<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Police organisations should operate independently  	of government and civilian oversight. by Garry Sims</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict</link>
      <description>The two teams have delivered their argument on this topic. The judges will now provide a summary and identify the winner of the debate.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-11-02 09:46:04 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-11-03 06:12:37 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157394</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>They were very informative in their that provided relevant information and understanding, although it did at times deter away from the topic which made it hard to understand at times. Overall it was a good speech that provided interesting reasons</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:33:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157394</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157476</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Strong introduction, provided substantial amount of information. However, the question wasnt answered clearly </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:34:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157476</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Yeah they were good but perhaps a little more information would be nice</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157479</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:34:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157479</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Yeah </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157562</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Yeah they were god</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:34:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157562</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157607</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Their information was well informed and they tried to keep the phrase of "the police as the community and the community as the police" as their main phrase. They have provided examples to prove their points, such as rich people being involved in politics (Malcolm Turnbull, Tony Abbott and Donald Trump). Also the case study about North Korea was an excellent example that showed what could happen if politicians were involved with police organisations. I hoped they would have provided an overall summary for their arguments.  Overall, it is a great overall of their viewpoint regarding the topic.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:34:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157607</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157660</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>strong introduction thats stated clearly what was going to happen within the debate&nbsp;<br><br>the body was delivered very well however it did drift away from the topic a little bit but overall was good and informative&nbsp;<br><br>the conclusion was good although it did drift off topic at the beginning but end really well. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:35:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157660</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>They were good they did provide alot of info however i feel they went a little astray by talking about rich wealthy politicians i dont know what they have to do with police. </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157859</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:36:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157859</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157877</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The argument presented was well presented and research. However, there was insufficient example to support the given argument.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:36:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157877</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157902</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>They were good overall, but it did lack sufficient information to back up their claims/reasons, which made it hard to understand </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:37:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157902</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157975</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>should of provided a little more information in the body for everyone to better understand the topic however the introduction and conclusion was completed nicely. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:37:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203157975</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>the judges are the winners we are the legends of the group </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158036</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>but to be serious i feel the negative team won </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:38:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158036</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158112</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Went Off topic constantly</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:38:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158112</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158255</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Both team has provided good amount of example towards their argument. But overall, the negative argument was slightly better<br>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:39:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158255</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158311</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There was great statements that was provided, however they should have provided more information regarding their topics would be great and if they could provide examples, it would create a better understanding for the judges.&nbsp;Although, there is a lack of information provided, they had provided the basics details needed in their arguments (introduction, body and summary).</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:40:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158311</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158966</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Although, this is not an actual debate as the affirmative and the negative did not discuss their opponents points and the bad points regarding the other's statements/arguments. Overall, I think that the affirmative because their information was more well-informed and they included examples that was relevant to the point. I also like how they kept on repeating their catch phrase of "the police as the community and the community as the police".&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-03 01:44:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/g_sims/verdict/wish/203158966</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
