<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Lost Discussion  by Michelle Gough</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk</link>
      <description>Unit 5 </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-02-19 16:53:19 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2019-02-19 17:55:53 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>1.) Know your terrain </title>
         <author>mgoughy15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332794952</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The first step in my opinion would be to get to know the land situation, and to the best ability aid the wounded. After the situation seems to be less critical, establish past experience that would aid the survival of the group. <br>Things like if anyone is a doctor, or nature experts, people who have hobbies that include survival like experience. Any past knowledge or experience that would aid the situation at hand. In the show for example Jacks past experience was beneficial from the get go in the survival sense. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-19 16:57:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332794952</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2.) Choose a Basic form</title>
         <author>mgoughy15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332797789</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This basic form has to work for the good not the ruling class is the first thing that I would establish. This would be virtually creating a new society. I would choose Polity the mix of democracy and oligarchy. There would have to be some method of everyone getting a vote with possible over sight from a few elected people. I feel like in this tense situation where people have been forced into a new life where there is constant fear of the unknown people have to feel like they have a say or there would be a high risk of anarchy. <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-19 17:02:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332797789</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3.) Connect to your government</title>
         <author>mgoughy15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332802086</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I think the land has to be surveyed for potential risks and rewards. They also have to have some plan for reduce attempts through the resources they have. I would have a unitary type system. It is basic and I think it keeps equality of the people in mind. I think I would have an institution of a board of three or four elected individuals who run elections and have a slight more say in implementation of the society they are building. Before any structures are implemented there must be a document created to outline their law of the land, most likely based on community morals and codes of conduct in the society.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-19 17:08:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332802086</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>4.)Building institutions </title>
         <author>mgoughy15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332813387</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Legislative: Board members<br> Board of 5 people (elected) who create policy based on the majority vote of the people. For law to pass on to evaluation must be a 3 to 2 vote by the board.<br>Executive: Head in charge , and a vice <br> Two individuals who head the board in charge , who with mutual agreement can call board members to evaluate the laws but overall enact these laws. if they  disagree with present laws they can push it through with support from 2 judges and 2 board members.<br>Judicial: Judges<br>3 Law enforcers who with a 3/3 vote and 4 board votes  can have laws enacted with out the executive individuals.  They evaluate every law that is created. <br>Monthly there will be a meeting where all members of the previously listed must be present and open to the public for the option to introduce Ideas and provide their opposition as well. <br>Re-elections will be held for all positions every 3 years and term limits for Co-heads, and judges is 3 terms.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-19 17:27:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332813387</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Why?</title>
         <author>mgoughy15</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332825868</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I feel like the government I have outlined for the hypothetical situation at hand would serve as a good way to even distribute power while trying to keep anarchy off the table. I think mutiny could be a big problem if the society is not careful. This system outline power structures but opportunity for people to speak their minds about what they may have issues with.  I think the institutions I created have a good check and balance system which I think is important to keeping order.  We have to think about the situation at hand as well this government will not be as sophisticated as some but the outline keeps people from holding all the power.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-02-19 17:47:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mgoughy15/r6112hyenqxk/wish/332825868</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
