2. Main part:

   • describe and analyze cartoons, charts, graphs etc. for giving evidence to the challenge

     
     

3. Conclusion:

   • Present solutions or projects to solve the challenges and evaluate their potential (state your own opinion)

   • final statement/ outlook

Brainstorming and doing research

Step 2:

Organizing/ Scaffolding of information and designing of a writing plan

Step 3:

Writing the article/ Proofreading

Step 4:

Presenting your articles

In a cartoon, a human man is reaching up and seems to drown under a pile of electronics or “electros” like old TVs, computers, microwaves and kitchen devices. The background is mostly white and grey, and the electronic stuff is in black and white.

The pile of devices shows our need to always upgrade and throw away electronics – it’s a sign of consume culture. These devices are often not reused or given away.

The man simbolizes the person who is overwhelmed by all this overconsumption.

The picture shows how fast our habits can become dangerous.

The arm that reaches up looks desperate, like he’s asking for help or warning us what happens if we don’t stop.

The image wants to critisize consumption and is a visual metaphor for the dangers of overconsumption.

It makes people think about their own behaviour.

The consequences of this throwaway culture are very serious.

To solve the problems, we need both serius actions.

People can start by buying only what they really need, reusing things and choosing eco-friendly products.

Schools and communities can organize workshops or campaigns to show how our habits affect the planet.

Governments should support sustainable businesses and make laws that reduce waste and pollution.

A good example is the project “Handyaktion” in Germany, which means “Phone Action”. It collects old phones and recycles them.Many people have old phones at home, but they don’t use them. Inside the phones are valuable materials like gold and silver.By recycling them, we save ressources and don’t need to do so much harmful mining.This project also tells people about the problems with smartphone production.

In my opinion, the most important thing is to change our mindset.We need to understand that buying more is not always better.If we all try to live more consious, we can help the environment and make a better world for everyone.

In the future, overconsumption must be taken more serious if we want to stop climate change and protect our ressources.

There is still time to change – but only if we act now.

As the world grapples with the escalating climate crisis, the search for reliable, low-carbon energy sources has never been more urgent. Among the most controversial candidates is nuclear power—a technology capable of producing vast amounts of electricity without emitting greenhouse gases. Proponents hail it as a climate savior, pointing to its efficiency and potential to replace fossil fuels. Critics, however, warn of catastrophic risks, radioactive waste, and the high costs of plant construction and maintenance.

This article dives into the polarizing debate surrounding nuclear energy. Is it the lifeline our warming planet needs, or a dangerous distraction from truly sustainable solutions? A thought-provoking caricature included here captures the tension between these opposing views, highlighting the hopes and fears that continue to shape the nuclear energy conversation.

Main Part

A. Advantages of Nuclear Energy

One of the biggest advantages of nuclear power is that it produces almost no CO₂ emissions during electricity generation. This makes it very attractive when it comes to fighting climate change, since CO₂ is the main driver of global warming. Compared to coal or gas power plants, nuclear energy keeps the air much cleaner and doesn’t contribute to the greenhouse effect.

Another important point is the high energy output. A small amount of uranium can produce large amounts of electricity. This means that nuclear plants don’t need as many resources as fossil fuel plants to provide the same amount of energy.

Unlike renewable sources like solar or wind, nuclear power plants are not dependent on weather conditions. The sun doesn’t always shine, and the wind doesn’t always blow—but nuclear plants can generate electricity 24/7, providing a stable and reliable energy supply.

Finally, nuclear energy is already being used successfully in several countries. France, for example, gets around 70% of its electricity from nuclear power. This shows that it is possible to rely heavily on nuclear energy for national electricity needs.

B. Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy

However, nuclear energy is not without serious problems. The biggest issue is the production of nuclear waste, which remains radioactive and dangerous for thousands of years. Safely storing this waste is a huge challenge, and future generations will still have to deal with it.

There is also the risk of accidents, even though they are rare. The disasters in Chernobyl (1986) and Fukushima (2011) showed how dangerous nuclear power can be if something goes wrong. Such accidents can harm people, animals, and the environment for decades.

Another problem is that building new nuclear plants is very expensive and takes a long time. While we need solutions for climate change quickly, nuclear plants often take 10 to 15 years to build, and they cost billions of euros or dollars.

Lastly, uranium is a limited resource. Even though it’s more energy-dense than fossil fuels, it’s not renewable. This means that, at some point, we will run out of uranium unless we develop new technologies like nuclear fusion or breeder reactors, which are still in development.

