Debates 4° D by valentina duarte

Pro something (your name)

valeduna — 2022-08-16 20:37:56 UTC

I will introduce the topic. What this is about.

Argument 1: (you can use sources)

Argument 2:(you can use sources)

Against something (your name)

valeduna — 2022-08-16 20:38:28 UTC

I will introduce the topic. What this is about.

Argument 1: (you can use sources)

Argument 2:(you can use sources)

Counter argument 1 (pro)

valeduna — 2022-08-16 20:38:49 UTC

I will reply to the arguments presented by "red"

Counter argument 1 (against)

valeduna — 2022-08-16 20:39:20 UTC

I will reply to the arguments presented by "Green"

Reply to counter argument

valeduna — 2022-08-16 20:40:57 UTC

I will provide a reply to the counterargument presented by the counterpart.

Reply to counter argument

valeduna — 2022-08-16 20:41:09 UTC

I will provide a reply to the counterargument presented by the counterpart.

Conclusion

valeduna — 2022-08-16 20:43:08 UTC

I will close the topic considering the information presented

Conclusion

valeduna — 2022-08-16 20:43:19 UTC

I will close the topic considering the information presented

Debate AI

yasnaavalentinaa — 2022-08-18 14:12:32 UTC

Pro something (Matias Donaire, Camila Valenzuela)

dhealthysnacks — 2022-08-18 14:53:50 UTC

At times like these, discussions have begun on various issues that generate relevance in our society, such as sending homework from schools, becoming a great dilemma to know if this is really beneficial or not for students in relation to their performance in the academic environment and how it influences their daily life. For our part, we will now present some benefits of sending homework:
1. They help to be more independent and autonomous people, since through the experience acquired by carrying out these activities, learning and responsibility are better developed.
2. In addition to allowing us to begin to organize ourselves better by fulfilling obligations or objectives that will generate certain long-term life habits that will help us act effectively as people in the future.

Pro something(Antonia figueroa y Nicolas toledo

nicolastoledo212 — 2022-08-18 14:55:52 UTC

We are going to present if schools should ban the use of cell phones. With the passage of time and the advancement of technology, several technological objects have appeared that facilitate daily life, one of them is cell phones, however, it can also cause many problems thanks to its massive use, especially in schools. Cell phones should be banned in schools, the arguments in favor of this thesis are the distractions in the classroom and the increase in cyberbullying

Argument 1: " A recent survey of teachers highlights the benefits of technology in the classroom, however, it reveals that smartphones cause constant interruptions and tension. On the contrary, 70% of teachers think that smartphones have an impact negative in the classroom, teachers point out that smartphones create stress in students and constantly interrupt classroom work. 50% said they deal with interruptions weekly and 36% said interruptions are daily." https://observatorio.tec.mx/edu-news/los-smartphones-son-una-distraccion-en-el-salon-de-clase
Argument 2: In these times the use of cell phones in classrooms is massive, this use could be for bad intentions: cyberbullying. Students use cell phones to send messages (often anonymously) and videos to harass or threaten other students. In addition, cyberbullying is dangerous because it spreads false rumours, the victims cannot defend themselves and it can cause psychological disorders in the victim. Personally, we believe this is a serious problem as it ruins the healthy environment in the classroom and increases violence, in addition, a study indicates that in the last two years, 50% of young people between 15 and 19 years old suffered this type of harassment at least once. https://idealex.press/ciberbullying-pandemia-y-nuevos-desafios/

against something (diego muñoz e Isidora Vega)

dhealthysnacks — 2022-08-18 14:57:42 UTC

The tasks and activities at home have been a great debate between teachers, students and parents, questioning the effectiveness and if it is beneficial to carry them out, so our position is against them.
1. Over time it has been shown that these are not effective, in addition to taking away a fundamental right of children and young people to "a healthy and safe life." That frames the rest, the game, the practice of sports, the contact with nature and the meeting with friends (leisure), rights that limit the duties and activities of the home.

2. According to the children's guide, the concentration time of children according to their age is from 10 to 45 minutes between 5 to 9 years old and from 20 to 50 minutes from 10 years old, this considering an environment conducive to concentration . At home you cannot find this adequate environment since there is currently a wide range of entertainment (television, internet, video games, among others). those that generate many more stimuli in children, reducing their continuous attention, so concentration times decrease considerably, in addition to noise affecting our health, children are especially affected since they harm growth hormones, concentration and comprehension ability.

Pro something (Camila Paredes - Ignacio Gutiérrez)

igt52005 — 2022-08-18 15:01:26 UTC

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly present in our lives. A good definition of it is the combination of algorithms, which try to simulate some actions of humans or better yet, go beyond human intelligence. As group B, we believe that artificial intelligence does pose a danger to society, due to the risks involved, finding three main ones: accidents, misuse and arms races. Artificial intelligence systems sometimes malfunction.

Cognitive overcoming over the human being

The AI that works today is known as narrow AI or weak AI, as it is designed to perform a specific task, such as facial recognition or internet searches. However, the long-term goal of many researchers is to create general AI or strong AI. To give you an understanding of the magnitude of its potential: Strong AI would outperform humans in almost all cognitive tasks, such as memory and language, which would have a clear impact and increase in unemployment rates within our society.

