by Rachel Murat

Corey Europe-yes

2015-03-26 17:15:26 UTC

Was it worth the cost, for the US to join the war in Europe?

I believe it was worth it cost because it made us stand out in the military terms. And led to major rights movements that have stayed and changed our society forever. Also if we didn't drop the bomb japan could have gained more power and built up their military even more and could have attacked us and made a bigger impact on us.

Zach-Bomb-Yes

2015-03-26 17:21:14 UTC

despite all the death and destruction we caused to many innocent people by dropping the two bombs, we saved many more lives by dropping these bombs. The japanese,in a way, decided that we should have dropped the bomb on them. We gave them two opportunities to surrender and they didn't. We would have had to invade japan and many more lives would have been lost than saved.

Ally- Japan- Yes

2015-03-26 17:27:22 UTC

The "yes" side of "Should the US have dropped the bombs on Japan?" is more compelling to me because creating jobs for American citizens was very important.Without jobs, many people would have gone broke. If we had to invade Japan, we would have lost alot of time, supplies, and people. It was a good choice to not invade Japan.

Nick Taylor/Bomb

2015-03-27 00:36:47 UTC

Response: Yes, the United States SHOULD HAVE dropped the bombs on Japan.

The dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan was an event that had to occur. If the United States did not drop the bombs, the U.S. would have had to directly invade the country, which is especially difficult for transportation. In addition, without having to invade, many innocent American lives were spared. Lastly, Japan did the attack on Pearl Harbor first, so it was only right for their country to experience the same tragedy for themselves. Overall, despite how violent and harmful the bombings were on Japan, the were absolutely necessary.

Megan G. Japan No

2015-03-27 16:21:42 UTC

The US should not have dropped the bombs on Japan. A lot of people were killed by the bombs and the bombs were quite destructive. Land was destroyed, about 70 thousands lives were lost and there were two bombs dropped which added on to the destruction from the first bomb.

Ally- Europe- Yes

2015-03-27 16:21:59 UTC

It was worth the cost to join the war in Europe because it strengthened the U.S.. The world would be alot more different if we didnt enter the war. Japan might have taken over the U.S. and more of Europe. Without the U.S. joining the war, the world would be completely different today.

Alyssa-Japan-No

2015-03-27 16:22:16 UTC

The bombs should not have been dropped on japan because while it may have saved us time resources and American lives;the losses japan suffered were far worse. Japanese civilians suffered from radiation poisoning and painful illnesses and traumas,and reconstruction of the cities went slowly and there were food shortages which led to the evacuation of 50,000 people. Also,in 1939 the League of Nations made a declaration against the bombing of civilian populations and was the first declaration to deal with weapons of mass destruction,meaning that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were illegal on an international level.

Alexis- Europe- Yes

2015-03-27 16:22:34 UTC

It was worth the cost to join the war with Europe. It was worth it because while the men were in the war the woman took their places to work until they came back.Also it was worth the cost because the US gained global power and had more control then they had before. Also this prevented any future conflicts after.

Emily Pontin - Japan - Yes

2015-03-27 16:22:59 UTC

Many people died from dropping the bombs on Japan but many more people would have died if we did not. Also if we didn't drop the bombs we would've had to invade Japan, risking our troop's lives, supplies and time.

Nicoletta-Japan-No

2015-03-27 16:23:08 UTC

The US should not have dropped the bomb on Japan because many innocent people died and lost their homes and loved ones. Also the League Of Nations made a declaration against bombing civilian populations and we broke it. Japan suffered and the bombing cause a lot of destruction.

Nick Fiacco/Europe-Yes

2015-03-27 16:23:16 UTC

I believe it was worth the cost for the US to join the war in Europe because there was more benefits from joining the war than negatives from joining it. The civil Rights Movement and the Women's Rights Movement were major events that in the US and they each made a huge contributions to equality. The Civil Rights Movement was an effort by African Americans to gain equal rights and eliminate segregation. The Women's Right Movement was a movement that gave women economic and social equality. Nuclear Technology is also very important.

Peter Europe Yes

2015-03-27 16:23:25 UTC

it was worth entering the war in Europe because we were attacked by japan. also it helped the women's rights movements and after we got money from Europe during the reconstruction of Europe.

