- There was a good use of interviewing as they had a survivor to interview which gave a relateable feeling to the video.

- The video contained good explanations of the event.

Relevance: The video was good and stayed on topic the whole time, it was relevant as it gave detailed information on the topic and had a good interview, with a person who actually experienced it.

Presentation: It was good with the pictures which showed a lot about the project. It was good as it looked like a news report.

Evidence of effort: The video was long and detailed and they had thought and planned it clearly. They knew what they were talking about and they had very good information. 

Evidence for understanding the task: They knew what they were working on and showed a good understanding of the topic. The project also looked like a good news report.

Katie, Anna, Lakshit, Danae and Marta's video

Both Alicia and Ana were able to present a variety of different information, of those including the main events of the genocide, alongside statistics and dates of the event, clearly justifying and explaining the events and different aspects of the genocide. This was evident, especially in the explanation of the events, as well as being able to provide the audience with a different point of view of victims and politicians. 

 

Presentations:
They were able to clearly and properly present to the audience a majority of different informations, varying from events, causes and problems. They had a clear representation of they form of explanation, by providing different aspects of the events and people in the situation. It looked very professional. 

 

Evidence of Effort:
They seemed to put a lot of effort and thought into their content, as they

 

Evidence for understanding the task:

 

Relevance - The video was at times irrelevant to the Guatemalan genocide as there were often facts relating to the civil war that took place. 1/3

 

Presentation - The presentation of the video was average and very normal for most parts of the video. However, there was on instance of the use of costumes which ended the video on a better note. 2/3

 

Evidence of Effort - The video showed a good amount of effort and hard work. There was some good ideas and bits that show that there was good effort put into the video. 3/3

 

Evidence for Understanding - There was a decent showing of understanding for the topic while presenting the video. They showed and talked about good facts and made key points. 3/3

 

Relevance - The video mostly contained relevant information to the topic and there were valuable pieces of information. 2/3

 

Presentation - The presentation was not as good as the information presented. The starting of the video was interesting but otherwise, the editing was fairly bad. 1/3

 

Evidence of Effort - This video does show good evidence of effort and hard work as a lot of content put into the video was relevant and interesting shows effort from the creators. 2/3

 

Evidence for Understanding - Their understanding could have improved but there was enough to explain the topic well. 2/3

   

Content - 2/3
The video contains a lot of information and facts about the civil war but not the genocide. They made good use of facts to enhance they point they were making.

Relevance - 2/3
The video was unfortunately irrelevant to the Guatemalan genocide as there were often facts relating to the civil war that took place.

Presentation 2/3
The presentation of the video was average and very normal for most parts of the video. However there was on instance of the use of costumes which ended the video on a better note.