Unintended consequences

Artificial intelligence (AI) is proving to be a double-edged sword. While AI generates consumer benefits and business value, it is also leading to a number of unintended and sometimes serious consequences.

The most visible, which include privacy violations, discrimination, accidents and manipulation of political systems, disastrous repercussions, including loss of human life, if an AI medical algorithm fails or the compromise of national security.

Taking into account the arguments presented and the risks mentioned we realize the lack of legislation on AIs. It is a very serious problem, as there is no clear answer to unjustified dismissals, privacy violations or accidents due to artificial intelligences. It takes a long time to create new legislation, and by the time it is in place, it is too late because the technology will have already evolved.

Against something (Magdalena Pascal, Martin Hernández)

magadalenapascal — 2022-08-18 15:03:03 UTC

Our topic to discuss is whether "artificial intelligence is dangerous?" so in our group we are in a debate about whether it is or not, but first of all…What is artificial intelligence?-Artificial intelligence is, in computer science, the discipline that tries to replicate and develop intelligence and its implicit processes through computers. Bearing this in mind, one of our arguments why artificial intelligence is NOT dangerous is because:

Increased productivity and quality in production AI not only increases productivity at the machinery level, but also increases the productivity of workers and the quality of the work they do. Being able to enjoy more information allows them to have a more focused vision of their work and make better decisions.

Reduces human error; by reducing the intervention of humans in certain processes, it eliminates the possibilities that they can make mistakes. For example, a typo when entering data in the accounting of a business.

Against something: Catalina Gálvez, Constanza Devia.

ConiD — 2022-08-18 15:08:13 UTC

Based on different investigation through informative pages, we think that the use of electronic devices in school can be favorable to promote student learning more effectively.

Argument 1: In important countries like USA, Russia, Germany, Italy, etc. where their use is not prohibited, the use of mobile phones are considered as an educational tool or for didactic purposes, under the responsibility of the teacher in charge. We can support this idea on a study on how the use of mobile phones influences learning of devices in school: this aims to benefit both parts of the educational environment, teachers and students, helping to meet their needs, such as improving learning, teaching efficiently, among others.
Links:
https://revistas.elpoli.edu.co/index.php/pol/article/view/1702/1415
https://www.latercera.com/que-pasa/noticia/como-se-legisla-el-uso-de-celulares-en-los-colegios/aRGUMENT
Argument 2:
The academic of the School of Pedagogy in Basic General Education with Mention of the Catholic University of Maule, Curicó, Alejandro Espinoza, makes an analysis regarding the use of these technological devices in the classroom. And he proposes giving them a positive use, where it is seen as a positive use because the world is a technological place and we should not take it away from young people. We firmly believe in the idea that schools have to teach under the logic that we are in the 21st century, where the presence of technology, media, screens, are very omnipresent in our society, therefore, schools do not they can be abstracted from this reality. If we see our students in the classroom, we will realize that 100% have a cell phone, and that reality must be used in a positive way and for the benefit of learning.
Link:
https://portal.ucm.cl/noticias/uso-celulares-la-sala-clase-enemigo-aliado-la-hora-ensenar

Counter argument 1 (pro)

igt52005 — 2022-08-18 15:12:32 UTC

The implementation of AI in the labor field will increase the rate of unemployment in society, due to the overcoming of the human being and we will be exposed to failures of catastrophic scope due to errors within the AI algorithms.

Counter argument:

nicolastoledo212 — 2022-08-18 15:16:34 UTC

One of the weaknesses of using thew phones is the use of the internet and in a classsroom of the 40 students a single teacher does not have the capacity to supervise each child on her phone

Pro somethings (Valentina Basulto y Alejandro Herrera)

antinaocris — 2022-08-18 15:22:27 UTC

We are going to talk about the AI, that means artificial intelligence, is it dangerous or not? The AI is a computation science, is the discipline that trys to replies and develop intelligence and their process through computers. And is very dangerous.

Counter argument 1 (against)

magadalenapascal — 2022-08-18 15:23:15 UTC

It speeds up decision making since artificial intelligence is capable of analyzing thousands of data in just minutes and also takes into account possible updates of the same. Well-synthesized and updated information helps professionals to make strategic decisions.
This information is corroborated by this website

And the risks of AI "dominating" the labor fields is very unlikely, but AI only does precision jobs such as cutting, vehicle construction, etc. In Spain there is a 11.7% that some jobs will be replaced by AI, so it is so far too low to be unemployed by AI.

This information is corroborated by this website

Against something (Maickol Ulloa y Cristobal Antinao)

antinaocris — 2022-08-18 15:25:19 UTC

The AI is often confused with a robot but is not this, not like show us in the movies or series, is not something necessarily physical, for example, the medical machines, the “machine” in videogames or Alexa.

Argument 1 and 2

antinaocris — 2022-08-18 15:28:08 UTC

1. Well, we think is dangerous, because the artificial technology in medicine has had many failures such as ventilators that fail and can even cause the death of the patient, in addition to the software failure that has been presented in different contexts and occasions. And this information is extracted from the page “Socienee”.