Vince Scarapicchia - Japan- Yes

2015-03-27 16:23:40 UTC

The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the most important part of World War 2. At the time of the war we were in a back and forth battle with the axis powers. If we didn't drop the bomb the axis powers could have won the war. Also The dropping of the bombs is an act of revenge towards Pearl Harbor. After we dropped the bombs there was no argument to say that we won the war so you can also say that the bombings was a turning point because it ended the war and made Japan surrender.

Marrah-Europe-Yes

2015-03-27 16:23:45 UTC

Joining the war in Europe was worth it because it allowed for the nation to become a more advanced country. The war allowed for the start of the women rights movement. The women rights movement created higher expectations for women by the early twentieth century. Women were able to attend college and to train for professions. Also the war got us out of the Great Depression because the government used wartime demand to transform what America made. The war also provided help to lead the civil rights movement. The civil rights movement was a popular movement to secure African Americans equal access to and opportunities for the basic privileges and rights of U.S. citizenship.

Nick Taylor/Japan/Yes

2015-03-27 16:24:07 UTC

Morgan Risalek-Japan-No

2015-03-27 16:24:21 UTC

The US should not have bombed Japan. The US should not have dropped the bombs on Japan because the League of Nations made a declaration against bombing civilian populations but we broke it. Also, the bombing caused much damage to the people and towns. Lastly, there was about 75000 instantaneous deaths due to the bombing.

Jordan Merritt- Japan- Yes

2015-03-27 16:24:38 UTC

The United States should have dropped the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because they bombed us and that was very wrong for them to do. When the Japanese dropped the bombs on us on December seventh they had no right to do so. Another reason we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki is because they made a secret pact with Germany about bombing us and trying to get us into another war. When Japan bombed us they did it because of the pact. When Japan bombed us they killed a lot of young men who were stationed there in Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbors bombing was unjustified. The United States bombed Japan to destroy the planes we gave the through the lend-lease act that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt asked congress to pass. When we bombed Japan we destroyed everything that they could use to invade the United States. We bombed them so wouldn't risk invasion. Those are the reasons why we bombed Japan.

Nick Taylor/Europe/Yes

2015-03-27 16:24:58 UTC

World War II has been one of the most controversial wars throughout history whether it was worth it to make the effort. Despite it being the most costly war, afterwards, the United Nations was established which is still active today. In addition, new laws were made in order to protect human rights. These rights are a vital part of today's society and give all people basic rights that are much needed. Finally, during the war, women had to fill the postitions of the men who went into the war. This showed that these women had a great presence in the work force, and made an exrreme effort during the war. Overall, the war was very tragic and costly, but it was worth the costs of getting involved.

Megan G. Europe Yes

2015-03-27 16:25:52 UTC

The costs of the war in Europe were worth it for the US. Women got job opportunities and got to do more to support the war. The US was also trying to help prevent future wars or conflict. Sure the war used a lot of money but, afterwards the US was able to gain more global power.

Emily - Europe - Yes

2015-03-27 16:26:37 UTC

Due to us joining the war in Europe our country strengthened as a whole. Technology was advanced, jobs were created, and great movements started. Examples such as nuclear technology were created. And movements such as women's rights movements progressed. So yes we should have joined the war, it beniffited our country.

Alexis- Japan- No

2015-03-27 16:26:41 UTC

It was not worth bombing Japan.IT wasnt worth it because during this process of dropping the bomb it killed thousands of Japanese people, Almost 70,000 people lost from the bomb. Also the bomb destoryed most of cities in japan and caused major destruction and this caused problems for japan. Three days after Hiroshima was dropped Nagasaki was dropped and hit japan also and this was bad for japan because of the destruction.

MeganCanzler/Europe/Yes

2015-03-27 16:26:51 UTC

It was worth is to join the war because we ended up establishing the united nations which greatly benefits us today. Also human rights were protected after the war. And lastly there was a great uprising of feminism after the war which caused equality and a large presence of women in the workforce.

Nicoletta-Europe-Yes

2015-03-27 16:27:31 UTC

The US joining the war in Europe was worth the cost because it helped many movements start such as the Women's rights movement. Also it strengthened the US and created advancements in technology. It benifited our country in many ways.

