Adam Grant, You can't say that: How to argue better by Kasia Kasztenna

liangliyun701 — 2025-02-13 03:14:31 UTC

In this article, the author employs the logical to show his/her view. The thread of Adam's logic is avoiding the attitude of always being right, recognizing lazy thinking, keeping critical thinking, embracing the shade of grey, and receiving the disagreement. The author also introduces the example, which is about the argument between him/her and his/her friend, to demonstrate the result of a nice argument that can help bilateral people who are in argument. This way is pathos.

2025-02-16 15:20:07 UTC

Grant establishes his credibility as a psychologist. He also mentioned that he spent YEARS researching about conflicts and how to “build our argument literacy”. He also referenced scientific studies and experiments to support his points as seen in para. 6 & 11 (Ethos)

The article begins with a story about debating with his friend about vaccines, getting the readers attention with emotional and relatable argument. (pathos)

He and his friend used data and evidence to support their arguments about vaccines. (logos)

2025-02-17 15:44:09 UTC

In this article, the author emphasizes logical thinking by rejecting the idea of that one must always be correct.( logos)

The Adm Grant, shares his arguments with his friends about vaccines showing audience that positive discussions can bring people together emotionally.(pathos)

As the author is a respected psychologist and researcher, the readers believes and trust over his ideas about how to engage in more productive conversations.( ethos)

liangliyun701 — 2025-04-09 21:57:30 UTC

Summary: This article describes the concept of mood and anxiety, introduces the Canadian Chronic disease surveillance system and the data colleting by this system, states the key findings from the data including percentage of canadian suffered this disorder.

Genry: academic research article. Authors apply sta

2025-04-09 22:04:29 UTC