<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Ch.9 May Taxpayers Challenge Federal Spending Laws? by Brian Delgado</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d</link>
      <description>Made with no regrets, whatsoever</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-04-11 15:27:11 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-01-07 23:21:13 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>PreRead </title>
         <author>323862</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165911862</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The federal court has the power to review by the supreme court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-11 15:34:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165911862</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>PreRead #2</title>
         <author>323862</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165912815</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>They can only use that power for certain cases that they meet.Could anyone question the constitutionality of a federal law challenge that law in court.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-11 15:37:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165912815</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Flast v. Cohen</title>
         <author>323862</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165914342</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Flast was in a group of people that were taxpayers who objected the federal funding for to be able to help support&nbsp;religious schools under the Secondary Education Act of 1965.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-11 15:43:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165914342</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Flast v.Cohen #2</title>
         <author>323862</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165915869</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>They believe they broke the the first amendment in many ways,one reason to use force to the religious group to pay taxes for their activities.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-11 15:49:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165915869</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Flast v.Cohen #3</title>
         <author>323862</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165918180</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The case was docket and was argued March 12 in 1968. Flast prove two items to the court, legislation was being attacked and showed the constitutional limitation. June 10,1968 the end result was decided. Flast were given both standards, and it came to 8- to-1 which made Flast win the case.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-11 15:58:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/165918180</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Aftermath</title>
         <author>323862</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/166108564</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>People who showed little or no interest besides the little amount of their taxes can be able to sue the federal court. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-04-12 15:52:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/323862/r2rw3xegm53d/wish/166108564</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
