Teenagers should not be allowed a television in their bedroom. Discuss. by Emmie Williams

Mollie Laity,

2018-02-01 09:38:06 UTC

I think this is a great idea because if teenagers always had a TV in their room they could get addicted, 8/10 teenagers parents agreed that people their teenagers are addicted and won’t get off the TV. When I was a child I didn’t have a TV in my room and I enjoyed the outside as much as possible, nowadays teenagers are addicted and it’s not good for them.

Cody

2018-02-01 09:38:19 UTC

I agree because teenagers could be watching things in the middle of the night like me; I should because cuz that’s what makes me tired in the morning. When I was younger, I didn’t have tv in the whole house let alone one in your room

Katie

2018-02-01 09:38:22 UTC

It can encourage the teenagers to go outside and not slump about in their room. It is an amazing, awesome and marvellous idea.

Hannah

2018-02-01 09:38:22 UTC

Gus

2018-02-01 09:38:23 UTC

I agree that teenagers shouldn’t have TVs in their rooms because they would become more social. In my day, we would play outside and make paper aeroplanes. Therefore grumpy teens wouldn’t come up stairs eat and leave and altogether they would be more social. Do you think so?

2018-02-01 09:38:23 UTC

Will
I agree because if teenagers had a tv in their room they could watch programs that are inappropriate for their age without their parents knowing about it. The other problem is your child would have is the paranoia that comes with it.

Anson

2018-02-01 09:38:24 UTC

I agree with this because teenagers could be watching anything and they could be glued to the TV. Just the other day my sister couldn't stop watching the television and she was almost late for school. There are other things to do than to watch TV. Do we really want a world with just television? Your teen could be watching something inappropriate right now. This is an absolutely, awesome and fantastic idea. You should get home now and go see what your child is doing. In my opinion, children of any age should not have a television in their bedroom.

Ella

2018-02-01 09:38:25 UTC

Teenagers could be watching tv all night. That means that they will be tired for the next day. In my opinion I think that teenagers could be doing much more fun, exciting, wonderful things. Do you want your children thinking that the only thing in the world is a television?

Mia

2018-02-01 09:38:26 UTC

I agree that teenagers shouldn't have TV in their room because they would be up late watching it and will not get the sleep an average teenager needs. 85% of teenagers and children spend to much time on TVs, phones and computers and need to get more. They would also be on it to often and not have enough time outside with their friends and family.

Tobias

2018-02-01 09:38:26 UTC

I think that this idea is amazing!! I mean, it was only the other day that my TV fell down and broke my leg. You see!! It’ll always end in tears!! 83% of the population already have a TV in their room... this means that this will increase the amount of injuries every week!!

Cory

2018-02-01 09:38:27 UTC

If children had TVs in their rooms , they would spend more time in their rooms rather than going outside and being active. Also children may be watching tv while they are supposed to be doing homework, or other school related things. Do you really want your child to be watching tv while they are supposed to be doing their home work?

Amelia

2018-02-01 09:38:27 UTC

This is an amazing idea because it forces teenagers to go downstairs and spend some family time together. It also makes teenagers more social and spend more time outside the house with their friends. When I was younger I would spend all of my time outside with my friends and family not stuck in my room watching TV for the whole day. Do you want teenagers to become squared eyed and unable to socialise? 8/10 people agree that teenagers shouldn't have TVs in their rooms.

Rebecca

2018-02-01 09:38:29 UTC

I agree to the idea because of teenagers physicall and mental health would be at risk from watching their TV all of the time. When I was young we wouldn’t of even dreamt of having a TV for myself.
It’s just not fair. 99.9999999% said that it would be a stupid , selfish and silly to have a TV in your own. Do you think this is true.