Cody- Japan NO

2015-03-27 16:27:43 UTC

It was wrong to bomb hiroshima and nagasaki because of many reasons. First we had word that Japan was gonna surrender regardless if we were gonna drop the bomb or not. Also the use of the bomb was illegal at the time to use on civilians.

MeganCanzler/Japan/Yes

2015-03-27 16:29:02 UTC

Yes we should have bombed japan because for one reason they would probably have come to the US and caused great destruction. Also bombing them saved many american lives. Lastly, they bombed pearl harbor first, which killed many Americans and destroyed expensive weaponry and ships. They brought the bombing upon themselves when they decided to destroy pearl harbor.

Peter Japan Yes

2015-03-27 16:29:05 UTC

The dropping of the atomic bombs on japan was one of the most important parts of world war 2. the reasons being this forced japan to surrender. Also without this happening the war on japan could have lasted much longer.

Morgan Risalek-Europe-No

2015-03-27 16:30:15 UTC

No the cost of the US joining the war in Europe was not worth it. There was much poverty and wages were too low for it to have been a good idea to join. The US also spent around $98 million dollars joining the war. Finally, we were getting involved in something that was not on our own continent but over seas, which would be costly. Therefor it was a bad idea to join the war in Europe.

Zach -Europe -Yes

2015-03-27 16:30:53 UTC

It was worth it to join the war in Europe because there were many more positives to joining the war than if we had just stayed out of it. For example, by us joining the war we put a stop the the Nazi empire and ended Hitler's dictatorship in Europe. Also we gained access and knowledge to new and improved nuclear technology. The involvement of the U.S. in the war also helped lead the Women's rights movement, which had many contributions to the war. The benefits of joining the war far outweigh the negatives.

Nick Fiacco/Japan-Yes

2015-03-27 16:31:21 UTC

I believe that the US made the correct decision by dropping the bombs on Japan. Since Japan bombed Pearl Harbor the US had to make a statement. By nuking Japan the US ended the conflict between the two countries at the earliest possible time. The US saved American lives by ending the war quickly and by bombing Japan we avoided invading Japan on ground. Bombing Japan was by far the better decision.

Alyssa-Europe-Yes

2015-03-27 16:35:28 UTC

The United States joining the war effort in Europe was worth it because it helped movements like womens rights and the civil rights movements gain traction after the war,winning the war also helped strengthen our nation and increased nationalism. Technology also improved as it does in any war with new things being invented and with our help the allies won much sooner than they might have.

Corey japan-yes

2015-03-27 16:37:13 UTC

The US should have dropped the bomb because if we didn't we would have gone to war with them. Also it was retaliation for them bombing pearl harbor. it could have also cost us a lot of money and also there would be lots of destruction.

Vince Scarapicchia - Europe - Yes

2015-03-27 16:38:05 UTC

At the time joining the war was the best choice to do. The country strengthened as a whole. Joining the war was improved women's rights dramatically because they had to take the factory jobs for the men while they were off fighting in the war. A great propaganda example for this is Rosie the Riveter that showed that women all across the country should stand up and be strong. Also it gained technology advancements in nuclear technology which would later help us in the cold war. One last benefit to joining the war was that it stopped Hitler's reign of terror in europe.

Cody Europe YES

2015-03-27 16:39:53 UTC

I believe we should have joined the war. First off, after the war it really made us stand out as a super power in the world. Second, It gave us leads to the great nuclear technology we have today. Third, we had a justified reason to enter the war because of the bombing on Pearl Harbor.

Amelia/Europe/Yes

2015-04-01 00:39:45 UTC

I think it was a wise decision to join the war in Europe for many reasons. First, at this point in America's history we were dealing with an economic struggle, by joining the war we created jobs for not only men but women as well. These job ranged anywhere from small factory work to building war weapons. Second, by women taking these jobs it jump-started the women's rights movement. An example of this was propaganda posters featuring Rosie the Riveter convincing people that even woman can hell our country win the war . And third, the need for weapons that where powerful and can be made in a timely manner led to the advancement in technology around the world including USA, this need for advanced technology led to more factories causing more jobs for people resulting and economic boost.