C. Cartoon Analysis: Changing Views on Nuclear Power

The cartoon shows two very different images of nuclear energy. On the left side, we see the “old image” of nuclear power. It shows a huge atomic explosion (a mushroom cloud), which symbolizes danger, destruction, and war. The man is holding a sign that says “Dangerous and unstable,” reflecting the negative view many people had—and still have—about nuclear technology, especially because of nuclear disasters and the link to nuclear weapons.

On the right side, the cartoon shows the “new image” of nuclear power. Instead of an explosion, we now see a big, healthy tree, butterflies flying around, and a peaceful scene. The man is smiling and holding a new sign that says “Not too bad, all things considered.” This suggests that today, some people see nuclear energy as a cleaner, safer, and more positive energy source, especially when compared to fossil fuels like coal or oil.

The cartoon makes a clear point: opinions about nuclear power are changing. While it used to be seen mainly as dangerous, many now believe it could help fight climate change by providing low-carbon energy.

However, the cartoon also shows that this is still a debate—nuclear power is not seen as perfect, just “not too bad” when considering the alternatives.

Overall message: Our view of nuclear power has become more positive, but concerns and doubts remain.

Conclusion

Nuclear power is a controversial topic in the fight against climate change. On the one hand, it produces low CO₂ emissions and provides a stable energy supply. On the other hand, the risks of nuclear waste, accidents, and high costs cannot be ignored.

The cartoon clearly shows this change in perspective: while nuclear power used to be seen as dangerous, today more people view it as a possible solution to global warming. But as the sign in the cartoon says, it’s still “not too bad, all things considered”—not perfect, but perhaps necessary in the short term.

In the end, the best path might be to combine different energy sources: using renewable energy like wind and solar as much as possible, and perhaps using nuclear energy as a temporary backup until cleaner solutions are fully available.

One thing is clear: The future of energy must be clean, safe, and sustainable—for the planet and for future generations.

How would you feel if your dog would be the only animal left in the world?

Now this may sound a bit extreme but nowadays animals get fewer and fewer. Sadly many people choose to ignore it because it is out of their every day view. They don't care about the African forest elephant or the Amur leopard, which are fairly close to extinction, just because it doesn't bother them in their every day life. But if we don't look out for our nature and its inhabitants soon the animals that go extinct won't be that exotic anymore but might be our everyday animals instead. And animals, that are fewer populated, through other animals, may overpopulate and swarm, when their predatory counterparts go extinct, which can lead to an ecological imbalance.

In the cartoon which was created by the caricatuourist Adam Zyglis and is called "THE BUFFOLO NEWS" we can see a grey green fish with a paper in his fin's on the left side. His eyes looks scared and tired and his mouth schocked. On the paper he Reads is a headline says:" Aquatic Times". Additionally over the fish is a caption:" As an invasive species with an endless appetite, they can decimate ecosystems and send species extinct." He also says the word

"Humans ." On the right side is a small grey green fish looking sad and dissapointed. His fins hang just around in the water. Over the small one is a caption too: " Asian Carp??." Especially the grey blued fishes lost Air bubbles, because the mouth is opened. On the ground you can see the lake bed with sea plants and a brown glass bottle which is to the half in the poisend looking lake bed. Under the small of the two fishes is like a Black Barrel sinking on the ground losing a green Substance which is spreading in the water.

The polluted environment of the fish represents the consequences species have to deal with due to human actions. Furthermore the fish, who are having a conversation, are talking about humans badly by using negative synonyms. This puts human and their behaviour in an unflattering light. The reaction of the fish emphasizes the cruelty of humans.

The cause of the polluted environment, which is shown in this cartoon, is the heavily production of non-disposable materials like plastic. In this cartoon invasive species gets mentioned, which is another origin, because stronger species can easily exploit weaker species. That's why animal extinction caused by humans gets worse.

But what can we do to prevent the previously mentioned problems and consequences?

While we are thinking about we can do agaist it, there are already people, who are already actively doing something against animal extinction.

These people are trying to protect areas, in which engaged species live and breathe, including designating critical habitats and implementing wildlife-friendly land management practices like national parks and forest, so the nature should not get destroyed and the animals can live their life without danger in a suitable environment.

