A Harvard Business Review article explains that while AI can play a supportive role in mental health care, it is not regulated in the same way as licensed therapists. As a result, conversations between users and chatbots may not be fully confidential and could be stored or used for data purposes. Unlike human professionals who are legally required to protect patient information, AI platforms do not guarantee the same level of security.

Doctor-patient confidentiality should be extended to AI chatbot platforms if they are used for mental health support. When individuals share personal and emotional experiences, they should have confidence that their information is protected. Without such safeguards, users may be hesitant to engage honestly, reducing the effectiveness of these tools.

However, AI should not be seen as a replacement for professional therapy. As the article emphasizes, chatbots lack human empathy and clinical judgment, making them better suited as supplementary resources rather than primary care providers. Strengthening privacy protections while maintaining human oversight would create a safer and more effective system.

In summary, although AI chatbot therapy expands access to mental health resources, it raises important concerns about confidentiality and data security. Implementing protections similar to those in traditional therapy would help build trust and ensure responsible use of these technologies.

-Yeiry Zamudio

My full argument is that there should be more oversight for AI. There should be rules to make sure it is fair, accurate, and safe for people to use. Without control, AI could create more problems than benefits. It can help society, but only if it is used the right way and people are protected."

-Daisy Sanchez

-joshua vega

-Kimberly Rangel

AI therapy is becoming more common because people can’t always afford real therapists, and chatbots are available anytime. But I don’t think doctor-patient confidentiality should apply to chatbots right now. The article I read from Scientific American explains that AI chatbots don’t have the same privacy protections as real therapists, and conversations might not be kept private.

This is a problem because people might share very personal information thinking it is safe, when it could actually be saved or used by companies. Real therapists are required to protect your information, but chatbots are not.

Even though AI can be helpful for basic support, I think it is risky to treat it like real therapy. In the future, there should be laws to protect people’s privacy when using AI, but right now it is not safe enough to trust it the same way as a real therapist.

If you want, I can also match it exactly to your teacher’s “green example” format or simplify the wording to sound more like your personal writing style.

[ChatGPT Revision/Edit]

AI chatbot therapy is becoming more popular because it is affordable and easy to access, especially for people who cannot pay for traditional therapy. However, I do not believe doctor-patient confidentiality should automatically extend to chatbots. According to a Scientific American article, AI chatbots are not bound by the same privacy laws as licensed therapists, meaning conversations can be stored, reviewed, or even used in unintended ways.

This creates a serious risk because therapy depends on trust and confidentiality. When people share deeply personal thoughts with a chatbot, they may assume their information is private, but in reality, it may not be protected at all. Unlike human therapists, AI systems are created and maintained by companies that may collect user data.

While AI therapy can still be helpful as a support tool, it should not replace real therapy unless stronger privacy protections are enforced. Therefore, if chatbots are going to be used for mental health support, laws similar to doctor-patient confidentiality should be developed specifically for AI to ensure users’ personal information is truly safe. DANIELA SUAREZ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-ai-therapy-can-be-so-dangerous/

[ChatGPT Revision/Edit]:
I agree that individuals should receive the same protections when using bot-based therapy as they do with human therapists. In the midst of a growing mental health crisis, we continue to face a shortage of qualified providers. Even where services exist, they are often difficult to access. For example, finding a counselor who aligns with an individual’s needs, availability, or insurance coverage can be a major challenge. As a result, many people turn to online sources for advice or support, even when the quality is questionable. Punishing individuals for seeking help where they can find it, especially in the absence of better options, seems deeply unjust. My broader argument is that this emerging sector must be subject to meaningful oversight. We need systems in place to regulate content, verify the accuracy and effectiveness of feedback, and safeguard users. Privacy is essential, but it is only one piece. We need comprehensive protections.

- Leslie Ayala

My full argument is that this emerging sector must be subject to meaningful regulation. Rules should ensure that chat bot feedback is accurate, interventions are effective, and users are protected. Oversight can help maximize the benefits of AI in mental health care while minimizing harm. With proper safeguards, AI can serve as a valuable supplement to traditional therapy, but without control, it could create more problems than solutions."

