https://padlet.com/haybales/laura-owen-s-timeline-qz4pd706aw8m8zv3/wish/2922086683

In this, Laura says "I am pregnant"

"All I am asking him to do is keep his word. If he does that, everything will be dropped."

In this, Laura says "I am pregnant"

https://padlet.com/haybales/laura-owen-s-timeline-qz4pd706aw8m8zv3/wish/2927054739

LO mentions that she doesn’t know how to swim

Sutter Health

https://padlet.com/haybales/laura-owen-s-timeline-qz4pd706aw8m8zv3/wish/2927054739

https://padlet.com/haybales/laura-owen-s-timeline-qz4pd706aw8m8zv3/wish/2927054739

This is not proof of pregnancy. This is proof that she has HCG in her body. Consulting with a physician is what is required for diagnosis (as it says on the lab test Laura took)

In Laura's deposition on March 1, 2024, she states under oath that the fetal sacs were a little bit smaller than the size of her hand. This is not consistent with 2 month 3 day old twin fetuses

The photo magically reappeared. David Gingras said he had the photo in his possession and that it was dated 07/23/23. This would be the alleged date of the "miscarriage".

Notice the horse jumping competitions just before and just after the alleged "miscarriage"

https://padlet.com/haybales/laura-owen-s-timeline-qz4pd706aw8m8zv3/wish/2979969593

In this email, Laura says "I am pregnant"

In this court document, Laura says "I am pregnant"

Laura filed this petition pro se

Source:

Going Deeper with Clayton Echard - “I Am Not The Father” | The Viall Files w/ Nick Viall

Source:

Going Deeper with Clayton Echard - “I Am Not The Father” | The Viall Files w/ Nick Viall

Edited Medium Article linked above

Original Medium Article: see December 8th

CE represented by Gregg Woodnick. LO represented by Cory Kieth

LO attends in person

"When did this miscarriage occur?" "I am not sure an exact date is known" "What month?" "I believe my client went to the doctor in mid November and that's when it was determined that she had had a miscarriage. We would believe that it was in the maybe month or two months leading up to that time"

This text and any text alluding to her being pregnant at the time of writing this article is edited out in the most recent iterations of the article

Judge Gialketsis

CE represented by Deandra Arena. LO represented by Joshua Lopez

LO on zoom - camera only chest up

"Are you pregnant with twins?" "100% correct" "How far along are you as we sit here today?" "I am 24 weeks along" "Can you provide us with your alleged due date?" "February 14th" "Who's your OBGYN?" "Dr. Makhoul and Dr. Higley" "Can you please repeat that?" "My main OBGYN is a perinatologist Dr. Makhoul" "You said you main OBGYN. Who else are you seeing? What other pregnancy related doctors are you seeing?" "Dr. Higley, who I saw last Friday and an epilepsy doctor who specializes in pregnancies"

Injunction against Laura awarded

In this, Laura says "I am pregnant"

On March 1, 2024 at Laura's deposition, she admits that this ultrasound was doctored. At first she admits to only changing the location from Planned Parenthood to SMIL. adding her name, because she went anonymously.

***Note: Laura did not mention any visits to Planned Parenthood or any ultrasounds in her affidavit released to the public dated April 19, 2024***

• Dates - The doctored ultrasound photo is dated July 7, 2023
• Dates - Gestational age (GA) on the ultrasound photo is listed at 6w4d, or 6 weeks 4 days. 6 weeks 4 days from May 20 was July 5, not July 7
• Actual gestational age on July 7 would be 8 weeks 6 days (conception date + 2 weeks), unless there is a known date of LO’s last menstrual period (LMP). If LMP is known, then that is the date that would be used for determining the gestational age. 

In her attorney's argument, he only mentions that she admitted to changing the location.

In this, Laura says "I am pregnant"

In this, Laura says "I am pregnant"

https://mccoolproofs.pixieset.com/2023blenheiminternationaljumpingfestival/scirocco91169/?pid=9936625200&id=10&h=MzAzODY0Mzc2NQ

https://blenheim.showgroundslive.com/classes/detail?cid=54306&sid=10018

• May 20: Date of Conception
• June 1: LO emails CE saying she is pregnant
• June 17: LO +HPT in front of Clayton
• July 7: LO claims to have an ultrasound showing twins, that is later shared with Clayton by one of her lawyers 
• August 1: LO files Petition to Establish Paternity
• August 23: LO files to Establish a Parenting Plan
• September 18: LO goes to media anonymously
• September 22: LO anonymous woman on reddit
• October 6: Paternity Test 1 - Little To No Fetal DNA
• October 11: LO release video sonogram (FAKE)
• October 24: LO has Baby bump in court
• November 2: LO states she is 24 weeks pregnant, and saw her OBGYN last Friday
• December 6: Paternity Test 3 - Little To No Fetal DNA (Test 2 got lost)
• December 8: LO publishes a Medium article
• December 28: Requests motion to dismiss paternity case as she is "no longer pregnant"

