<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Supreme Court ~ First Amendment by Nikki</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk</link>
      <description>Made with no regrets, whatsoever</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-03-10 15:09:54 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-03-10 20:38:55 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Case name</title>
         <author>flickn</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386618</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Name of group members<br>First amendment freedom<br>Brief summary<br>Your opinion</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-10 20:26:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386618</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cantwell v. Conneticut</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386646</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Leslie, Stephanie, Samirah, Saron<br><br>Brief Summary-&nbsp; One day Jesse and two family members were walking around New Haven, CT which was a Roman Cathloic neighborhood . They were Jehovah Witnesses and felt that they had the right to <br>Our Opinion-</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-10 20:26:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386646</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Edwards v. South Carolina</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386654</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Evan, Tyler, Michael G., and Nic<br>First Amendment Freedom:<br>Peaceful Protest<br>Brief Summary: Segregation protestors&nbsp;were peacefully protesting in a city and drawing a large crowd, so the police told them to leave or be arrested.  They didn't leave and the police arrested them, even though there wasn't any violence.  Their 1st amendment rights were voilated, because there wasn't any violence in the protest and our first amendment says that we have a right to PEACEFULLY protest.  <br>Your Opinions</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-10 20:26:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386654</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Minersville Scool District v. Gobitis (1940)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386784</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Isabell Elizabeth Olivia Jaden Rian<br>Freedom of Religion<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-10 20:27:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386784</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Near V. Minnesota</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386855</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Robert, Madison, Umar, Sheldon, Shane.<br>freedom of press<br>the court struck dowm a state law allowing prior restraint as unconstitutinal. In so ruling, the court applied the first Amendment's protection of press freedom to the actions of state governments through the doctrine of incorporation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-10 20:28:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386855</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lee V. Weisman</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386866</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Group Members: Lorenzo, Roland, Juan, Finn<br>First Amendment Freedom: Religion<br><br>Summary: A Rabbi was invited to a graduation and decided to lead a prayer in which a student objected that the prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the first amendment<br><br>Opinion: We did not agree with the student because</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-10 20:28:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386866</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tinker V. Des Moines</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386901</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Camryn and Madeline<br>Speech<br>Two children wore armbands in protest of the Vietnam War to school and got suspended. They later went to court because the believed that the armbands were protected by freedom of speech and that they shouln't have been suspended. The court decided that they had the right to wear the armbands and that the school did not have the right to suspend them.<br>We personally think that freedom of speech should be protected in schools and that the school should not have the right to silence any student for their opinions as long as they are being peaceful.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-10 20:28:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/flickn/qvmia8ggfisk/wish/159386901</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