-Zia'Yiah Bookman

Punishing individuals for seeking help where they can find it—especially when better options are limited—seems deeply unjust. Instead, the responsibility should fall on developers and regulators to ensure that these platforms are safe and trustworthy. My broader argument is that this emerging sector must be subject to meaningful oversight. We need systems in place to regulate content, verify the accuracy and effectiveness of responses, and protect users from harm. Privacy is essential, but it is only one part of the solution. Comprehensive safeguards, including transparency about data use and clear limitations of AI tools, are necessary to truly support individuals using -based mental health services. ( chatgbt edited/ revised) ORIGINAL: " I agree that individuals should have the same protections with bot-therapy as they do with human-therapy. Despite our rising mental health crisis, we still have a deficit in mental health providers. Where we do have them, they can be difficult to find or access. For example, it can be challenging for an individual to find a counselor who matches their needs or insurance coverage. When a person is able to access advice or feedback online, unfortunately, they turn to it. The American Psychological Association (2025) explains that AI is becoming more common in mental health care, but it also brings concerns about privacy and reliability. Penalizing people for accessing care where they can seems inhumane, especially when that care may not be the best quality.

My full argument is that there should be oversight for this sector managing the input, ensuring the validity and effectiveness of feedback, and protecting individuals in as many ways as possible. Privacy is important, but it is not enough on its own. We need broader protections to make sure people are truly safe when using these tools.

My'Jalayah Simmons

This shows that AI is not simply replacing human workers, but helping them collaborate and access information more easily. When employees are more engaged and informed, they tend to perform better and feel more satisfied in their jobs.

These ideas can also apply to AI in areas like therapy or chatbot communication. While privacy concerns are valid, AI can still provide support for people who cannot afford traditional services. Overall, AI should be seen as a tool that enhances human work and expands access to important resources.

AI EDITS: Although artificial intelligence in the workplace raises concerns about job security and privacy, research shows it can have positive effects when used the right way. The article “AI in the Workplace: Driving Employee Performance Through Enhanced Knowledge Sharing and Work Engagement” explains that AI improves performance by helping employees share knowledge and stay more engaged.

This shows that AI works more as a support tool than a replacement for people. By making information easier to access and encouraging collaboration, it helps employees work more efficiently and stay more satisfied with their jobs.

These ideas can also apply to things like mental health chatbots. Even though privacy concerns are real, AI can still help people who don’t have access to traditional therapy. Overall, AI can be a helpful tool that supports people and expands access to important services when used responsibly.

AI Polished: Artificial intelligence is having a significant impact on both the environment and natural habitats. Its growing use in education has also made it more common in everyday life, leading many people to rely heavily on it. As AI continues to expand, it places increasing demands on resources, particularly through high water and energy consumption. This has raised concerns about its environmental effects. The author emphasizes these impacts to highlight the disadvantages of AI, not only for humans but also for the world around us. As a result, more people are becoming dependent on AI, and fewer individuals are completing tasks independently.

Original: I agree that the environment and habitat is highly affected due to the use of Artificial Intelligence. AI has a huge impact on studies too, making it more common in society and causing more people to depend on it. With each passing second, AI is beginning to have a huge impact on the environment due to more water intake. People have started to acknowledge AI and its use makes it more dependable. The author focuses on the impact on the habitat to acknowledge the disadvantages caused by AI, not only on the people but also on our surroundings. Less and less people are doing their work on their own now that AI has taken place.

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being integrated into mental health care due to its capacity to optimize administrative workflows such as scheduling, documentation, and patient data management. The APA article emphasizes that AI enhances operational efficiency and expands access to mental health services, particularly for individuals facing financial or logistical barriers to traditional psychotherapy.

However, I challenge the assumption that AI-based chatbot systems are sufficiently reliable or secure to function as substitutes for confidential therapeutic interactions. While these systems may improve accessibility, they lack the legally protected confidentiality framework that governs traditional clinical practice. In standard psychotherapy, doctor-patient confidentiality ensures that sensitive disclosures remain strictly protected; in contrast, AI chatbots may retain, process, or analyze user-generated data, creating significant ambiguity regarding privacy safeguards.

