's IRR essay. These are literally technological advancements, and advancements are how America was able to come up with a lot of ideas, information, and etc., and by limiting the advancement of this technology was like limiting the space for America to continue growing and moving forward with new ideas that are to come. These are a few of the cons that come with the second solution.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-13 03:01:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326734233</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>20263469_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326750236</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet.com/202654121/what-is-the-best-way-for-the-u-s-government-to-regulate-arti-s3gxxv49o8d0duer" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-13 03:16:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326750236</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Pros</title>
         <author>20263469_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326753859</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Some of the pros that the team solution has is that since it is targeting social media platforms, it would help to establish strict regulations and limitations on how AI can collect, store, and share personal data. This includes not only social media but also third-party apps and advertisers that rely on AI-driven data analysis to track users’ online activities. The reason why privacy concerns have increased is due to the fact that AI algorithms are becoming more advanced in gathering and predicting user behavior, often without explicit consent. By enforcing government regulations, it would help to restrict the misuse of personal information and reduce the risk of identity theft, data breaches, and unauthorized surveillance. It would also be able to promote more transparency between social media companies and users, ensuring that AI systems operate under ethical guidelines. Additionally, it would limit AI’s ability to manipulate user content, preventing misinformation and targeted manipulation through algorithmic bias. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-13 03:19:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326753859</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cons</title>
         <author>20263469_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326754504</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Some of the cons that the team solution has is that since it is targeting social media platforms, it could lead to government overreach and excessive control over how AI is used online. This includes not only social media but also other digital spaces where AI is integrated, potentially limiting innovation and technological advancements. The reason why AI has been widely adopted is due to the fact that it makes the user experience better, helps businesses grow, and improves content recommendations (or the algorithm). By enforcing strict government regulations, it would risk slowing down AI development and making it harder for companies to compete globally. It would also raise concerns about censorship, as increased regulation could lead to the suppression of certain content or opinions of protecting privacy. Additionally, it could create challenges for smaller social media companies that lack the resources to comply with complex AI regulations, making it more difficult for new platforms to emerge. </p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-13 03:19:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326754504</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Implications</title>
         <author>20263469_2</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326758504</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Some of the implications that the team solution has is that since it focuses on regulating artificial intelligence on social media, it would reshape how platforms handle user data and AI-generated content. This includes not only implementing stricter privacy policies but also mandating companies to be more transparent about their AI algorithms and how they use personal information. The reason why this could have a major impact is due to the fact that it would force large companies to adjust their work which could potentially lead to resistance or legal challenges. By enforcing these regulations, it could lead to improved online security and reduce the spread of misinformation, but it may also create limitations on how AI can be used for personalization and engagement. It would also require increased government oversight, which could raise concerns about who controls the digital world and how much influence the government should have over private companies. Additionally, this solution could set a precedent for future AI regulations beyond social media, affecting other industries such as marketing, healthcare, and finance.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2025-02-13 03:23:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/20265412_2/s3gxxv49o8d0duer/wish/3326758504</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