2. Also I think that, because the AI will "steal' jobs to humans, the mostly. What will cause that we become lazy and dependents to machines. The Adecco group and the Instituto Cuatrecasas de Estrategia legal in RRHH (human resources) have made more than 200 interviews qualitative and quantitative to human resources directors and they said: the 25% thinks AI will be a threat for the employment and humans.

Argument 1 and 2

antinaocris — 2022-08-18 15:29:14 UTC

1. We think is not dangerous because the AI is an aport for the society, since in the humans activities, ever we have a big margin of error, and with the use of the AI that margin is less, and that is not dangerous, at the contrary, is beneficial, that we found in the “nexusintegra” and “winecta”, web page.

2. Another point is the AI have the limitation of the programmation, and this is give from the professional developer, with a good formation, also, that don't have conscience, and if the developer can't programm that, is impossible that the produce, so, is don't dangerous the false conscience of the AI, and that information is from the webpage “IA Latam”.

pro something ( Martin Cárcamo y Rocío Gálvez)

rogalvezgarcia — 2022-08-18 15:29:25 UTC

our mind is the main influencer in our actions for all kinds of things. In our opinion, video games have helped many people to cope with some situation that they are going through. Video games do not have to be a focus that generates violence since our research has shown that. We rely on different studies carried out over time.

Argument 1: video games as an escape from the reality that the player lives.

A study developed over 10 years has studied the behavior of a group of adolescents who have played grand theft auto, where it was shown that they do not generate violent behavior.

This study compared the behavior of adolescents who played grand theft auto and others who did not, the final results of the study showed that those who played for several hours did not present violent behavior, although it was possible to conclude that the game of these adolescents may be related to a method of escape to mental health problems.

Argument 2:

Mental health is the main factor that leads to the development of violent attitudes.

Throughout time, different types of violent acts have always existed in our society, even before video games, but thanks to science we will be able to clarify why.

Reports affirm that since 1996, crimes committed by minors have been declining, so much so that since the last 25 years the rate of arrests of young people has fallen by 72%. "sentencingproject.org"

The vast majority of studies on the violent use of video games do not correlate violence in the real world. They are observations and not proofs of cause and effect.

However, psychologists Dr.Patrick Markey and Dr.Charlotte Markey, after investigating these problems, concluded that the combination of three personality traits are the possible cause of an individual acting and thinking aggressively after playing violent video games. Of these traits, a high neurocism, unpleasant attitudes and low levels of conscientiousness were identified. "health.harvard.edu"

Counter argument

antinaocris — 2022-08-18 15:30:13 UTC

It is true, it's no doubt that is beneficial for the society but those margin of error increases over time, and they can be news failures more difficult than the olders, which can cause failures a global nivel at any time and provoque many dangerous troubles to humans and this is said for Sociedad Científica de Enfermeras Especialistas en Esterilización of Peru.

Respond counter argument 1

antinaocris — 2022-08-18 15:31:01 UTC

If that is true in one point, but that have a solution, with actualizations, that can be periodical, every year, month, week, etc, with be necessary, that we can see in the “rexroth” blog.

Counter argument 1 (pro)

dhealthysnacks — 2022-08-18 15:31:19 UTC

Through the analysis of various studies, it is evident how sending homework benefits students by allowing them to deepen and reinforce the knowledge acquired in class, in addition to generating habits and a positive attitude towards studying in children. According to the Editor of Editorial Caligrafix, “They serve to develop abilities and skills, imagination and creativity, they also promote the development of study habits, organization of time and attitudes such as discipline and commitment. The more consistent and focused children are on their homework, the better they will do in school and the more academic benefits they will gain as they progress to higher grades. Finally, homework also serves to inform parents about the education their children are receiving, as well as to improve communication and relationships between them. It allows parents to participate and have moments to collaborate with their children's education, showing interest in what they do and affection”.
This demonstrate that homeworks are good for students, but without subtracting from the fact that an excess of these can always be very harmful, but sending even one is not proven by any study that harm them.

Counter argument 1

antinaocris — 2022-08-18 15:31:48 UTC

In that point of view, is certain, but that jobs is the repetitive and hard, with big charges in the health of the employers, so, that people, can be educated in better jobs, with a less charge physical or mental, and dedicated to a creative activities, that is from the “nexusintegra” webpage.

Against something (Laurin Sánchez, Florencia Muñoz)

laurindragneel17 — 2022-08-18 15:32:20 UTC

In our current society, the videogames are entertainment for children and adolescents. The Videogames are divided into genres and ages, classifying them as "A" for content suitable for all audiences and "C" for content suitable for adults only.
According to a market study carried out by NPD group statis, we can know that shooting and action video games (FPS) correspond to 50% of the most purchased made in 2016 in the USA, also discovering that adolescents are the ones who buy this genre the most.

°As a first point, Age ratings in video games are not effective, according to a survey conducted by "Vandal" 80% of respondents mention that the PEGI code does not work and confess to having played violent games under the required age.

°As second point, The OMS mentioned about the increase in the desire to play and its priority when playing it and forgetting about other activities. Everyday video games play a more important role in the lives of adolescents, who do not stop or rest for hours even though negative consequences appear such as mental disorders, behavioral or neurological development.