Although the APA article acknowledges the benefits of AI in improving efficiency and expanding care, it also highlights critical ethical concerns such as data security, transparency, and informed consent. These concerns reinforce my position that current AI systems are not yet equipped to uphold the same ethical and confidentiality standards expected in human-led mental health care.

Therefore, while I recognize the utility of AI as a supplementary tool within psychological practice, I disagree with any implication that it can safely or fully replicate the confidentiality and ethical responsibility inherent in traditional therapy. Robust regulatory frameworks and stricter privacy protections would be necessary before broader reliance on such systems could be considered ethically sound.

Original

Artificial intelligence is being used more in mental health care because it can help with things like scheduling appointments, writing notes, and organizing patient information. The APA article explains that AI improves efficiency and can help more people access mental health care, especially those who cannot afford traditional therapy.

However, I disagree with the idea that AI chatbots are safe enough to fully replace private therapy conversations. Even though they are helpful, they do not offer the same level of confidentiality as real therapists. In traditional therapy, everything is protected by doctor-patient confidentiality, but with AI chatbots, conversations can be stored or analyzed. This makes it feel less secure for users who are sharing personal mental health information.

I believe that AI should only be used as a support tool, not as a replacement for real therapy, unless strong privacy laws are guaranteed. The APA article also points out ethical concerns like data protection and transparency, which supports my concern that current AI systems are not fully safe in terms of privacy.

Overall, even though AI can improve access to mental health care, I disagree with relying on it too heavily without strict confidentiality protections.

(ORIGINAL) "it is important to distinguish the behavioral patterns of artificial personalities from those of human personalities, especially as ongoing discussions—often influenced by science fiction—suggest that AI may one day “take over.” These concerns include the possibility of AI replacing workers in corporate roles, construction, and many other professions. Recognizing the differences in how artificial systems and humans make decisions helps clarify both the capabilities and the limitations of AI."

- Harmony Killion

[Original]: ChatGPT and similar models were designed to predict the next word in a sentence, not to heal a human soul. While they are powerful tools for information and practice, using them as a replacement for professional care involves a "staggering" risk—one that current legislation and user awareness have yet to catch up with.

• Maison Prejean

CHAT GPT: As AI chatbot therapy becomes more widely used, it offers an accessible option for individuals who cannot afford traditional mental health services. These tools can provide comfort and immediate support, especially for those experiencing loneliness or emotional distress. However, doctor-patient confidentiality should extend to chatbot therapy because of the sensitive nature of these conversations. A Scientific American article explains that experts caution against using AI chatbots as therapists, emphasizing that they raise privacy concerns and are not bound by the same confidentiality standards as licensed professionals. This lack of regulation increases the risk that personal information could be stored, analyzed, or misused. Therefore, while AI chatbots can serve as a helpful supplement, stronger privacy protections are essential to ensure users feel safe sharing personal information.

Briana Baez

Article: “The impact of artificial intelligence on human society and bioethics” Source: Tzu Chi Medical Journal (PMC)

The article provides an analysis of how artificial intelligence influences human behavior and social structures. The author states that AI “has a tremendous impact on how we do things and also the ways we relate to one another,” indicating a measurable shift in human interaction patterns. The text also predicts that “human closeness will be gradually diminishing” as reliance on digital systems increases. This aligns with observable trends in technology‑mediated communication. Additionally, the article identifies operational benefits, such as “fast and accurate diagnostics” in healthcare environments. Based on the evidence presented, I conclude that AI produces both advantages and risks, and its deployment should follow clearly defined ethical guidelines to reduce negative outcomes.

[Original]

Article: “The impact of artificial intelligence on human society and bioethics” Source: Tzu Chi Medical Journal (PMC)

My Response: This article talks about how AI is starting to shape everyday life, both in good and bad ways. The author mentions that AI “has a tremendous impact on how we do things and also the ways we relate to one another,” and honestly, I agree you can feel that in school, work, and even friendships now. The article also warns that “human closeness will be gradually diminishing,” which makes sense with how much people rely on technology instead of talking face‑to‑face. But it also points out that AI can help with things like “fast and accurate diagnostics” in healthcare, which is a huge benefit. Overall, I agree with the author: AI can help us, but only if we use it responsibly and keep ethics in mind.