George

2018-02-01 09:38:30 UTC

I agree because teenagers spend too much time lounging around in their room and should spend more time outside playing. There social life is in despair and having TVs in their rooms' limits it even more. Would you want to spend your teenage days rotting away in the sleepy, solitary sad place of your duvet covers? The other day, at 10pm at night, I saw a blue flare arousing from a children's bedroom window! This is despicable because the next day it was a school day. In school they must of been very tired and wouldn't focuse nearly at all! A survey revealed that 83% of parents admitted that their children spend at least 4 hours on their TV everyday. If you really want a bright future for your child, You must throw their tvs away now!

Amber.

2018-02-01 09:38:30 UTC

I agree that teenagers shouldn’t have tv in there bedrooms because it could incorege them to stay up later and get less sleep 98% of parents agree that there children shouldn’t have a tv in there’s bedroom when I was a child we diddent even have tv it could also incorege them to watch inappropriate things whilst they could be out being adventurous,free and courageous do you really want your children adducted to screens and TVs?

This is a fabulous idea because it would encourage teenagers to do other things rather than staring at a screen. You know that by having a TVs in their room it would corrupt the poor children's souls so get outside and live a little!!

2018-02-01 09:38:31 UTC

Fox

Amber Kelly

2018-02-01 09:38:33 UTC

This is a good idea because the teenagers might become lazy and addicted to their screens, they wouldn’t get very much homework done, and they won’t exercise as much. When I was a child, children were playing outside, and not being grumpy, irritable TV addicts, don’t you think that would be better for them instead? They would also start going to bed much later, and have bad sleeping patterns.

Kaydan

2018-02-01 09:38:34 UTC

I agree with this because they should be more focused on doing revision and hanging out with they friends and watching tv makes people especially teens 40% more likely to become obese and not have a grade that could get them though life. It was just the other day that I saw a teenager in their window watching tv and they looked like they were there for 5 hours which is over three times the recommended amount of tv for a teenager daily.

Jowan

2018-02-01 09:38:41 UTC

Do we really need teenagers glued to a screen all day? They would get no exercise and would be moody at times. Back when I was a child, TVs were heavy, blocky and pale white in colour, there was no chance of even getting up the stairs.

Oban

2018-02-01 09:38:43 UTC

It is a bad idea for teenagers to have a tv in their rooms because it would encourage them to stay inside rather than going out and playing, do you really want your children to end up dumb and despondent? When I was young you never stayed inside when you could go out and play.

Keira🥑

2018-02-01 09:38:46 UTC

I agree because they could be watching rude things whilst no ones around. 95% if parents wake up tired, sleepy and angry because they have been hearing their children's TV all night. Do you really think that's good enough? Back in my day all we did was play I never the garden with my siblings, there was no such thing as a TV.

2018-02-01 09:38:54 UTC

Julian

Erin

2018-02-01 09:39:09 UTC

They would become more lazy and get distracted if they were supposed to be doing studying or homework. 96% of teenagers have a tv in their rooms.

Lily

2018-02-01 09:39:09 UTC

I agree because they wont sleep because they will always be watching tv. And they will become antisocial and and will refuse to leave the house. Do you want your teenagers inside all day? Your child will become lazy,ignorant and antisocial is this what you want for your child? 80% of teens have to much scream time do you seriously want to increase your child’s scream time And begin to damage there mental health.

Bryony

2018-02-01 09:39:10 UTC

I agree because if they have a tv in their room the will become very anti-social and won’t be encouraged to go outside. It is also restricting them to go and hang out with their friends. Do you want your child to become this monstrosity? It is despicable, delousinal and dastardly. You should be ashamed.

Zane

2018-02-01 09:39:40 UTC

This the foremost idea I have heard in a while! Teenagers should not be allowed to have a television in their bedroom. Imagine, an aborrent ,ominous world full of isolation; full of loneliness, with your only friend the solitary, silver square in the corner. When I was younger a social life was what I had alwaysed longed for... a chance at friends- a chance at a life. Now, thanks to you, our future will be marrooned in a detrimental, distraught, disaster: that seldom sees the light that is a social life. According to the child psychologist Steven Stevenson ‘children require social opportunities to excell in various activities’.