Respond counter argument 1

antinaocris — 2022-08-18 15:32:28 UTC

It takes away the possibility for people without work and without study to generate a base to be able to progress in their studies or pay for it themselves, since they cannot opt for a better job due to lack of study. This is said for “Lab.elmundo.es” webpage.

counter argument 1 (against)

dhealthysnacks — 2022-08-23 15:01:16 UTC

The WHO warns: “School-related stress tends to be suffered by young people with high levels of school pressure and is characterized by an increase in behaviors that put health at risk, more frequent health problems (headache, abdominal pain , back pain and dizziness) and psychological symptoms, such as feeling sad, tense or nervous“
as well as studies and surveys show us that students learn through recreational activities or that motivate their learning, so a task or activity that they must perform by obligation demotivates them, this also generates that school tasks create tension between parents and children, complicating family life and causing conflict and punishment,
lack of free time to dedicate to their children and to carry out recreational activities that increase attention and the ability to solve problems.

Conclussion pro

2022-08-23 15:10:07 UTC

We conclude, that despite the improvements it may have, there is still a risk of mortality, wich cannot be run since the lives of people are at stake and there is no one to support them in the face of an error of this type.

Counter Argument 1 (Against):

cgalvezg15 — 2022-08-23 15:15:27 UTC

Smartphones provide great motivation when you are learning, so the teacher in charge can allow their use when this use is appropriate, since they can create a distraction as such. Therefore, as I said before, the teacher can allow their use and then store it in a box to avoid distractions or other inconveniences.

Conclussion against

2022-08-23 15:15:49 UTC

We conclude that although there is enough margin of error, these errors always decrease over time, so little by little it is perfected, it ends up being more of a contribution than a danger.

Counter Argument (Pro)

sepulvedas560 — 2022-08-23 15:25:32 UTC

We all would like to work on the job we dream, or at leats, on the occupation we like, and it is a fact, 85% of the students that are professional, works on a formal job about their profession, and they win a 58% more than a not professional. how is this not taken as a better oportunity than others?

Reply to counter argument:

nicolastoledo212 — 2022-08-23 15:27:01 UTC

Cell phones are considered valuable objects with a high cost, so they are quite vulnerable to theft, this can cause the theft of valuable information from the owner and even the integrity of the student himself.

Counter Argument (Against)

sepulvedas560 — 2022-08-23 15:28:17 UTC

We know that college provides you a lot of tools, but, What about the professionals that are jobless? I could use as example some persons who came from bad situation, and they could have a good economic situation. This explains that the capital may be achieved without a degree.

Elon Musk: when he hadn't studied yet, he sold a videogame

Amancio Ortega: Sara's owner, his begginings were making shirts.

Reply to counter argument

ConiD — 2022-08-23 15:33:30 UTC

As our colleagues argue, "The teacher in charge is not trained to supervise 40 students," but the teacher takes care of 40 students every day, in addition, most of the students understand when they should do an activity or look for information to answer their activities, because the internet is always necessary, both for students and teachers. The use of the cellphone in class is necessary as long as the student understands his/her duties as a student.

Conclussion

nicolastoledo212 — 2022-08-23 15:56:07 UTC

In clocunsion the use of the telephone is not something that should be taken lightly since its consequences include cyberbullying, distractions in classes, it also endangers the information and physical integrity of the student and a possible addiction.

Conclusión

ConiD — 2022-08-23 16:05:27 UTC

The two of us can conclude that it is not necessary to ban electronic devices at school because their use is considered an educational tool and for didactic purposes, suitable for the progress and learning of the student. In addition, the world, over the years, made a technological place where most of the students have mobile phones, so they shouldn't be banned altogether.

Counter argument 2

2022-08-23 16:07:35 UTC

Reiterating and finalizing the issue of AI overcoming the human in the labor field, in the long term the idea of using artificial intelligence in general, which will cover all types of work, where perfection and speed are sought, this will change many jobs, in addition, there is no regulatory body or laws for the creators of AI, leaving completely up in the air the regularization of important issues such as limitations on the creation of the same, accidents due to system failures, violation of privacy or unjustified dismissals by companies to their workers to implement AI.

this information is taken from:
https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/articulos/inteligencia-artificial-y-futuro-del-trabajo-perspectiva-china/

Pro somenthing(Benjamin Urbina-Juan José Palavecino)

2022-08-23 16:30:19 UTC

Since the beggins of times the technolgy was be in the mind of the human for all things when the human was primitive, let's think since the life of the human being was dangerous, he must develop your skills and habilities to have solutions for this problems, we can say the technology make smater people.

· As a first argument we take into consideration the various studies carried out that comment that the human being has increased 3 point in itellect that previous generations. Thanks to technology we such a complex and structured society, there are also terms that accompany the intelligence of the human, such is the flynn effect.

https://www.anafernandezpinilla.com/cada-generacion-mas-inteligente/

· Everithing that technology present is much more complex so the human being must develop he thinhing to really understand what he observes or see. Also everithing presented by technology tende to be impregnated in the human mind.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02147033.1992.10820997

Reply to counter argument

magadalenapascal — 2022-08-23 16:33:29 UTC

So far no "domination" has been detected in the work that requires and needs precision, while on the "privacy violations", each person has the option to read the terms and conditions of privacy to see if he agrees with what is proposed or not, because what sometimes misunderstandings arise from the fact of not having read as it corresponded the suggested terms.