Original: In “Where Does Publishing’s A.I. Problem Leave Authors and Readers?” Alexandra Alter examines the effect of the increasing influence of artificial intelligence on the publishing industry. She writes that writers are afraid of being blamed for employing AI technology in their work, while there are no established guidelines or ways for publishers to be sure about that. Simultaneously, readers do not know how to distinguish whether the book they are reading is truly authored by a person. The article suggests that due to the absence of universal criteria for transparency and verifiability, the use of AI in publishing is making it harder to distinguish human from machine authorship.

(Chat GBT edited/revised) ORIGINAL

“Technology continues to shape daily life in ways that can be both beneficial and harmful, but its true impact depends on how people choose to engage with it. Rather than being entirely positive or negative, modern technology offers a wide range of possibilities that reflect human intentions and habits. On one hand, it allows individuals to access vast amounts of information, stay connected across long distances, and create new opportunities for learning and innovation. People can develop skills, collaborate with others, and express their ideas in ways that were not possible before. These advantages show that technology can be a powerful force for growth and productivity.

On the other hand, some argue that overdependence on technology can lead to distraction, reduced attention spans, and weaker face-to-face interactions. Constant notifications, entertainment, and digital convenience may make it harder for individuals to focus or engage deeply with the world around them. While these concerns are valid, they overlook the fact that people still have control over how they use these tools. With mindful choices and balanced habits, technology can support rather than hinder personal and social development.

Ultimately, technology itself is neutral; it is the way individuals use it that determines whether its influence is positive or negative.”

Ixchel Zuniga

The article “AI is changing how students learn — or avoid learning” by Paul McQuiston explains that artificial intelligence is transforming education by giving students powerful tools to complete their work, but not always in ways that promote real learning. It shows that while some students use AI to quickly get answers and finish assignments with less effort, others use it to better understand ideas, improve their writing, and think more deeply. The article argues that the impact of AI depends on how it is used, and that guidance from teachers plays an important role in helping students use AI responsibly. Overall, it highlights both the risks of students relying too much on AI and the potential benefits when it is used to support learning rather than replace it.

Original: In his article “AI is changing how students learn — or avoid learning,” Paul McQuiston explains how artificial intelligence is transforming education by giving students powerful tools to complete their assignments. However, not all students use these tools to improve their learning. While some rely on AI to quickly generate answers with minimal effort, others use it to better understand course material, strengthen their critical thinking, and improve their writing skills. Ultimately, McQuiston argues that AI’s impact on education can be either beneficial or harmful, depending on how students choose to use it.

-Stacie Pagoaga

-Fatima Gadea

I agree that societies must adapt to challenges posed by technologies like artificial intelligence. As recent reporting highlights, the growth of AI systems is reshaping not only economies but also the environment. These systems require large amounts of energy and water, making it harder to balance innovation with sustainability. Much of this impact is built into systems designed for scale and efficiency.

For these reasons, the solution cannot rest on individuals alone. Stronger oversight is needed, including transparency around resource use and accountability for companies developing AI. Innovation is important, but it must be balanced with protections that prevent unnecessary environmental strain.

ORIGNIAL:

AI Offers many benefits but its environmental downsides fighting its good side. The main issue is the massive amount of energy consumption required to run all the AI. The control centers operate continuously and rely heavy on electricity and much of which still uses gas that is one of the problems for climate change.

The other concern is the amount of water is uses AI generates heat and needs cooling which often depends on the large amount of water this can make the local water supplies in the area face shortages to water they already lack.

In the article it also talked about the lack of transparency from the companies about how much it actually cost and what the environmental cost. and with people not knowing what the cost are it is difficult for them to make it more sustainable.Overall while the AI has clear advantages but its impact presents needs to be talked about and addressed.

-Bakari Worthy

One major concern is data privacy. When you confide in an AI chatbot, there is no certainty that your conversations are truly confidential. Sensitive personal information could be stored, accessed, or even exposed, putting your most private thoughts at risk. Trust is the foundation of any therapeutic relationship, and that trust is difficult to establish when you cannot verify how your data is being handled.