An other point is climate change. We should stop using plastic to prevent pollution in the sea, so animals don't live in a harmful environment, because of human actions. We should also reduce using carbon dioxide, so the environment is not overloaded or harmed and the Greenhouse gas emissions are stopped or at least slowed down to protect animal habitats & species, affected by climate change. We should reduce the consum of meat of animals like cows, especially in countries like the US. Because of high request, cows get more bred, which leads to a higher production of carbon dioxide. Due to that animals like polar bears are in danger, because their habitat gets destroyed by the warm weather. This also leads to loss of tourism for the economy. The request of meat products is caused by rich people, who purchase meat more than the average consumer.

Animal extinction shows us that humans are the poisen for the World and that we the invasive species with an endless appetite have to do something right again. So that we think ethically again and not like a invasive species.

Animal extinction Shows us that humans are the poisen for the World and that we the invasive species with an endless appetite have to Do something right again. So that we think ethically again and not like a invasive species.

Have you ever imagined a world where bees, elephants or birds no longer exist?

Sadly, this could become reality much sooner than you might think. Every year, thousands of animal species disappear from our planet due to human activities, climate change and environmental destruction.

Animal extinction is not just a loss of biodiversity. It threatens entire ecosystems and the balance of life on Earth. In this text, we will explore the causes of extinction, its impact on the planet and what we can do to stop it.

The cartoon, drawn by Jasjyot Singh Hans, shows two books titled The Big Book of Fantasy Creatures. Both books show two animals on their covers but the types of creatures are very different.

The first book, labeled 2000, shows a unicorn and a dragon. In the top right corner, it says “Featuring: Unicorns, Dragons & many more…”

The second book, labeled 2030, shows a lion and a vulture. The top right corner reads “Featuring: Lions, Vultures, Gharials & many more…”

Between the lion and the vulture, there is a question mark, symbolizing confusion, why are real animals now shown in a book about fantasy?

The cartoon makes us reflect on this serious issue and raises awareness that many animals may soon exist only in our imagination.

A chart from October 2022 shows how many species are currently threatened with extinction. It reveals that 44% of reef corals, 41% of amphibians, 37% of sharks and rays and many other species are at risk.

This is a troubling reminder that we, as humans, are playing a major role in this crisis.

As our sources prove, animal extinction isn’t a fairy tale. It is our reality.

To prevent a future where our children ask what polar bears, lions or bees were, we must act now.

One key solution is expanding protected natural habitats so endangered animals have safe places to live and reproduce.

Organizations like WWF and local conservation groups work on habitat restoration, anti-poaching strategies and breeding programs for critically endangered species.

Technology like GPS tracking and drone monitoring helps protect animals and stop illegal hunting.

Public education can also make a difference by raising awareness and reducing harmful actions like deforestation and pollution.

In my opinion, even though these solutions are hopeful their success depends on global cooperation and lasting effort. Without real commitment, they might not be enough.

But with more awareness and action we do have a real chance to change direction and protect nature for future generations.

The Earth‘s lungs are suffocating under the Heat of global warming. That’s what seagrass are often called, because they can transform 150 million tons carbon dioxide into oxygen per year. Seagrass are plant‘s that look like grass but in gigantic, they can grow till two meters. They offer many species habitat, pray and hideout. The plants form an ecosystem that can live for several hundred years. But the existence of these important oxygen suppliers is in danger because of many factors. The question is what’s the impact of the destruction of these important plants for the global warming?

In the last few decades the population of seagrass went down by 30%. In the early 1910s Denmark produced a high sum of seagrass, which nowadays can’t be reached. Since the 1980s the worldwide spread of seagrass reduced by one to seven percent. Especially between 1970 and 2000 the loss was massive. Every second breath we take includes oxygen of the ocean and seagrass are an integral part. They absorb 15% of global carbondioxide and have a 30 to 50 times higher and 35-times faster CO2 reduction than forests. One hectare of seagrass saves the same amount of 10 hectares of forest. The absorbent carbon dioxide can be saved for several thousand years. In Europe 1869 to 2016 about 36.000 hectares were destroyed by human hands. That’s caused by many reasons, for example overfertilization, pollutant inputs, fishing industry, boat traffic, tourism and global warming. Over fertilization and pollutant inputs is created through excessive nutrient supply through agriculture because it leads to algae blooms which blocks the sunlight from reaching the seagrass. The fishing industry and boat traffic can destroy the seagrass meadows with anchors and trawls. Tourism can also be a cause for the destruction of seagrass meadows do to construction projects and improper behavior of vacationers.

Another reason are the effects of climate change such as rising temperatures or extreme weather like heat waves and storms. Additionally, the increased carbon dioxide-concentration has a negative impact.