Pro somethings(Benjamín Urbina-Juan Jose Palavecino)

juanjoeppavez — 2022-08-23 21:30:32 UTC

Since the beggins of times the technolgy was be in the mind of the human for all things when the human was primitive, let's think since the life of the human being was dangerous, he must develop your skills and habilities to have solutions for this problems, we can say the technology make smater people.

1.-As a first argument we take into consideration the various studies carried out that comment that the human being has increased 3 point in itellect that previous generations. Thanks to technology we such a complex and structured society, there are also terms that accompany the intelligence of the human, such is the flynn effect.

https://www.anafernandezpinilla.com/cada-generacion-mas-inteligente/

2.-Everithing that technology present is much more complex so the human being must develop he thinhing to really understand what he observes or see. Also everithing presented by technology tende to be impregnated in the human mind.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02147033.1992.10820997

Against something(Abraham Palma-Dylan Reyes)

juanjoeppavez — 2022-08-23 21:33:49 UTC

When the use of technology begins, there was a radical change both for humanity and for the world, technology is a beginning never seen before and that we can currently observe its evolution for both good and bad use. We can present the good use of technology in medicine for example: machines, advanced laboratories etc, and for the misuse in nuclear weapons, an advanced technology that could end humanity.

1.-technology does not make us more intelligent, it is only a tool, since it has affected man in many ways, it can be said that it is a threat to humanity because it makes them dependent.

2.-The man has developed technology as an aid to civilize, acquire more knowledge, expand their social relationship. but some people use it incorrectly and abuse them killing and creating threats to humanity then the world could be in crisis

Counter Argument 1 (pro)

juanjoeppavez — 2022-08-23 21:36:40 UTC

1.- We must understand that technological use has many facet, where someone can think that technology is useless, but for other can be a great development opportunity.

2.-Affirmatively there are postúlate that mention the techonolgy make us more foolish and dependent, but, I have tos ay that we are all free to commit stupiditis, however one does not take away the other despite all the conforts we have today is not demostrative that we are stupid, but that we are beings adaptable to change. We need to separate technology them human consciousness.
https://www.investigacionyciencia.es/noticias/la-tecnologa-inteligente-no-nos-hace-ms-tontos-20079

https://www.diariodesevilla.es/tecnologia/tecnologia-no-haciendo-tontos_0_1590441847.html

Counter argument 1 (against)

juanjoeppavez — 2022-08-23 21:38:35 UTC

1.-Could we sow the doubt that today's people are more intelligent than the people of ancient generations? considering that they had much more obstacles to solve problems than today. the past created the technology while we use it.

2.-Although technology contributes to the intelligence of the human, although this postulates does not assure us that he takes advantage of his knowledge learned with technology, even this is wasted, in the air without utility.

Reply to counter argument

juanjoeppavez — 2022-08-23 21:41:52 UTC

1.-indeed, the intelligence of ancient times is palpable, because of the various obstacules they have overcome, but the fact that we do not have these obstacules today is not negative, it speak very well of us that today we have improved past model.

2.-Although the technology is considered useless, it is a tool to pose problems, example the social networks, since the latter us away from real world, but we are able to understand the problema an live wiht it.

Reply to counter argument

juanjoeppavez — 2022-08-23 21:43:18 UTC

1- in effect, we must differentiate human knowledge and technology, but we must emphasize one thing from the other. human consciousness uses technology uselessly despite these two concepts are distances, talking about the human being is adaptive. Are these adaptations really good for us?.

2- that although there are many people who use technology well, the problem is that a large majority in the world use it negatively.

Conclusion

juanjoeppavez — 2022-08-23 21:45:15 UTC

To solve this dilema in a simpler way we must look around, and admit that thanks to everithing we have today is the result of becoming smater progressing wiht technology, to say otherwise is to undervalue our intelligence.

Conclusion

juanjoeppavez — 2022-08-23 21:45:53 UTC

In my opinion, my arguments and my counterarguments had a greater certainty in my position of being against. even the counterpart of the posture could know some of the negativity in the technology.

Couter Argumet 1 (pro)

rogalvezgarcia — 2022-08-23 23:56:11 UTC

As the research was carried out around adolescents, the issue of age restriction does not influence this issue since most adolescents are of a suitable age to know what they are playing. If we come across the case that the player is a minor, the game can be supervised by the parents and between them they can also agree on the time limit that is sprent playing.

Counter Argument 1 (Against)

laurindragneel17 — 2022-08-24 00:08:38 UTC

the coordinator of the Addictive Disorders Clinic of the National Institute of Psychiatry, Hugo González Cantú mentions that, spending many hours a day playing video games can lead to a sedentary lifestyle, reduction of coexistence with the family and friends, causes the "abandonment" of academic activities.
It is estimated that about four percent of young people who spend a lot of time playing video games have characteristics of those who are chemically dependent.