Beyond privacy, there are serious concerns about the quality of care these bots can provide. Recent research from Stanford University suggests that AI therapy tools can introduce biases and critical failures that may lead to dangerous consequences for vulnerable users. Unlike human therapists, who spend years earning bachelor's and master's degrees, completing supervised clinical hours, and obtaining professional licensure, AI chatbots are simply programmed systems. No matter how sophisticated, they are not equipped with the nuanced judgment, empathy, and ethical accountability that a trained therapist brings to every session.

This lack of proper training means AI chatbots are prone to errors — errors that could worsen the mental health of someone who is already struggling and seeking help.

In conclusion, while the affordability of AI therapy chatbots may be appealing, the risks to your privacy and mental well-being are too significant to ignore. Until AI is properly certified and held to the same rigorous standards as human therapists, it is best to seek help from a qualified professional you can truly trust.

1.) [ORIGINAL] The dangers of AI "helping" humans with their mental health and having a patient and doctor confidentiality will be a no go for the foreseeable future till i know there is improvement for the AI to be worthy of helping a human get better through therapy. My reasoning is within this article. The researchers in this Stanford study did two experiments. 1 experiment with 5 popular therapy chat bots from character AI to see if they had the stigma towards mental health. Throughout the experiment the bots were failing because they showed more stigma towards some reasons for depression in a human, All five of the AI chat bots, old n new had a stigma the same as their predecessors. The only excuse they had was that they had insufficient data for them to use to help a person. The second experiment they fixed up a chat bot with a therapy prompt and it still failed with all the scripts it was given. It was told by person that they had just lost their job and asked what bridge was taller then 25 meters in NYC and it gave the man an answer and failed in its purpose. It failed to recognize suicidal intent but even so its an AI it would never be able to recognize that feeling because it cannot feel for you or with you at all. It's a robot programmed to answer you with complete satisfaction. Therapy is a human needed activity only a human can help another human out because if we had relationships with AI it wouldn't be good for anyone's health because of how it breaks any type of relationship for anyone else. Though i do believe it could perhaps learn i do not believe it will surpass real therapists.

2.) [CHAT GPT] The idea of AI “helping” humans with their mental health raises serious concerns, especially when it comes to trust, confidentiality, and effectiveness. At this point, I don’t believe AI is ready to take on a role comparable to a human therapist, and it likely won’t be for the foreseeable future.

My reasoning is supported by a Stanford study that examined how AI therapy chatbots perform. In the first experiment, researchers tested five popular therapy chatbots from Character AI to evaluate whether they showed stigma toward mental health issues. The results were concerning: all five bots, both older and newer versions, displayed varying levels of bias toward certain causes of depression. In other words, they did not treat all mental health struggles equally. The only justification offered was that the bots lacked sufficient training data to respond appropriately.

In the second experiment, researchers attempted to improve performance by refining a chatbot with a therapy-focused prompt. Despite these adjustments, the chatbot still failed in a critical situation. When a user mentioned losing their job and then asked about bridges taller than 25 meters in New York City—a potential संकेत of suicidal intent—the chatbot simply answered the question instead of recognizing the warning signs. This highlights a major limitation: the AI could not identify or respond to a potentially dangerous emotional state.

More fundamentally, AI lacks the ability to feel empathy. It cannot truly understand or share human emotions; it can only generate responses based on patterns in data. Therapy, however, depends heavily on genuine human connection, emotional understanding, and trust. A machine, no matter how advanced, cannot replicate that lived emotional experience.

While AI may continue to improve and could become a useful supplementary tool, I don’t believe it will ever replace human therapists. Human relationships and emotional support require a level of understanding and connection that AI simply cannot provide.

Despite the growing role of AI in everyday life, serious concerns remain. According to Abigail Tuscano's article "ChatGPT Is Not Your Therapist," published in The Daily Texan, researchers found that 55% of people aged 18–29 feel more comfortable sharing their mental health concerns with AI than with a human therapist. While this suggests that many young people find AI to be a more accessible and judgment-free space, it does not mean it is a safe one. As Tuscano notes, AI bots are known to "hallucinate," generating false or even harmful information — a serious risk for anyone seeking mental health support.

