<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>English A: Language &amp; Literature Learner Portfolio by Emily Chang [STUDENT]</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/emily_chang1/s22ap2vjclwfdh8s</link>
      <description>Made with eyes on the prize</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-09-11 02:41:16 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-09-11 04:46:37 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>emily_chang1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/emily_chang1/s22ap2vjclwfdh8s/wish/1732246904</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Based on my opinion and the feedback that I received, I think I did poorly on my Paper 1 and moderately on the presentation. Emotionally, I felt very disappointed in myself because I couldn’t finish my Paper 1 on time (60 minutes max) and I did not achieve the goal of writing it analytically. When writing, I could only finish three paragraphs, though ideally, I should have written five. And out of the five points for the analytical strand on the rubric, I only earned one point which means that I barely demonstrated any relevant analysis. For the group presentation, I felt slightly distressed because I could have done a lot better on the group presentation by using better diction and by giving more detailed and specific context to help the audiences understand the poster. Intellectually, I agree with the comments that I got because I think they address the flaws found in my work (grammar errors, word choice, and ideas) clearly and honestly. My main takeaway from the feedback is that when analyzing a propaganda poster it is extremely necessary to place it into a broader context. It is also important to analyze every detail as it can possibly address relevant details related to the poster. In addition, I learned that the rubric has a high standard, and to achieve higher points it is vital to either include more analysis of various subjects or to generate deeper understanding. According to my grades, I believe that my strength is on the language strands and my weakness is mainly on my analysis. In order to do better on future Paper 1 tests and presentations, I will read the rubric more thoroughly and analyze similar texts/posters before the final assessment to practice. Yet, I am still somewhat concerned about my skill level and would like to improve on my writing speed and analytical skills. Something that may be helpful to know is that I&nbsp;am open to advice and suggestions and definitely will not take them personally.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-11 04:42:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/emily_chang1/s22ap2vjclwfdh8s/wish/1732246904</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
