New Misconduct Procedure by Usic

Procedure

usictech — 2024-02-22 12:03:45 UTC

Framework

usictech — 2024-02-22 12:03:56 UTC

usictech — 2024-02-22 12:04:44 UTC

Complete tasks 1-5 after the meeting and upload your answers here. Claim 1 hour at meeting rate for this homework. We will look at the answers quickly in Week 10.

What kinds of evidence can tutors provide for a misconduct investigation?

usictech — 2024-02-22 12:05:54 UTC

2024-02-22 12:27:50 UTC

usictech — 2024-02-22 13:56:24 UTC

Annotated bibliography (history button in Google Drive)

What students say in tutorials

Formative Assessments (if there is no work, if the work is completely different in summative submission)

Engagement and or attendance levels

Not following guidelines and writing unnecessary sections in summative submission

Emails to students after formative assessments

Google Drive documents (if uploaded for FA3 and FA4)

usictech — 2024-02-22 13:56:42 UTC

mismatch between when sources in Part A or bilbliography are not used in Part B of FA3 and final /or submission

Final submission totally new or not based on what we touched on in class or completing wrong sections included eg results

introductions to sections or writing where tutors are expecting/ having to see formulaic writing/ prescribed text

Answers

usictech — 2024-03-14 08:58:37 UTC

Sean

usictech — 2024-03-15 16:23:16 UTC

1. No hard evidence. Questions need to be asked of student. Difficult to penalise without clear evidence, however a warning should be given.

2. Very strong evidence. Heavily penalised score resulting most likely in re-sit.

3. Very strong evidence. Warning, mark penalty, help understanding plagiarism.

4. Strong evidence. Questions need to be asked. Warning, re-sit from scratch.

5. Very strong evidence. Re-sit from scratch. Warning.