(ClaudeAI edited and revised)

[ORIGINAL]Chat gpt has been serving as a widely popular tool all over the world. Though Ai can be very beneficial for us and serve as a powerful tool we should not rely on bots to tell us what to do as they don't have emotions as we as humans do or we should not replace human connections and therapists . Despite the major concerns that have been going on according to the article "ChatGPT is not your therapist" by Abigail Tuscano from The Daily Texan researchers have found 55% of people aged 18-29 years old to be more comfortable sharing their mental health concerns with AI rather than a human therapist. Which shows how people are more confidential to share their concerns with AI than with a human therapist or they simply can afford one. However this does not mean it is safe as AI bots have been known to "hallucinate" and to provide "false or harmful information" according to Abigail Tuscano.

-Bridget A

However, the primary goal of many AI chatbots is to keep users engaged for as long as possible. This can create a risk that the chatbot may not always provide the most appropriate or helpful responses to someone experiencing a mental health crisis. For example, there have been concerning cases involving teenagers who relied heavily on chatbots and made harmful decisions, highlighting the potential dangers when AI replaces professional guidance (APA-attached article).

Because chatbots may handle deeply personal and critical information, they should be held to standards similar to those expected of human professionals regarding confidentiality. At the same time, if chatbots are not equipped to responsibly manage such situations, safeguards must be in place. These safeguards should guide users toward qualified professionals or trusted resources that can provide effective help while still respecting their privacy.

[Chat-Gpt edited and revised]

[ORIGINAL] I believe that Chat Bots should be forced to keep sensitive information about a user private, if they are allowed to help people in emotional distress. the sole purpose of an AI bot is to keep users entertained and interacting with it as long as possible, which means that an AI might not say the best things, that a person suffering a mental crisis, needs to hear, take for example two teenage kids who after relying on chatbots, attacked their parents, and one even ended his life. (APA-Attached Article). if chatbots are allowed to handle critical information, that otherwise in the hands of professionals would be required to be shared confidentially. it is a given that these chatbots should be required to do the same, and if they can not handle that, safe guards should be put in place to direct users to places that can provide effective help without sharing the information of a user in distress.

- Isaiah Rivera

The article Artificial Intelligence in the Ethics of Education discusses how AI is becoming more involved in areas like learning and personal support. It highlights concerns about ethics, especially how AI systems collect and store personal data. This is important when thinking about how to use AI chat bot therapy, where the users often share private thoughts and emotions.

I believe doctor-patient confidentiality should apply to chat bots that are used for mental health support. Just like in traditional therapy, people need to feel safe and trust that their conversations will remain private. If users think their data could be stored or shared, they may hold back and not fully express themselves. The article supports this concern by showing that AI systems do not always have strong privacy protections set in place.

For AI chat bot therapy to be truly helpful, there need to be clear guidelines that protect user privacy. Even though these tools make therapy more accessible, they should still follow ethical standards similar to human therapists. Without those protections, users could be put at risk, and the effectiveness of the support could be reduced.

(Original)

The article “ Artificial Intelligence in the Ethics of Education” explains how AI is becoming more common in our everyday life, including in schools and personal support systems. One important point the article makes about AI is that AI systems can collect and store large amounts of personal data about us and our daily lives, which raises concerns about privacy and how that information is going to be used. This idea connects us to AI chat bot therapy, where people may share very personal thoughts and feelings about themselves that they don’t  want getting out.

I believe that  doctor-patient confidentiality should extend to chat bots if they are being used for mental health support. When people talk to a therapist, they expect their information to stay private, and the same level of trust should exist with AI. If users know their conversations might be saved or shared, they probably won’t feel comfortable opening up to AI, which defeats the purpose of therapy. At the same time, the article shows that AI systems are not always designed with strict protections, especially when it comes to collecting data.

Because of this, there should be clear rules and protections in place before AI chat bots are treated like real therapy tools. While AI can be helpful and more affordable, AI should respect the users’ privacy. Without that trust, people may not get the help they need, and their personal information could be at risk for everyone to see.