2018-02-01 09:39:44 UTC

Julian Tozer

It’s a great ideabecause the teenagers get off their backsides, open the door and take in a breath of fresh air

Maddy

2018-02-01 09:46:09 UTC

No one should have TV’s in their room as it is anti social and bad for your health. So go down to the charity shop and sell give your TV away! Don’t you see this will make everything better? Why let your child sit on their bum and stare at a screen all day when they can be upside and playing!

Hannah

2018-02-01 09:48:46 UTC

I think no teenagers should have TVs in there bedroom because it will stop them from doing revision because they will just want to watch tv and not do anything else like homework

2018-02-01 09:49:11 UTC

2018-02-01 09:50:05 UTC

Will
I am deeply against this disgusting idea because without tv teenagers wouldn’t know what to do with themselves, wandering around like mindless zombies not socialising or starting a conversation and tv is educational with programmes like the professor Ross eforp science show helping teenagers learn about science. In a survey of teenagers 3 in 5 said they would lose interest in science without professor Ross eforp. Furthermore without tv teenagers would lose out on education so let teenagers have a tv in their room while you still can.

Cody

2018-02-01 09:50:08 UTC

Tv is great. It is entertaining and educational. Professor Ross eforp tv expert says ‘ tv helps ecudaction to people in the comfort of their room’. He said that he took a test and he got the results that said 86% of people watch interesting, commendable and funny tv. Furthermore, scientists believe that children who watch tv are smarter than kids that read books. correct me if I’m wrong, but you want your child to be smart; don’t you? interestingly, parents don’t sit down and watch tv with their kids or just shut the tv off; what a stupid idea, don’t you think?

Mollie Laity

2018-02-01 09:50:17 UTC

Really? Correct me if I’m wrong but this idea is absurd, studies show that children get most of there knowledge from TV. For example shows such a Cbeebies and CBBC have a known impact on a child’s life because programmes such as, Mr bean,blue peter and paw patrol include heroic and ambitious characters that influence children to want to be like them and be a good person.

Rebecca

2018-02-01 09:50:24 UTC

Scientists have proven that 99.98629% of people that watch tv are smarter that other people that don’t. Doctor Fresco says that he makes his kids watch tv documentaries and they do really well in their tests. Does this change your mind?
This idea is good , great and gorgeous for the future generations. When I was a child we all had to fight over the TV and this caused an argument all the time. Really tho ? Who wants to sit with others watching a boring documentary or somthing when you can be watching the latest spider-man movie instead. But at least loads of people like MY idea.

Gus

2018-02-01 09:50:25 UTC

The idea that children shouldn’t have TVs in their rooms is ludicrous they should be able to play their friends they may become more social. A study has shown kids who tv are 82.7 percent smarter than children who are not allowed to watch tv. After a day of watching mr bean my son managed to learn the song on the piano without ever playing a piano before. Furthermore don’t you think absurd that children’s parents do not allow the to watch TV?! Also in my day without tv I had much lower grades than son does now. Correct me if I'm wrong but obviously no ones going to think your a bad parent letting your child watch tv 10 hours a day.

Ella

2018-02-01 09:50:25 UTC

Correct me if I’m wrong but think that this is a propustrus ludicrous horrific idea. The other day, I had an interview with professor Ross Eforp, his study’s show that children are much more intelligent when that watch television. So go and buy a television and put it in your child’s room.

Amelia

2018-02-01 09:50:25 UTC

This is an absolutely ludicrous idea because in recent research 95% of people who watch TV in their room are 80% smarter then children that don’t watch TVs in their room. Teenagers need to be able to relax and watching TV in their room would really help them and they wouldn’t have any stress from homework or parents nagging them. When I was younger we didn’t have a second many TVs as we do now and teenagers nowadays are smarter then me already. Do you seriously want our teenagers to become shortsighted, brainless and simple? Did you seriously think TV was bad? No? Didn’t think so.

