Roe V Wade by Ethan Warren https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn Ethan Warren en-us 2020-11-21 04:27:39 UTC 2020-11-21 04:55:27 UTC hello@padlet.com Roe V Wade ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947654820 (1973)]]> 2020-11-21 04:27:39 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947654820 The Justices on the case ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947657766 Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan Jr. Potter Stewart · Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist]]> 2020-11-21 04:32:08 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947657766 Background ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947658122 In 1970, Jane Roe (a fictional name used in court documents to protect the plaintiff’s identity) filed a lawsuit against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas, where she resided, challenging a Texas law making abortion illegal except by a doctor’s orders to save a woman’s life. In her lawsuit, Roe alleged that the state laws were unconstitutionally vague and abridged her right of personal privacy, protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments.


]]> 2020-11-21 04:32:44 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947658122 There was no lower court prior to the supreme court ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947660532 2020-11-21 04:36:14 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947660532 Petitioner's argument ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947662843 Jane Roe brought the case to the supreme court against Wade, because she believed that under the 14th amendment she had the right to abortion, and that the state should not be allowed to outlaw it.]]> 2020-11-21 04:39:46 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947662843 Respondent argument ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947663986 The 14th amendment had nothing to do with abortion and there is nothing in the constitution about abortion.]]> 2020-11-21 04:41:31 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947663986 question ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947666124 Does the Constitution recognize a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?]]> 2020-11-21 04:44:51 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947666124 dissenting opinion ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947668645 2020-11-21 04:48:40 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947668645 ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947668735 2020-11-21 04:48:48 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947668735 majority opinion ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947669242 2020-11-21 04:49:43 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947669242 ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947669920 2020-11-21 04:50:55 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947669920 Significance ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947670477 The significance of this is that it ruled against a state official of texas, and that it changed a tradition that had been going on for a long time. There had never been legal abortions before this case.]]> 2020-11-21 04:51:54 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947670477 Activism vs. Restraint ewarre8000 https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947671803 This is an example of Activism, because the judges used the constitution loosely and ruled in favor of social progressiveness.]]> 2020-11-21 04:54:17 UTC https://padlet.com/ewarre8000/qspl46t2y1f68nfn/wish/947671803