The cartoon „ Seagrass meadow and how important they are for the climate“ was created by Chat GPT. It comments on seagrass meadows as bigtime carbon sinks. You can see the ocean and a seagrass meadow on the ground that says „we store carbon“. On the left side is a fish and  on the right corner a red starfish. On the right side right above the water is a big grey and angry looking cloud that releases its pollutants into the ocean. It has a speech bubble on it that states „climate change“. In the background is the sky with normal clouds. In the right-hand corner under the climate change cloud is just a little bit of seagrass. That symbolises the loss of it under the conditions of climate change. The little air bubbles next to the fish show the second function of seagrass: the production of oxygen, which is super essential. And the fish and the starfish are symbolic for all the animals whos habitat is in the meadows.

The cartoon doesn`t achieves its aim of presenting the huge importance of seagrass meadows because if you`re not informed about it the cartoon its difficult to understand.

Seagrass meadows can transform million tons of carbon dioxide into oxygen per year and absorb global carbon dioxide, doing so they are more efficiently and faster than forests and this carbon can be kept for many years. However, seagrass populations have shrunken over recent decades. Seegras meadows ave many threats like overfertilization, pollution, fishing practices, boat traffic, tourism and the effects of climate change. In Europe alone, many hectares were destroyed due to human activity.

The destruction of seagrass meadows reinforces the global warming. Their loss means more carbon dioxide is absorbed from the atmosphere, worsening climate change. Without seagrass, we lose an important natural source for stabilizing the climate and reducing the effects of global warming.

Plastic pollution is one of the biggest environmental problems in the world today. A cartoon by Underdone Comics clearly shows how serious this problem is. In the image, we see two clownfish underwater. One of them is hiding inside a sea anemone which is covered almost completely by plastic and trash, and the other fish asks, “Can I have a turn?” This shows how plastic waste has replaced natural homes in the ocean.

The background is full of plastic bottles, bags, forks, and even face masks. The ocean is no longer clean ,it’s full of trash. This cartoon makes a strong point: marine animals now live in a world where plastic is everywhere. It shows how plastic pollution is not only ugly, but also dangerous for animals. Fish, turtles, and many other sea creatures eat or get trapped in plastic.

This cartoon helps us understand that plastic is replacing nature. It is a powerful image that makes people think and feel sad about what is happening under the sea.

This visual is just one example, but it supports what many charts and reports say, Millions of tons of plastic enter the oceans each year. Plastic breaks into microplastics and ends up in the food chain ,even in humans.

The cartoon gives clear evidence that plastic pollution is a very big problem. It harms animals, destroys nature, and also affects us.

Not only cartoons, but also charts show that plastic pollution is a huge environmental problem. A chart from Statista shows how plastic waste has increased over time. It shows the amount of plastic waste produced globally from 1980 until today, separated by types of use.

The blue part of the chart shows packaging – like plastic bags, bottles, and food wrappers. This category is the biggest, reaching about 156 million tonnes in 2024. That means almost half of all plastic waste is just for packaging, and most of it is used only once before being thrown away.

Other categories include consumer products, vehicles, textiles, and construction. Together, they add up to hundreds of millions of tonnes of waste each year. The chart clearly shows that plastic waste is growing fast and won’t stop unless something changes.

This data proves the point shown in the cartoon: plastic is everywhere. It is not just a problem in the ocean, but a global crisis caused by how much plastic we use and throw away. The chart gives strong evidence that plastic pollution is one of the biggest environmental challenges today.

Plastic pollution is a serious global problem that affects animals, nature, and even humans. The cartoon shows  that the amount of trash in the world keep rising each year and how sea life is forced to live in plastic waste. Its clear from Both sources that we are using too much plastic, especially for packaging and one timeuse items, and we are not managing the waste properly. These items are used only once but can destroy the environment for a long time. To solve this problem, we need to take action. Industries should ban or limit onetime use plastic.  In our opinion, all of these ideas are useful, but they only work if we combine them. Cleaning up the ocean is good. Companies must find better packaging solutions. And we, should reduce our plastic use, recycle more, and choose eco friendly alternatives for our new Generation . Education and awareness are also very importent.

In our opinion, if we work together, we can still stop this problem from getting worse. But we must act now ,before our oceans turn completely into plastic dumps. The future of the planet depends on how we respond to this crisis today. The cartoon is a warning but also calls to action.

