<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>3rd - Fort Dearborn by Matthew Keane</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mkeane11/s1fj2ygrb9pgx2u5</link>
      <description>Please list your name and answer these questions as you read through the article!
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xAonFJwz2FHtITMJ9S_8doUSa-77yWbsX5-7BlJzINA/edit?usp=sharing</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-05-04 03:14:23 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-05-04 15:34:26 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>mkeane11</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mkeane11/s1fj2ygrb9pgx2u5/wish/1490074714</link>
         <description><![CDATA[In your opinion, is the following statement true? In other words, were the “three visions of Indian Country” discussed in the article equally right? Why or why not?:
“The story of Fort Dearborn is a creation narrative of our city. The real story isn't about good guys and bad guys. It isn't about a massacre. It's about three groups of people with three drastically different visions of the future. It's about how each of those visions had validity. None of the three was, by nature, "righter" than the others.”
]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-05-04 15:11:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mkeane11/s1fj2ygrb9pgx2u5/wish/1490074714</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