Reply to counter argument

rogalvezgarcia — 2022-08-24 00:32:58 UTC

Recent studies from the university of oxford (Uk) suggets playing time is less than 1 hour a day. The neuropsychologist Daniel Rama points our that an agreement must be reached between the parents and their child to see the time they spend in front of the computer.

Reply to counter argument (Against)

laurindragneel17 — 2022-08-24 00:35:11 UTC

Adolescents are considered to be people between 15 and 17 years old, so these are still minors.
Currently, due to easy access to the internet, it is more difficult for parents to monitor what their children are playing, especially when they are teenagers since many seek to give them their space. Therefore, the behavior of adolescents regarding what and how much they play can be difficult to monitor.

Conclusion

laurindragneel17 — 2022-08-24 00:42:07 UTC

In conclusion, the use of (violent) video games is not suitable entertainment for teenagers, as this can cause addiction, poor lifestyle habits and inappropriate behavior, in addition to the fact that the content of this type of video game is not suitable for all audiences.
We believe that there are other forms of entertainment that are healthier than sitting in front of a screen.

Conclusion (Pro)

rogalvezgarcia — 2022-08-25 00:10:33 UTC

After a long investigation regarding the aforementioned topic, there is currently no correlation that flagrantly dictates how "violent" video games are influential in the negative attitudes of young people. Surprisingly, thousands and thousands of reports in this regard result in unfounded assumptions or no investigation that shows a cause and effect of these. A clear example of these prejudices occurred in the 2000s, Spain. Nicknamed the “Katana Crime”, when a 16 year old boy, a fan of the “Final Fantasy” video game, murdered his parents and sister using a katana, which is used by one of the characters in said game. Automatically, the media began assumptions regarding the subject, assuring that everything was due to an alleged obsession with said character. Finally, the investigations concluded that the parricide suffered from epileptic psychosis.

To conclude, we firmly believe that video games have been a great contribution to our society, being a source of support, entertainment, calm and leisure. And not representing a danger to us. That said, we strongly support the ideal of teen entertainment through violent video games.

Reply to counter argument (pro)

dhealthysnacks — 2022-08-25 21:14:42 UTC

As the previous argument mentions it, it is said that homework is something harmful for students when there is an excess of it, being able to trigger certain problems in them, but there are also other studies that help us to demonstrate that the The problem is not the tasks, but the fact that there are too many of them.
Well, researchers at Duke University have reviewed more than 60 research studies on homework between 1987 and 2003, reaching the conclusion that they have a positive effect on the academic performance of students, although, in any case, we could highlight some other characteristics, such as the improvement of reading comprehension, since, when students carry out these activities in which they should mostly read, they incorporate greater fluency and can thus end up better understanding what they read, in addition to being a gateway to entry to discover part of their tastes, because at some point, they will find an area in which they like to function more than in others, for example, a child who likes mathematics, will take with great pleasure the challenges that are presented to him and It will arouse a greater curiosity to learn new things from it.

https://edutory.mx/ventajas-desventajas-tareas-escolares-casa/

https://www.guioteca.com/educacion-para-ninos/tareas-para-la-casa-intenso-debate-de-especialistas-pero-son-realmente-necesarias/

Reply to counter argument (against)

2022-08-25 23:48:37 UTC

According to the counterargument of our colleagues, homework is not bad as long as it is not in exo, but what about students who have full time? According to the third, more than 70% of schools have this modality, which was established by Eduardo Frei who said "these measures especially favor children who lack pedagogical space in their homes" which takes into account the reality of a a large part of Chilean students who not only have a bad environment to study at home, but many must complete household chores at the end of the school day, tasks that often involve cleaning, cooking or taking care of to his little brothers, that is why many times not even if he wants a single task is possible to carry out, the school provides them with a space where the children can carry out their activities with tranquility and comfort, this space is not found in homes especially in the middle and lower class who have a lifestyle like the one already mentioned.

Conclusion (pro)

dhealthysnacks — 2022-08-26 00:32:39 UTC

To conclude, we want to continue affirming our position that sending homework generates multiple benefits for students, although not invalidating the fact that an excess of these can also cause various problems for those who do them, but, well, that's why The ideal is to try to generate a balance between sending an appropriate amount and being able to see how they respond efficiently in their academic performance, since they will also produce certain positive characteristics, such as those that were already mentioned in the previous arguments. (autonomy, study habits and responsibility), also, it is worth mentioning that sometimes the activities that are destined for the class become homework because the students are the ones who do not take good advantage of the time available to carry them out.

conclucion (against)

dhealthysnacks — 2022-08-26 02:03:13 UTC

To conclude, homework is an alternative that falls short considering the quality of life of Chilean students, in addition to being the country with the highest prevalence of attention deficit.
This is why it is not feasible to implement a system like this one that harms the psychological stability of students, which then decreases their abilities within class hours. A more viable alternative is to be able to organize the schedules within class time so that the activities can be carried out in class, a method used by many teachers and that helps students have greater concentration and can help the teacher to solve their doubts. appropriately encouraging learning.

INTRODUCTION (PRO) (JASON Y DIEGO)

diegovm_2608 — 2022-08-26 02:28:18 UTC

To have better oportunities, colleges provides you a lot of tools to get your objectives and goals.