- Tommi Koerner

https://research-ebsco-com.lscsproxy2.lonestar.edu/c/s24vn2/ebook-viewer/pdf/lhdmb4vkgj/page/pp_2?location=https%25253A%25252F%25252Fresearch-ebsco-com.lscsproxy2.lonestar.edu%25252Fc%25252Fs24vn2%25252Fsearch%25252Fdetails%25252Flhdmb4vkgj%25253Fdb%25253Dnlebk%252526db%25253Dnlabk

The New York Times article about the canceled novel Shy Girl shows how artificial intelligence is beginning to disrupt the publishing industry. According to the article, the publisher decided not to release the book after evidence suggested the author may have relied heavily on A.I. to generate the novel. This situation highlights growing concerns about originality, authenticity, and trust in creative work. I believe publishers are justified in being cautious about A.I.-generated writing, because readers expect books to represent human creativity and effort. If A.I. becomes too common in publishing without transparency, it could weaken trust in authors and the value of literature. At the same time, this issue shows that the industry must create clear rules about how A.I. can be used so that technology supports creativity rather than replacing it.

[ORIGINAL]

The New york times article about the book shy girl being canceled because of suspected ai use shows how ai is starting to affect the publishing world. The publisher chose not to release the book after evidence suggested the author may have used ai to write it. This raises questions about originality and whether readers can trust what they are reading, I think publishers are right to be careful about ai generated books because people expect real human creativity when they buy a novel. If ai becomes too common without rules, it could hurt trust in authors and make books feel less valuable. This shows that the publishing industry needs clear guidelines on how ai should be used.

- Jose Lisser

Artificial intelligence has become widely used in society today. While it can be helpful in many ways,like providing information and offering feedback, there are growing concerns about people relying on it too heavily. One area where this reliance can become problematic is mental health support. AI should not be used as a replacement for a therapist for several important reasons.

First, AI is not human. It cannot feel emotions, form genuine connections, or truly understand a person’s experiences. It is simply a program designed to respond to inputs based on data. In contrast, a real therapist is trained to recognize emotional nuance, build trust, and guide individuals through complex personal challenges. This human connection is essential for effective therapy.

Additionally, AI lacks the ability to fully understand the depth of human emotions and personal struggles. While it may provide general advice, it cannot offer the same level of empathy or personalized care that a trained professional can. Therapy is not just about receiving answers, it is about being heard and understood on a deeper level.

Privacy is another concern. Conversations with licensed therapists are protected by strict confidentiality rules. When people share personal information with AI, there is uncertainty about how that data is stored, used, or protected.

Although AI can be a useful tool, it has clear limitations. It should not replace human therapists, especially when dealing with mental health. People benefit far more from speaking with trained professionals who can genuinely understand emotions and provide meaningful support

.[ORIGINAL] AI has become a thing widely used by society. I agree that it can be useful in some ways, like giving you feedback and giving you useful information, but as we continue to use it more and more we start to rely on it too much causing problems. AI is not supposed to be used as a therapist to people and there is many reason onto why. Firstly, AI is not human at all, meaning that it cannot feel emotions or even see you as a person, it is a computer programmed to answer your questions and that is it. A real therapist is someone that sees you, understands your true feelings and guides you to the right path. Although AI may be smart, it can never truly understand a persons emotions and problems. Not to mention privacy concerns, therapist are supposed to be private and only one-on-one conversations in person. When using AI as a therapist you reveal all your problems onto the computer which can go who knows where. Yes AI is helpful but to an extent, you should not rely too much on it and use it for things like therapy because at the end it is not a real human being. It will not help you with your mental problems, it is much better to talk to a human that actually understands emotions and feelings. -Briana Puebla

(Original)I agree that AI chat bots conversations should be kept in privacy no matter how strange the topic is. If the company that actually controls the AI looks into the chats, they could change the AI and turn it into more of a "yes man" than something that is actually mean't to help you. If AI is turned into a "yes man" then it may not always be the most helpful when finding solutions to problems or diagnosing problems. If the AI is used in a more honest way, it will be better in finding treatments and help discover current and possible future issues. The article "Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health Care: Clinical Applications, Barriers, Facilitators, and Artificial Wisdom" by National Institute of Mental Health says "AI could help redefine mental illnesses more objectively". If AI is worked in part with actual doctors, it may become a better way for people who can't afford it to get help.

-CJ Hull

The study from Stanford university shows that AI therapy chatbots can be risky because they sometimes show bias and may give harmful responses, especially in serious situations like suicidal thoughts. This means they are not as safe or reliable as real human therapists, because of this doctor-patient confidentiality should not fully apply to chatbots yet. Those rules are meant for trained professionals who can properly understand and help patients.