This proposal is ludicrous, destructive and dastidly terrible as , I my-self, have interviewed Professor Plum a child therapist and he said that, intrestingly, 88% of the children we asked said tv was revolutionary. Furthermore, what's more educating than a tv? Did you really think that TVs were bad.No. That's what I thought.

2018-02-01 09:50:26 UTC

Fox

Oban

2018-02-01 09:50:28 UTC

This is an appalling idea because resent studies, carried out by Dr. Green, show that children end up 20% smarter when they watch over a hour of T.V. a day. Do you really think that they lied about the results? I thought so. Furthermore, teenagers need space and time, so having a T.V. in their rooms would give them that time

Katie

2018-02-01 09:50:28 UTC

Do you really think teenager should would get smarter by just studying? Well Professor Bandit said that from his test results it seems that teenagers will get smarter if they watch the television every day after school.” Furthermore children who watched Teletubbies as a child got amazing business jobswhen they were adults.

Amber.F

2018-02-01 09:50:41 UTC

This is a ludicrous law we asked a child therapist showed us that studies show that’s people who watch tv are 40% smarter than people who never watch tv my child watches tv all the time and when I was little we did not have tv and I was not very you smart but my children are

Julian

2018-02-01 09:50:55 UTC

This is appalling because studies show that 84% of kids showed better academic grades after watching a day of tv programmes such a short MR BEAN

Anson

2018-02-01 09:51:03 UTC

This is a ludicrous, abhorrent and stupid idea. Television can be an excellent education for your child. Today we have an expert with us, Professor Ross Eforp. "I would like to say that 76% of teenagers that watch TV are smarter and they get higher grades in school. In my opinion, the professor is correct. Not only is it a great education but it is also a fantastic source of entertainment. Has your child ever pestered you to play a game with them? Well that can change. Correct me if I am wrong but teenagers love television and it shuts them up. Alarmingly, 92% of teenagers watch TV but this isn't a problem.

Keira💕

2018-02-01 09:51:04 UTC

I disagree because children should have the independence and freedom to choose what you watch. In a recent scientific research is 100% clear that 89% of children that watch TV are 10 times smarter than those who don't. Furthermore back in my day me and my family had the choices to do what we wanted to. It was only the other day that complaints came through about children staring at a square screen for too long, how ludicrous! Do you really think that 1 hour is too long? No that's what I thought.

Amber Kelly

2018-02-01 09:51:07 UTC

This is an appalling idea, and I think that children should be allowed a TV in their room, TV therepists have found that, interestingly, a lot of children can relax while watching their favourite channels, this might help the child to feel better after a bad day at school, and it might help to educate the child, Obviously you wouldn’t ever catch them watching something too adult anyway. Don’t you think you should let them? When I was a child, me my family and my friends all loved to watch TV

Kaydan

2018-02-01 09:51:09 UTC

This is unacceptable this idea is ludicrous because it stops children’s imagination from going wild. Furthermore this is bad because it makes teenagers have to go out everyday of there life for entertainment and they can’t have a time to themselves. Most child physiologists agree that 75% of smart children have watched tv for over 10 hours a week and. Do you really think your child would turn down the opportunity to watch tv? This is what most physiologists say.

Mia

2018-02-01 09:51:16 UTC

I disagree that teenagers shouldn't have TV in their room because they should be able to have the freedom to make their own decisions and have the independence to have something they don't have to share. Resent results show that TV give children 40% of their knowledge. Do you really want nearly half your childs knowledge gone? I didn't think so.

Jowan

2018-02-01 09:51:21 UTC

I believe that this is a ludicrous law because teenagers need space, they need their privacy. Don't you want your child to grow up? Recent research has shown that 7/10 children who watch TV are smarter, more independent and aware of the world Than others by the age of 16. Furthermore, they would be able to communicate with friends directly from their television due to advances in technology.

