https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77 View the instructions on the far left side! en-us 2022-02-14 22:02:29 UTC 2025-10-20 00:06:05 UTC hello@padlet.com cavalluk1 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049009302 2022-02-15 16:39:56 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049009302 cavalluk1 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049011066 2022-02-15 16:40:39 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049011066 cavalluk1 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049012560 2022-02-15 16:41:15 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049012560 cavalluk1 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049015540 2022-02-15 16:42:27 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049015540 cavalluk1 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049019435 2022-02-15 16:44:00 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049019435 cavalluk1 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049637479 1. Read through your sample annotated bibliography with your group. 
2. Evaluate your sample using the rubric; you might consider splitting the work amongst yourselves (e.g. the intro paragraph, each source annotation, the citations/formatting)
3. After analyzing & discussing with your group members, give your sample a "grade" based on the rubric. (Yes, there's a bit of math involved.)
4. Add thorough notes in your section of this Padlet - what grade did you give? Why? What strengths/weaknesses did you see in your sample? Did your group disagree at all about the grade you gave, and if so, why?]]> 2022-02-15 22:08:28 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2049637479 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051049236 The introduction lacked needed context and had redundancy in its thesis. 7/10 in the topic description category.

The sources were of decent credibility and related to the topic. 8/10.

The author addresses the biases in both sources, 8/10.

Lacked explanation of the sources themselves, instead explained relation to argument, 6/10.

All sources used were very relevant to argument, 10/10.

Included 2 sources, one peer-reviewed source, lacked parts of proper MLA format, 8/10.

Total 47/60, or 78.3%]]> 2022-02-16 14:59:00 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051049236 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051061323 The introduction paragraph explained the topic and the writer's stance well enough, however it could have been structured better. Additionally, the introduction paragraph should go above the first citation. (6/10)]]> 2022-02-16 15:03:50 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051061323 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051068976 Both sources were reliable, made from reputable publishers, despite being biased. (8/10)]]> 2022-02-16 15:06:42 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051068976 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051070074 Our group did not have much disagreement in the grading process, we were able to discuss and come to a conclusion for each portion of the grading process.]]> 2022-02-16 15:07:09 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051070074 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051070600 strengths: 
-passionate about topic
-one good reliable source

weaknesses:
-one not so reliable source
-kind of vague
-needs more description/context]]> 2022-02-16 15:07:20 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051070600 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051075068 The writer properly explained that the sources may be biased, but justified their usage. (6/10).]]> 2022-02-16 15:09:04 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051075068 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051079155 The ideas were summarized, but the summaries could have gone more in-depth. (6/10).]]> 2022-02-16 15:10:46 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051079155 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051082247 Topic description- 10
-Clear and understandable introduction to the topic, and gave background information
Quality of sources- 8
-One source was good and both were clearly related to the topic but one source was a website lacking a publication date, or author
Identification of authority of sources- 10
-Author addressed possible bias, while giving a brief description 
Quality and clarity- 8
Clearly summarized, but feels like it is missing some ideas
Discussion of relevance- 10
All notes lined up with the topic
Quantity of citations- 8
few errors, but not perfect

]]> 2022-02-16 15:12:01 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051082247 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051082462 The writer implied that the sources are relevant, rather than establish why they are relevant. (6/10).]]> 2022-02-16 15:12:07 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051082462 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051084697 No header]]> 2022-02-16 15:12:58 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051084697 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051085806 There are errors in the format of the citation (missing indents, not in MLA format). (4/10).]]> 2022-02-16 15:13:23 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051085806 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051087302 Sample three had a great starting point, because the intro had introduced the topic well and supported reasoning behind their claim. It was organized and easy to read. Moving forward the rest of the sample was unorganized and hard to follow. It was very repetitive and lack structure. Another downfall was giving the proper credit and authorization. Although they did have well structure citations and their overall format was good. We graded this paper a 32 out of 60]]> 2022-02-16 15:13:57 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051087302 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051087985 - different fonts used
- 13.5pt font size
- no header and page number
- missed indentation on annotation
- incomplete citation for online source]]> 2022-02-16 15:14:14 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051087985 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051088112 54/60]]> 2022-02-16 15:14:17 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051088112 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051094885 The topic is clearly stated however there is no indication of the reasoning behind the argument.]]> 2022-02-16 15:16:49 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051094885 https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051095945 Gives good descriptions of the sources but doesn't explain why these sources are credible. 
8/10]]> 2022-02-16 15:17:11 UTC https://padlet.com/cavalluk1/s2e2uhmpbxfjgo77/wish/2051095945