Tenth admendment by Kyle Kimura (LMS) https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth It is for whatever powers the national government doesnt have en-us 2019-12-10 21:46:18 UTC 2026-02-25 05:14:01 UTC hello@padlet.com http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/feds-vs-state.jpg WHAT THIS AMENDMENT STATES: This amendment states that the powers that the national government that are not given by the U.S. constitution have are reserved for only the states or the people to decide upon. 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/422526295 2019-12-11 01:58:12 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/422526295 HOW DO WE EXPERIENCE THIS RIGHT IN OUR EVERYDAY LIFE: We experience this in our everyday life’s. These reserved powers are anything that are for the states to decide like how much sales tax there is, how fast you can go while driving on different roads, the minimum wage for jobs, forming fire and police agencies, Etc. Anything that involves state dependent things. 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/422528738 2019-12-11 02:06:45 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/422528738 WHAT WOULD IT BE LIKE IF WE DIDN’T HAVE THIS AMENDMENT: If amendment 10 wasn’t implemented then life wouldn’t be too different. Everyone is the United States will have a standardized everything. For example people will all have the standard speed limit 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/422534075 2019-12-11 02:28:26 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/422534075 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423012295 2019-12-11 21:55:35 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423012295 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423013525 2019-12-11 21:59:00 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423013525 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423019370 This states that the the constitution has the power and not the government.

]]> 2019-12-11 22:16:23 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423019370 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423055839 2019-12-12 00:41:02 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423055839 pritz vs. united states(1997): 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423071770 Pritz said that the chief law  enforcement officer can conduct backround checks for people who owned firearms in order to keep people safe. This was found constitutional by the supreme court 5-4.]]> 2019-12-12 01:45:25 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423071770 Bond vs. united states(2011): 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423075758 Bonds used chemicals to give Myrlinda Haynes(his wife) a chemical burn. In bonds defence he said that the federal law about chemical weapons intruded the 10th amendments power to the states. the court found that this did this was constitutional.]]> 2019-12-12 02:02:22 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423075758 Current. Event-Reno vs. condon(2000): 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423077806 I this case the federal government wanted to restrict the states from giving out private information that is given to them by obtaining a drivers license or registering a car. At the end, the states could do this because drivers information is an article of interstate commerce.]]> 2019-12-12 02:11:54 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423077806 Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association(2018): 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423557721 This case was about sports gambling. Sports gambling were only available in a few states. When New Jersey applied they got rejected. In 2010 the state was losing money so they they challenged the federal law if they can start sports gambling to get their revenue up. They said the because of the 10th amendment the states can decide if they wanted sports gambling or not. The vote was 8-1 saying that states weren’t allowed to regulate gambling.]]> 2019-12-12 21:17:19 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423557721 Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services(2010) 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423566791 This case is about same sex marriages. They found that in the constitution is said that a marriage is with people form the opposite gender but states wanted to recognize same sex marriages. The court found the opposite only gender marriage  was unconstitutional.]]> 2019-12-12 21:40:49 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423566791 3479022 https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423571208 2019-12-12 21:52:55 UTC https://padlet.com/3479022/quxdbtwx0bth/wish/423571208