This is a famous quote from Albert Einstein describing the destructiveness of a possible third World War. He refers to the terrible power of nuclear weapons and that the civilization might collapse through that. This theoretical global conflict, involving superpowers could cause massive loss of life, environmental destruction and a collapse of society and infrastructure. Therefore the question

“What the possibilities of a world war III are and what would its consequences be?” arises.

Einstein made this statement in the aftermath of World War II, during the early years of the Cold War. The world had just witnessed the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed hundreds of thousands of people and demonstrated the catastrophic power of nuclear weapons. Einstein, horrified by the consequences, feared that another global war—World War III—would be fought with even more destructive technology, possibly wiping out civilization as we know it.

Today, Einstein’s warning feels more relevant than ever. With the rise of advanced military technologies, cyber warfare, and an increasing number of nuclear-armed states, the potential for a global conflict remains a grave concern. Political tensions between world powers like the United States, Russia, and China, combined with conflicts in regions like the Middle East and Eastern Europe, have led many to speculate about the possibility of a third world war.

However, Einstein’s quote also points toward a deeper truth: that the true danger lies not in the weapons themselves, but in the choices humanity makes. The idea that World War IV would be fought with “sticks and stones” implies a complete collapse of civilization — a regression to primitive survival after global nuclear devastation.

Einstein’s words serve as a strong reminder of the importance of diplomacy, international cooperation, and the pursuit of peace. Science and technology should be used to benefit humanity—not to threaten it. In a world where war can mean extinction, leaders and citizens alike have a moral obligation to prevent such a catastrophe. The quote also encourages reflection on the nature of progress. Technological advancement does not equate to moral advancement. Without wisdom, empathy, and restraint, our greatest innovations can become our greatest threats.

Albert Einstein may not have lived to see World War III, and hopefully, none of us ever will. His prediction was not meant as a prophecy but as a warning. If humanity does not learn from its past, it may not have a future worth preserving. It is up to current and future generations to ensure that Einstein’s vision of a post-apocalyptic world remains a hypothetical — and not our reality.

This political cartoon shows three world leaders sitting around a red button labeled “START WAR.” Each of them is angrily pointing at the others, shouting “HE STARTED IT!” In the background, the Earth is engulfed in flames, symbolizing the destruction and chaos caused by global conflict. To the right, a small child wearing a shirt that says “FUTURE” looks on in shock and asks, “WHAT HAPPENED TO REASON?”

The cartoon criticizes the way powerful nations handle international tensions—by blaming each other instead of taking responsibility or seeking peaceful solutions. The red button highlights how easily a war could be triggered, while the burning Earth emphasizes the severe consequences of such decisions. The child represents future generations who will suffer the most, even though they had no influence over the choices that led to war.

Overall, the cartoon delivers a powerful message: when world leaders act irresponsibly and let pride and blame guide their actions, the whole world is put at risk—especially the innocent. It is a call for reason, accountability, and the urgent need to prioritize peace over power.

Deforestation is one of the biggest environmental problems in the world today. Every year, large areas of forests are cut down for wood, farming, or construction. This destroys the habitats of many animals, increases climate change, and damages the planet. Although some politicians and companies say they want to protect the environment, their actions often tell a different story. The cartoon shows this problem in a very clear and ironic way.

The cartoon shows a destroyed landscape. There are tree stumps everywhere, the ground is dry and lifeless, and in the background, a forest is burning. A bulldozer stands nearby, ready to cut down more trees. Nature is almost completely gone.

In the center of the picture, there is a man in a suit, probably a politician. He is smiling proudly at the camera. Next to him is a glass dome with a small green tree and some grass inside – the only piece of nature left. A camera crew is filming him. There is also a sign showing that this little area is protected and should not be touched.

The cartoon shows, in an ironic way, how politicians or companies often pretend to care about the environment. In reality, they are destroying most of it. They protect only a tiny part of nature and proudly show it to the media to look good. But the rest of the forest continues to be cut down and burned – we can see that clearly in the background.

So, the cartoon criticizes this kind of fake environmental protection, also known as “greenwashing”. It is a warning that saving just one small part of nature is not enough. Real action is needed to stop deforestation and protect the planet.

Conclusion and Outlook:

The cartoon is a strong reminder that real environmental protection needs more than just good publicity. If we continue to destroy forests while pretending to care, the planet will suffer even more. In the future, it is important that governments, companies, and individuals take serious action to protect nature. This includes planting new trees, stopping illegal logging, and creating laws that really help the environment. Only with honest efforts and long-term thinking can we save our forests and build a better, greener future for everyone.

Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ic-J6hcSKa8&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD