<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Tensions at the Mexican and US border by Julie</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/julie_legeay85/rnz2aqe7puio</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-03-19 08:44:31 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-03-26 00:46:32 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>julie_legeay85</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/julie_legeay85/rnz2aqe7puio/wish/243363369</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/274026345/9a467c779c6b9eaf5677397e22815121/image.png" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-19 08:50:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/julie_legeay85/rnz2aqe7puio/wish/243363369</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>I - State of play</title>
         <author>julie_legeay85</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/julie_legeay85/rnz2aqe7puio/wish/252028498</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The progressive acquisition of territory by the USA leads to a best control of maritim flows and the construction of the mexican border in 1849. </div><div>Generally, we can observe a cultural fracture (protestant and anglo-saxon in the North ; catholicism in the South) with a marked linguistic division, but also a s<strong>ocio economic fracture </strong>: the north is developed and the south is splitted up and contrasted. </div><div>America has always been a place of immigration : with the American Dream and his soft power, it attracted many people (Ellis Island). Today, the USA are the 1st migratory space of the world, with 80 % of migrants coming from the LDC’s of Latin America (ethnic diversity  + democratic gains + human capital (gateway). </div><div>But the American express a strong patriotism and sometimes the reject of foreigners. Regarding latin american countries, they express an anti-americanism feeling, with an opposition to the liberal economy</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-04-16 07:59:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/julie_legeay85/rnz2aqe7puio/wish/252028498</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2 - Problems</title>
         <author>adele_bourene</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/julie_legeay85/rnz2aqe7puio/wish/254483218</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The US invest freely in mexico (Alena) but restrict the access of mexicans in their territory. Indeed there is a paradoxical image of the USA who wants workers ready to work for cheap labour, however they don’t want strangers or illegals immigrants. So there is still a reject. </div><div>Moreover, the illgal migrants are not the only illegals flows : at the border, we can observe traffics of drugs and weapons (war on drugs) and the durability of the grey economy. </div><div><br></div><div>exchanges and level of development asymmetric</div><div>Economically, there is a negative trade balance : because of NAFTA, USA didn’t stayed 1st in the market of exportation (after China), but she still is the main actor in exchanges while his partners are dependable. </div><div>But those exchanges generate obviously an increase of the importance of the border : indeed the manufacturing employment decrease in USA, in favor of delocalisation to Mexico (maquiladores), so it generate unemployment. But also the creation of twin cities (accumulation of population on the Mexican side) which generates socials inequalities of development and a strong settlement contrast due to migration.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-04-23 16:21:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/julie_legeay85/rnz2aqe7puio/wish/254483218</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3 - Solutions or not solutions</title>
         <author>adele_bourene</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/julie_legeay85/rnz2aqe7puio/wish/254484109</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To solve those differents fractures, states instaured global organizations such as the </div><div> - NAFTA (1994) : <strong>called into questions nowadays</strong> by trump wanted to renegotiate the agreement to put first his America first policy. Goal : the equal dvlpmt of trade between Canada USA and Mexico space, which became a market with 470 millions of inhabitants, which is the 1st powerful USA = pillar of this agreement  (75% canadian exports + 78% mexican exports) → mexico and canada benefit of this growth <strong>BUT a strong and disempowering dependence persists.</strong></div><div>- Mexico also joined the Mercosur (=UNASUR), so he’s less dependant/ counteract to the US domination.</div><div><br></div><ul><li><strong>CACM (central american common market)</strong> <strong>generates a fragile integration with the US and poor results, it remain dominated by usa (tourism, exploitation, raw materials, the fact that the migrants are still sending capital to their origin countries) </strong>mexamérique, main street america </li></ul><div>So we observe that they are trying to resolve the problems of economics, culturals, demographics fractures by integrated countries under organizations. But either they don’t work, whether strongs dependances still exists.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-04-23 16:23:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/julie_legeay85/rnz2aqe7puio/wish/254484109</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