Lily

2018-02-01 09:51:29 UTC

TV is educational as proven by professor John Golding his recent study’s have shown that when children watch tv their educational knowledge increases by atleast 60% why wouldn’t you want this for your child? Think about it when we were children there wasn’t as many tv s as there now as a result of that childrens test resualts have increased by 75%. Correct me if I’m wrong but any responsible parent would want the best for there child, wouldn’t they? So get out your money go to the shops, and buy your child a TV.

Maddy

2018-02-01 09:51:36 UTC

Professer Owen Thomas, child cycolagist agrees that 65% of teenagers are more intelligent when they watch they have watched the TV! He has recently done a survey which came out with the results we have been waiting for....... he tested 100 children just after they had watched TV and the next day without any TV at all! Don’t you see letting you’re child watch TV is better for their health? Go down to the local supermarket and get your self a TV weather it’s a LG or just one of those tiny little things people had in the olden days, it doesn’t matter! David Atinburgh doesn’t do Blue Planet for any reason, he wants to inspire our next generation! Correct me if I make wrong but whenever Cebbies comes on the TV the children’s faces brighten up, do you really want to take that’s away from them? No I didn’t think so.

George

2018-02-01 09:52:05 UTC

I disagree because children must have their freedom, independence make choices themselves. Mr bean is an entertaining programme and must make children feel happy. Furthermore, the modern era is moving into a new stage of technology and children must know how to use electronics and TVs. Would you really want your child to not be able to cop and handle modern jobs? I wouldn't think so. The entrancing, enlighting and entertaining to device really sparks the children's imagination to the extreme. Professor Snave explained that relaxing at watching TV is very good for children's health and well being. Additionally, after a hard days work at school, Prof Snave states that TV is a good way to relax and calm the brain. 98% of teenagers say that watching TV calms them. You must let teenagers have TVs in their rooms!

Tobias

2018-02-01 09:52:10 UTC

No TV?? No CBeebies!!? Well the idea to not have a tv is absolutely ludicrous!! 2018 top scientist Professor Ross eforp said “only 12% of the population have never watch CBeebies... I mean the TV”. This means that people won’t get a better education than all of the other kids. Did you really think that children would get intelligent without a TV... you thought wrong.

Hannah

2018-02-01 09:52:10 UTC

Really? I think that this is a ludicrous idea it is some times a good idea for teenagers to watch tv because they can relax in the evenings and they can do revision with the tv on whilst revising. And children do need a brake they are at school for 6 hours and then they go home straight away to do homework. I bet that 85% of you all agree! Correct me info I am wrong but a tv does shut a teenager up. This idea is stupidly satisfying.It is almost laughable.

Erin

2018-02-01 09:52:25 UTC

I believe that this is a bad idea because studies completed by child therapists, show that 96% of children and teenagers feel comforted by tv. Correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t you prefer it if your child is calm when you turn on the tv after a busy day? Also it is known that tv increases your child’s knowledge. Are you the kind of parent to limit your child’s knowledge?

Cory

2018-02-01 09:52:30 UTC

This ludicrous idea is terrible because tv is an amazing way to learn.correct me if I'm wrong, but 78% of people lean more from a day of watching tv than they do in a day of school. Furthermore, It could help them relax after a stressful day and entertain them when they're bored. Interestingly, tv can cover all topics , and that's what makes it so good.

Bryony

2018-02-01 09:53:31 UTC

I think that having a tv in teenagers rooms would give them something Tom work for afternoon doing homework. They would do there homework properly and efficiently, and would also keep them occupied for a few hours. You could have a smiling, happy teenager instead of a grumpy Kevin. Like, really, everyone wants go outside and kick around a football.