Amelia/Japan/Yes

2015-04-01 00:52:57 UTC

Yes, I think we should have bombed Hiroshima And Nagasaki for many logical reasons. One, if we had not bombed Japan we would have had to invade. This would be difficult because Japan is an island and at this point in the war Japan controlled many islands outside of their main land. This means that transporting of troops and weapons would be very expensive for America. Secondly, the building of nuclear bomb was a result of us advancing technology and also leading to more advances in the future. Third, the bombing of Japan ened the conflict between the countries all at once saving each country money and time.

Katrina/ Europe Yes

2015-04-06 17:20:45 UTC

It was worth it for the United States to enter the war effort in Europe because It helped lead the civil rights movement and the women's suffrage movement. It also helped increase our knowledge with nuclear technologies. The war also helped the United States gain global power. Also because of the bombing of Pearl Harbor it gave us enough of a reason to enter the war.

Marrah-Japan-Yes

2015-04-06 17:21:23 UTC

Yes, the US should have dropped the bombs on Japan because Japan killed 70,000 plus American men. Also if we didn't bomb them it would have made us look very weak, as if we couldn't defend ourselves. The dropping of the bomb also ended the war all together and if we didn't drop the bomb then Japan probably would have continued the war.

Katrina/ Japan Yes

2015-04-06 17:26:42 UTC

Yes i believe the United States was just for dropping the bomb for many reasons. Firstly when we dropped the bomb it ended the conflict all at once which saved us time and money. Another reason is because if we hadnt dropped the bomb then the U.S would have had to invade. Lastly The dropping of the bomb was revenge seeked by the U.S for the acts of Pearl Harbor.

Jordan- Europe- Yes

2015-04-06 17:44:39 UTC

It was worth the cost for the United States to join the war in Europe. The reason why is because before the war women were forced to stay at home with the kids and raise them to be great people. When the United States joined the war in Europe the women were called on to leave their homes so they could put the food on the table. The women were called to do the jobs their husbands did, the women took the call as a gift. Women finally felt like they meant something to the people fighting in the war, to the families that were worrying about their fathers, brothers, uncles, and grandparents some of them. Some women who didn't have a husband enlisted into the military ranks as nurses. The women finally got out of the house as strong independent women who proved to people that women can make a difference. Another reason why it was worth the cost for the United States to join the war because it help the United States gain global power. The United States gained global power because we actually helped with rebuilding the European countries that were destroyed by the war. A reason the United States joined the war was because the European countries we were aliened with would need help and we couldn't just sit back and watch the war happen without even helping. After the war the United States helped rebuild Europe and trading relations got stronger. The last reason that it was worth the cost of the United States to join the war in Europe was so that our alliances weren't mad at us. The United States helped Europe in the war to prevent future events of conflict. The United States joined the war so that we as a country would not risk invasion from another country. The United States helped in the war in Europe so that the alliance between us and the European countries would not be tangled and based on anger. Yes it was worth the cost for the United States to join the war in Europe.

Caitlyn/Japan/Yes

2015-04-23 16:58:44 UTC

I feel as if we should have dropped both bombs because it was a way to show japan that we were now weak and that we would get them back for pearl harbor. Also us bombing them ended that war.Also because if we didn't do a drop of a bomb we would've had to invade by land which would have costed the US even more money.

Caitlyn/ Europe/ yes

2015-04-23 17:03:32 UTC

i believe that it was right and helpful to join the war in Europe. It benifted our home land economically and politically. We created more jobs and women were able to join the work force. Also because the United States was then scene as a super power.

Bree/Europe/YES

2015-04-23 17:22:02 UTC

I believe that it was worth the cost that we joined the war in Europe because the U.S. became stronger as a whole. It was the start of many movements that made the U.S. better. It also gave the U.S. new knowledge.

Bree/Japan/YES

2015-04-23 21:30:07 UTC

I do believe that we should have dropped the bomb on Japan because it was a way for the U.S. to get back at Japan for the Pearl Harbor. Another reason was because it prevented future invasions of the U.S. by Japan. Finally, it officially ended the war.