And it is written on the stadistics, numbers explains it. A person who doesn't have studies, wins on average 200.000 less than others that have a professional diploma. And to run your own business, it is neccessary to have capital to get start. It is different to not having studies, than leave your studies from Harvard. And it´s a good argument that some of important men and women don´t have high education, but it is different that you left Harvard, than not having any kind of studies.

INTRODUCTION (AGAINST) (SEBA Y ESTEBAN)

diegovm_2608 — 2022-08-26 02:30:15 UTC

It is sad that we talk of university as a neccesary aspect in our life, and it is probably, because of the system we are in. But, if there are people that have could go on adversity, and have could win the battle agains it, and have financial success even without having a diploma, so, the college is not as neccesary as the society thinks.

And, why some people without high education wins even more than some professionals? There are a lot of persons who have amounts of money that we can't imagine.

ARGUMENT 1 PRO

diegovm_2608 — 2022-08-26 02:31:03 UTC

To have better oportunities, colleges provides you a lot of tools to get your objectives and goals.

ARGUMENT 2 PRO

diegovm_2608 — 2022-08-26 02:35:03 UTC

According to the ETAC university, the university apart from providing you with knowledge, also improves social and communication skills, allows access to different job opportunities and
contributes to emotional maturity. Things that are crucial to have financial success, without these habilities, there´s nothing to do.

ARGUMENT 1 AGAINST

diegovm_2608 — 2022-08-26 02:35:51 UTC

the case we'll show you'all proves what we are defending, we are gonna mention some millionaries that did not finish their high education, some of them never started, and other ones left it befor

Steve Jobs: he only studied 6 months. He built an technological empire.

Milton Hershey: did not even finish the school, and now, his brand of chocolate is one of the most known brand worldwide.

Mark Zuckerberg: Probably the most known case, he was in harvard, but he left, he's owner and CEO of the biggest company of social medias.

Johnny Depp and Di Caprio wasn't never in a college, and Tom Hanks left it too.

ARGUMENT 2 AGAINST

diegovm_2608 — 2022-08-26 02:40:21 UTC

We agree that being a professional grants more capital, but then, carpenters, plumbers, and electricians, among others, would not be successful people, as the "choose your vocation" page puts it, so why do large companies also hire electricians, and trade people only for specific tasks? many times their works are more exclusive. They need each other, every knowledge is usefull

REPLY TO CONTRAARGUMENT PRO

diegovm_2608 — 2022-08-26 02:51:31 UTC

It is clear, these guys come from below, but Elon Musk never lacked for anything, on the contrary, he comes from a fairly well-to-do family, the situation changes when the conditions do not go well, and people without studies are always more affected, unemployment always attacks the labor sector more strongly , to the office than professionals ones.

CONCLUSION PRO

diegovm_2608 — 2022-08-26 02:57:01 UTC

It is true that not everything is awarded by the university, but the fundamental tools to be successful, economic knowledge, how the system works, everything. And the university degree many times weighs more than what one has learned through experience, even we apply it, without knowing that we do it. Thank you very much

CONCLUSION AGAINST SOMETHING

diegovm_2608 — 2022-08-26 02:57:34 UTC

Concluding, We hope that it is good explained, it is important we understand that it does not matter if we do not have studies or not, some incredible guys have could get ahead, even not having money, not having their family's support, and even on these conditions, they could beeing known as millionaries. The university does not teach you everything you need to be successfull on life. The desire to want to have a good way to live your life is more important than a degree.

Reply to counter argument(Against)

sepulvedas560 — 2022-08-26 03:17:01 UTC

Although, on average, a graduate student earns more money than another person who does not, currently in Chile, as a result of the enormous cost that higher education requires, the majority of students go to the CAE in search of help to cover the cost. , however, 76% of the debtors who are unable to pay it, claim to make the decision not to continue with their studies, losing time and money in the progress, those who do have a solid base of money are the most favorable to the time to conduct the study

Conclusion

2022-08-26 20:50:59 UTC

In conclusion, we can affirm that artificial intelligence is a good method of helping humanity and will not be a complete danger if it is perfected.

conclusion

2022-08-26 21:11:15 UTC

In conclusion, taking into account our arguments and counter-arguments, we affirm again that artificial intelligence is dangerous in the aspects that we raise.

yazmin_cornejo — 2022-08-31 05:20:05 UTC

Argumentos: postura en contra: Yazmin Cornejo
According to definitions of "oxford languages" leisure time is free time or rest from usual
occupations. Therefore, in that time one can do what he pleases, as some like to party, take
drugs, go out to play sports or do nothing, there are also those who decide to use their free
time with technology, video games, watch series or movies, enter forums, etc. On the other
hand, not all teenagers spend with technology, in fact those who spend with technology are
not always in it, since there comes a point where it gets boring. Technology and the internet
also allow you to broaden your horizons, since in this there is everything including books,
documentaries, news, etc. and adolescents can become more interested in this type of thing
thanks to this.