• May 20: Date of Conception (JD claims this was penetration without consent in her March 1 Deposition).
  There are texts and emails from LO contradicting this claim (both the SA and the penetrative sex allegation)

• September 2 - November 2: JD miscarries without her knowledge according to her CK lawyer's comments in the February 21 Status Conference Hearing

• October 16: JD takes an HCG test and has elevated HCG of 102, which could indicate 4-week pregnancy (which is way too low if she wants to claim that she believed that she was still pregnant in October)

So, by this timeline, she had to have miscarried between September 2 - November 2 (when she was 15-24 weeks pregnant) - if she wanted to claim she thought she was still pregnant in October due to elevated HCG levels at that, she would be claiming 21 week pregnancy, and this would be a stillbirth by Arizona law (20 weeks or later requires a death certificate). If she wanted to claim that she miscarried earlier but just thought she was pregnant in October, this would mean she never dispelled the fetal matter, which could potentially lead to sepsis due to retaining fetal matter and would require medical intervention for removal.

• May 20: Date of Conception (LO claims this was penetration without consent in her March 1 Deposition).
  There are texts and emails from LO contradicting this claim (both the SA and the penetrative sex allegation)

• July 23: DG (LO's Lawyer) claims that there are dated photos of expelled fetal matter with this date (LO earlier claimed she sent these photos to her sister, but had not disclosed a date at that time)

• October 16: LO takes an HCG test and has elevated HCG of 102, which could indicate 4-week pregnancy. Later, DG lawyer states that this could be the result of HCG levels dropping after miscarriage.

So, by this timeline, she had to have miscarried around July 23 (so within 9 weeks of her pregnancy). This may not require medical intervention (although it is highly recommended to consult with a doctor after this occurs to ensure that all fetal matter has dispelled and there are no complications). However, she claims that a telemedical provider saw those images and told her she had miscarried, so then...what's her argument for continuing with the case? Additionally, this timeline completely spits in the face of all her testimony during the IAH and her December 8 Medium article, where she claimed in both situations that she was pregnant.

This doctor's visit note had some interesting notes:

• LMP (Last Menstrual Period) - November 9, 2023

• Chief Complaint: Possible Pregnancy/Annual Exam

• G:2 (meaning two pregnancies in her lifetime)

• P: 0-0-2-0 (meaning her two pregnancies resulted in: 0 pregnancies that were full term, 0 pregnancies that were preterm, 2 previous abortions, 0 living children)

• SAB x1 (this means that one of the abortions mentioned above was actually a miscarriage)

• The purpose of this visit was "possible pregnancy" meaning they were going to be determining if she was pregnant at this visit. Had Laura tested positive for pregnancy during this visit, her G/P would be G:3 P: 0-0-2-0.

• In the visual observation of Laura, the doctor does not mention that she is "visibly pregnant".

  • I (Hay Bales) am a nurse and if I was assessing a patient for possible pregnancy, I would definitely indicate on the visual observation that patient was visibly pregnant.

• This also shows that she only self-reported two pregnancies to the MomDoc medical staff. One pregnancy that ended with an abortion and the other pregnancy ended with a miscarriage.

  • Previous "Pregnancies"

    • Victim 0, MM (pregnancy 1), MM (pregnancy 2), GG, CE

• This medical note does not prove pregnancy or miscarriage. Laura still has not provided diagnosis of pregnancy by a medical professional.

  • A doctor would have to confirm pregnancy before writing on a visit note that a patient did miscarry. Otherwise, it is patient-reported.

• May 20: Date of Conception (LO claims this was penetration without consent in her April 16, 2024 affidavit). LO states in affidavit that she did not want to have sexual intercourse with Clayton, but "Clayton inserted his penis inside by vagina for a moment." She also states, "Although Clayton’s conduct might fit the technical definition of rape or sexual assault, I did not and do not want to accuse him of any crime, nor do I want him to be criminally prosecuted."

• ***June 28: Clayton's expert OB/GYNs state that Laura messaged her neurologist at Barrow Neurological Institute on June 28, and stated that she visited a Planned Parenthood in California the weekend prior (June 24-25), which would correlate to a gestational age of 7w0d.***

• July 2: LO claims that she was driven by her mother to an appointment with Planned Parenthood in Southern California (did not specify which one) to obtain pills to medically terminate the pregnancy. She says she went in alone, received an ultrasound which verified that she was pregnant. In this version, she does not claim to have gone to the appointment anonymously. She says she took a photo of the sonogram on the screen with her phone, which she later changed from Planned Parenthood to SMIL and now claims that she changed the date from July 2 to July 7, but says she did not change anything else. LO says that she wanted to leave PP with abortion pills, but was not allowed to and would have to take the pills at PP, so she left without the pills.