2018-02-01 09:54:12 UTC

2018-02-01 09:54:21 UTC

ZANe
Evidently, this is a preposterous, preposition to bestow upon our corrupt society. Children need a television to enhance their abilities such as: their senses; their hand eye co-ordination an de just their intelligence in general. Furthermore, according to child psychiatrist Dr. Patel ‘ Television enhances our adolescence’s intelligence and their generation a social it also provides numerous social opportunities as well.’ In my humble opinion, if this ludicrous law is enforced you will withdraw all of these advancements from our future. Do you really want that; didn’t think so? Alarmingly, 88.74% of teenagers reguire entertainment to further their education of which’s curriculum seldom sees a change. Well stop! Let’s make a change now!

F

2018-02-01 09:58:03 UTC

2018-02-01 09:58:13 UTC

Farts

2018-02-01 09:58:36 UTC

Farts

2018-02-01 10:01:53 UTC

Wiz Kahlifa

2018-02-01 10:02:47 UTC

Farming something that is very nice

Mollie Laity

2018-02-01 10:08:32 UTC

Although it may be suggested that having a TV in a teenagers room is an absolutely absurd , everyone knows that there going to be obviously watching the geographical programmes and Blue Peter to learn.

Anson

2018-02-01 10:08:49 UTC

Some parents/carers may think that their child having a television is expensive, yes, but it is worth it. Let's face it, everyone, kids and adults, love and watch TV around the globe.

Gus

2018-02-01 10:09:04 UTC

Some people may argue that letting a teenager have a tv in their room for educational purposes is beneficial but let’s face it teenagers aren’t going to watch Discovery Channel they will being watching horror movie so like IT and The Conjuring. And won’t sleep for nights after terrified whilst tucked up in bed.

Keira✨

2018-02-01 10:09:23 UTC

Although some people may feel that their children need a television in their room for more education purposes, let's face it it's no that's like your children are going to be upstairs sitting In their room watching some sort of historical movie, do you really think that? What they will be watchng is something more like Annabelle. You have to admit children really don't need a TV in their room

Cody

2018-02-01 10:09:25 UTC

some may argue that having a tv in their is educational but kids aren’t going to watch that are they? They’re going to be up there watch the 6 Nightmare on Elm Street films or other horror films. Do you want your kids watching that? I didn’t think so.

Lily

2018-02-01 10:09:25 UTC

Some people may argue that children should have a tv in their room for educational purposes, let’s face it children arn’t exactly going’s to be watching anything educational they will only use it for watching horror movies and inappropriate programmes, not only this, but it will also spoil there imagination and defeat there social lives. Others will argue that’s this is a good idea because it will increase there knowledge and help them concentrate better in lessons

Bryony💞💗💓

2018-02-01 10:09:27 UTC

Some people say letting your children always sit in front of a screen is bad for their social relationships, but do you really want to have to handle the wrath of a moody teen? You know they’re not going to be watching a documentary or National Geographic. They are probably watching It and other horror films.

Fox

2018-02-01 10:09:28 UTC

Some insane minds may believe that having a tv is a splendiferous idea but , let's face it, are they really going to be watching Steve Backshalls nature channels. No.

Ella

2018-02-01 10:09:29 UTC

Although some people may argue that children need a television in their room for educational purpose, everybody knows that they will not be watching Blue Peter or national geographic they will be watching an inappropriate tv program. So let’s face it what’s the point of having a television in their room.

Kaydan

2018-02-01 10:09:33 UTC

Some people may argue that children’s need it for educational needs but do you think your child would watch Natural Geographic, they would most likely watch Freddy Krueger and Friday the 13th and other horror movies like that. Furthermore Who would watch tv for educational reasons because books are for that type of stuff.

Hannah

2018-02-01 10:09:34 UTC

Some People may say that letting your teenager have a TV is absolutely ludicrous, but that is debatable. Some teenagers may use there tv for educational purposes. I know you mightn’t have a slight suspicions that your child is watching something completely un impropriet but you have to Have some trust in you teenager.