Does technology affect the leisure time of adolescents?

yazmin_cornejo — 2022-08-31 05:20:05 UTC

Argumentos: postura a favor: Nicolas Molina.
Presentation: Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, great creators in the world of technology, but
never consumers of it, today I come to show my position in favor of why technology is
destroying and affecting intelligence in the leisure time of a being human. Argument 1: since
the creation of technology, new parents have been able to "facilitate" the maintenance of
their children, thus getting them used to technology in record time, adults are not spared
either, since the appearance of technology and the dependency that this has generated, adults
not only use technology for work reasons, but also for leisure reasons in their free time.

yazmin_cornejo — 2022-08-31 05:20:52 UTC

Contra argumento 1: postura a favor: Nicolas Molina.
The debate consists of how technology affects the leisure time of adolescents, my position is in
favor of technology negatively affecting the leisure of adolescents because respect for
production and machine work has been lost as newspapers physical books and even libraries.

yazmin_cornejo — 2022-08-31 05:22:29 UTC

Contra argumento 2: postura en contra: Yazmin Cornejo.
Such creators do not spend all their leisure time at work. According to the
page "El tiempo" and citing Elon Musk "weekends are dedicated to his children (...) and his
hobbies (...) he likes to read, go to the gym, play sports, WATCH MOVIES , attend events and
spend time with her mother". Here we can confirm that if you use technology in your leisure
time and that you are not 100% dedicated to your work.

yazmin_cornejo — 2022-08-31 05:24:15 UTC

Contra argumento 2: postura a favor:
Thanks to the development of communication applications, we can realize that creators do not
use consumer technology in their leisure time because in their leisure time they also organize
updates and developments of both pages and technology companies.

yazmin_cornejo — 2022-08-31 05:43:37 UTC

Contra argumento 2: postura en contra: Yazmin Cornejo.
It is proven according to a survey carried out by the page www.julianmarquina.es that "63% of
young people prefer printed books over electronic ones" quoted directly from the page, on the
other hand there are also various communities of young people who prefer their printed
books/comics, as is the otaku community.

Such creators do not spend all their leisure time at work. According to the
page "El tiempo" and citing Elon Musk "weekends are dedicated to his children (...) and his
hobbies (...) he likes to read, go to the gym, play sports, WATCH MOVIES , attend events and
spend time with her mother". Here we can confirm that if you use technology in your leisure
time and that you are not 100% dedicated to your work.

yazmin_cornejo — 2022-08-31 05:48:29 UTC

Conclusión postura a favor: Nicolas Molina.
technology has not been used properly in leisure time, it oscillates thinking and clouds the
imagination for future projects and life in general, it has been highly overvalued in these times
and has produced many problems in aesthetics and way of thinking of the human being, at the

rate at which we continue, if we do not stop the inappropriate use of technology, the world
could become a life routine within a device, it would generate a destruction of massive
intelligence for the simple fact of knowing that 1 of every 8 people take advantage of
technology in an adequate way, but that is not in all countries, the experience is based on
what is lived, not what is consumed in a system.

yazmin_cornejo — 2022-08-31 05:50:08 UTC

Conclusión postura en contra: Yazmin Cornejo.

To conclude this debate, I can say that more advantages than disadvantages arise from technology, that technology is only part of our evolution as humans, that we will live and die with it or thanks to it. With this reflection I say goodbye, thank you very much for reading this debate.

Introducción

2022-09-01 14:04:58 UTC

We have all heard that university is essential and that without it it is difficult for us to get a quality and stable job, but according to the website sdels.com, the greatest millionaires on the planet did not finish their university studies, we have the case of steve jobs, bill gates, michael dell, walt disney

As we can also rely on the information provided by www.universia.net, a total of 118,365 people who graduated from high school entered university, which translates into a rate of 47% of the students, a figure that increases since each time they are more people who are looking for money instead of having a higher education, apart from emol.com in Chile a career the minimum is 925 thousand pesos in a university so they are figures that do not support the Chilean pocket

Counter argument

2022-09-01 14:05:40 UTC

counter argument

That prayer of a better job for studying at the university is a myth because, according to fen.udechile, 53.7% of people in Chile are employed, which is a very high margin, considering that in Chile one does not study for a job, one studies to get one. diploma and that gives you a higher employment rate which we rule out

2022-09-01 14:06:09 UTC

*response to counter argument*

Why waste time, time is money

And the time that one would be studying can be obtained by saving the money and capital that one needs for the personal objectives of each one.

(Source www.lifeboxset benefits of not going to college)

2022-09-01 14:06:29 UTC

This dilemma will always be there and everything will depend on the personal objectives of each person, for many training is essential and for others it is the money that moves the world, just do what you find perfect for your life and guide yourself under your conditions

2022-09-01 14:07:07 UTC

A favor

1. According to the CDM University (Mexico City), by attending university you will have more chances of finding a better job. A person with a bachelor's degree earns twice as much as someone with only a high school (source: 2019 National Occupation and Employment Survey)

two.

* Have more self-confidence

* Improve your self-esteem or the concept you have of yourself

* It will help you better value yourself and others

* It will help you make better decisions

* Resolve conflicts

* You will know how to manage emotions better

* You will learn to manage time better, remember time is not gold, "time is life"

* It will help you expand your knowledge

* It will open you up to change to new ideas, it will encourage your creativity and your desire to undertake

* It will allow you to learn more about your socio-cultural and historical environment

* It will give you greater tools and strengths to work as a team.