• July 3: Clayton's experts state that LO messaged Scottsdale Perinatal Associates, where Dr. Makhoul practices, to inquire how soon a twin gestation could be determined. Clayton's experts state that twins can be determined by an ultrasound performed by 7 weeks gestation, indicating that LO should've already known that she was having twins if she had an ultrasound on June 24-25 or July 2.

• July 23: LO claims that she had some bleeding and passed what appeared to be a two small fleshy objects, no more than an inch or two. Clayton's experts mention that LO provided evidence that she had a Telehealth appointment and then called a miscarriage and abortion hotline (verification of actual appointments is unknown).

• July 25: LO says that she took another at home pregnancy test, which had a positive result.

• August 1: LO states that she felt fine and had no further bleeding, took another at home pregnancy test with a positive result, and filed the petition for paternity.

• August-October: LO states she gained weight and believed that she was still pregnant.

• October 16: LO had a "self-ordered" blood test for HCG with a result of 102.

• November 14: LO visits MomDoc for the first verified OB/GYN visit since claiming to be pregnant where she takes 2 pregnancy tests, both of which were negative. In the MomDoc report, it states that LO was told that a result of 102 at 21 weeks gestation meant she that had a nonviable pregnancy.

Note: Clayton's OB/GYN experts state that LO's medical visits that could be verified were all Telehealth visits until November 14.

In the records LO shares, it states she has had NO PREVIOUS PREGNANCIES!!!!!!

https://blenheim.showgroundslive.com/classes/detail?cid=54137&sid=10018

• May 25: "Let me tell you how serious I am about all of this since you think it was a plot to 'hold on' to you. If you were to tell me that we could date if I admitted to 'making it up,' as you called it before... I would tell you no-can-do. None of this is made up and I am genuinely panicked. I cannot be more serious about this.
• June 18: "Don't you think if I wanted to trap you I would have begged you to sleep with me????"

• June 28: "If you think about it, having sex with me is the safest thing you can do as this point. I am already pregnant and if we choose to go this route (and trust each other enough to have sex), then we are at the point where I would be taking abortion pills, so there is no risk."
• July 1: "Obviously, I would love to have sex in the future and feel like I am the safest person you could have sex with since I'm pregnant, but if you really think that like you said yesterday , my goal was to date and get pregnant during this time, we can absolutely hold off on it. However, it occurred to me that you might believe me more about paternity if you were inside of me and felt how tight I would be after not having sex in more than a year. Maybe then you'd believe that I hadn't been sleeping around, and again, you wouldn't be doing me any big favor... having sex with me is a privilege and not something I have done for a long time.”
  
  

• October 7: We consensually did stuff when we were both under the influence.

https://padlet.com/haybales/laura-owen-s-timeline-qz4pd706aw8m8zv3/wish/2979948852

LO/CE Reply to Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Amended Motion for Relief Based on Fraud, Dated April 30, 2024

LO shared a Dropbox folder, publicly, with Clayton Echard, Reality Steve, Dave Neal and posted it on Reddit. The Dropbox contained multiple documents attempting to prove to everyone that she was pregnant with Clayton Echard's babies. This screenshot was shared in the Dropbox to prove that she had been pregnant in the past with MM's baby and she claimed that he went to Planned Parenthood with her. Note: Dates on medical document appears to be August 2, yet court documents filed by Clayton Echard reveal that Laura had a surgical abortion on August 30, 2016 (validity of medical documents unknown).

Note: Metadata shows that nearly all documents were saved in Photoshop

https://padlet.com/haybales/laura-owen-s-timeline-qz4pd706aw8m8zv3/wish/2978506436

CPHA Foundation Equitation Championship Final, 22 & Over

Place – Entry Number – Horse – Rider – Trainer

6. 825 – SIG Chester – Laura Owens – Benson Carroll

August 26-28, 2016
Showpark Summer Classic, Del Mar Horsepark Contact: Stephanie Wheeler
Del Mar, CA 92014
949-443-1841

• Partial Granting - Respondent’s Amended Motion for Relief Based on Fraud

• Denied - Petitioner's Emergency Motion to Strike

• Denied - Petitioner's Request for Phone Conference

• Denied - Petitioner's Motion in Limine

• Denied - Petitioner's Request for Oral Argument

• https://www.paypal.me/HayBales08
• https://buymeacoffee.com/haybales