Amelia

2018-02-01 10:09:36 UTC

Some people may argue that we are bad parents for letting our children watch TV in their room for educational reasons, although everybody knows that they will stay up later. Correct me if I’m wrong but they won’t be watching a documentary or a nature programme, we all know that they willl be watching some other inappropriate or a scary horror programme

Katie🐺🐺

2018-02-01 10:09:40 UTC

Some people may argue that it gets rid of the social life, although, it also helps teenagers to relieve stress.

Maddy

2018-02-01 10:10:01 UTC

Some people may argue that letting your child watch TV is good as they will be watching Blue Planet or National Geographic, but let’s face it there never going to watch that when’s they’ve got The Goldberg’s staring right at them! Don’t you agree? I know what you are thinking, just set the TV to only play National Geoghraphic. But do you really want to hear the bored groans of your child when’s your trying to have a relaxing night in?

ZANe

2018-02-01 10:10:07 UTC

Apparently, ‘tv provides educational purposes to teenagers’ although that mat be suggested it is completely preposterous! Television tears away teenagers dignity and as their integrity chips away bit by bit your bank account balance will take a declining, detrimental, downfall. Furthermore, according to statistics from the national Santander bank 90.45% of parents spend hundreds of pounds on televisions and equipment for them. Would you like your bank account to suffer: no didn’t think so.

Cory

2018-02-01 10:10:08 UTC

Some people may think that children need TVs in their rooms for educational purposes. But this also gives them access to things that are inappropriate . Let's face it, no child is going to want a TV in their room so that they can watch the Discovery Channel. They're going to be watching things like Friday the 13th or the worlds end.

Julian

2018-02-01 10:10:29 UTC

Some people may argue that the suggested arguments are a load of what ever you want to call it, but correct me if im wrong but do you really think that kids are going to be in their room watching national geographic! But on the other hand it keeps kids quiet but EVERYONE Knows! Kids stay up late watching prime time tv! Do you want this to happen! To corrupt their minds!?

Amber fernie

2018-02-01 10:10:42 UTC

Some people may argue that children will watch inappropriate things like the walking dead there’s not going to be in there bedrooms watching blue peater trust me!

Mia

2018-02-01 10:11:02 UTC

Some people may argue that letting children watch TV is educational and correct me if I'm wrong but children aren't going to be watching the discovery channel, are they? Let's face it everyone knows what they're really be watching.

George

2018-02-01 10:11:26 UTC

Although some people may think that children need TVs in their rooms for beneficial purposes, would they really be watching national geographic or Blue Peter? Correct me I feel I'm wrong but teenagers are into reality TV such as MTV. Many programme shows have inappropriate content which could change their personality and style.

Erin

2018-02-01 10:12:02 UTC

Some people may argue that children need a tv in their rooms for “ educational purposes, let’s face who’s going to be watching blue planet, the history channel or national geographic?! The will probably be watching horror movies, or programs for adults! Another reason why it is a bad idea for children and teenagers to have TVs in their rooms is the environment. Let’s face it, humans have killed the environment enough already, if every child and teenager have a tv in their room, just think what will happen!

Will

2018-02-01 10:12:02 UTC

Some people may believe teenagers need a tv for educational purposes but they are clearly not going to watch itv’s good morning Britain cough cough everyone hates Piers Morgan cough cough or antiques roadshow they will watch inappropriate films like the shining or the conjuring these film are both 18s so don’t buy your teenager a tv or this is what will happen.

Oban

2018-02-01 10:12:20 UTC

Some people may argue that a T.V. is beneficial but lets face it, children won't be watching National Geografic until seven o'clock, they will all be watching 'It 2' til one o'clock in the morning. 8/10 teenagers wake up with only 5 hours of sleep to get them through the day.

Amber Kelly

2018-02-01 10:12:48 UTC

Some people may argue that children need a TV to help with education, but let’s face it... do you really think that they would be watching the educational types of channels? I didn’t think so. All having a TV will do is give them privacy so you don’t know they are potentially watching horror movies, and staying up all night, without their homework done.

Tobias

2018-02-01 10:15:52 UTC