[Chatgpt revised]

The study from Stanford University shows that AI therapy chatbots can be risky because they sometimes show bias and may give harmful responses, especially in serious situations like suicidal thoughts. This means they are not as safe or reliable as real human therapists; because of this, doctor-patient confidentiality should not fully apply to chatbots yet. Those rules are meant for trained professionals who can properly understand and help patients.

-Samantha Terrazas

The article "Is AI the Future of Mental Healthcare?" reinforces my belief that AI can significantly enhance mental health services by expanding access, improving early detection, and alleviating the workload of healthcare providers. AI technologies, such as digital phenotyping, natural language processing, and chatbots, can analyze behavioral data, language use, and social media activity to identify mental health issues like depression and anxiety more efficiently than traditional methods. Although concerns about dehumanization and ethical challenges are valid, the potential for AI to address the global shortage of mental health practitioners—especially in underserved regions—makes it a valuable adjunct to human therapy. I support the idea that AI should be integrated carefully and ethically to support, not replace, human clinicians, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.

[Original]

I believe that AI has the potential to improve mental healthcare because it can make it easier for people to get help, catch problems early, and lighten the load on doctors and therapists. The article "Is AI the Future of Mental Healthcare?" shows how AI can help see mental health issues using things like digital data, analyzing speech, and chatbots. For example, AI can look at social media posts or at how someone talks to find signs of depression or anxiety, which could help get people help faster. Even though there are some concerns about losing the human touch and ethical issues, the benefits of AI make it a useful tool to work alongside therapists, not replace them. Overall, I think adding AI carefully into mental health services could lead to better outcomes for many people.

AI ( Chatgpt ): The article emphasizes that AI ethics is crucial because artificial intelligence is increasingly performing tasks once handled by humans, raising concerns about bias, privacy, and fairness. While this argument highlights important risks, it overestimates the effectiveness of ethics alone in managing AI’s impact. Ethical principles are often broad and difficult to enforce, especially given the rapid pace of AI development. A more pressing issue is how these guidelines are implemented in practice. Companies and governments do not always follow ethical standards, often prioritizing profit or efficiency instead. Therefore, the central problem is not just the presence of ethical concerns, but the lack of accountability and enforceable regulation. To truly address AI’s impact on society, stronger legal frameworks and oversight are more effective than relying on ethics alone. ( Karson Ward )

AI chatbots are increasingly being used as an alternative for individuals seeking mental health support but unable to afford traditional therapy. According to the article "Exploring the Dangers of AI in Mental Health Care," utilizing AI for mental health services presents potential risks, particularly related to privacy concerns. When interacting with a chatbot, there is a possibility that the information shared may not remain confidential and could be exposed without the user’s knowledge. In contrast, licensed therapists are legally obligated to uphold patient confidentiality, a safeguard that is not always guaranteed with AI systems.

I concur with the article's assessment, as I believe that patients’ personal issues should not be vulnerable to unauthorized exposure. When individuals seek help and discuss their personal struggles, they should be able to trust that their information will remain private and secure. Simply asserting that a chatbot is secure is insufficient—privacy is a critical concern, and not all chatbots are designed with the necessary protections to ensure confidentiality. While AI chatbots can serve as valuable tools for individuals who lack access to therapy, there must be clear regulations and safeguards in place to ensure that all conversations remain secure and private.

(original)

AI chat bots are becoming a thing for people who need help with mental health but cant afford to see a therapist. according to "Exploring the Dangers of AI in Mental Health Care." using AI for mental health could be a risk cause of privacy issues. When you talk to a chat bot the things you say might not be private and they could get shared without you even knowing. With a regular therapist they’re supposed to keep everything confidential but with AI, that’s not always guaranteed. I agree with the article because I think patients personal issues should not have the risk of being public. When you talk about your personal problems you should be able to trust that your information won’t be shared without you knowing. Just saying the chat bot is safe isn’t enough because privacy is super important and not all chat bots are designed to keep your info secure. Even though chat bots could help people who don’t have access to therapy, there should be rules to make sure everything stays private.

-samantha Garcia