1) Removing phones reduces distractions and improves student focus. It also prevents cyberbullying and encourages face-to-face communication. However, it limits access to educational tools and makes it harder for parents to contact their children. Completely banning phones may also cause resistance from students and parents.

2)Allowing teachers to take phones discourages misuse and enforces discipline. It also helps maintain a focused learning environment. However, it may create conflicts between teachers, students, and parents.

complete ban on mobile phones in schools can reduce distractions and improve focus but may be impractical given their role in communication and learning. A more balanced approach, like restricting use during class but allowing it at breaks, might be more effective. As for teachers confiscating phones and returning them only to parents, this could reinforce discipline but may also cause unnecessary conflicts and logistical issues. A fairer alternative might be returning phones at the end of the day while involving parents only in repeated offenses.

The arguments for a complete ban on cell phones in schools are:

a) students would be more attentive in class, which would result in easier learning of the curriculum and better grades.

b) better development of students' social skills through direct communication between students

c) reduction of cyberbullying

d) and improvement of mental health.

My arguments against a complete ban on cell phones in schools are:

a) Cell phones can be crucial in emergencies for immediate communication with parents or guardians.

b) Parents can find it difficult to reach their children during the school day.

c) Smartphones can be valuable educational tools with access to research and learning applications

I think that involving parents in this way can reinforce the importance of respecting school rules and help students and teachers maintain discipline and order in the classroom.

But on the other hand, the negative consequence of this procedure could be a loss of trust between students and teachers. Parents may feel uncomfortable about having to come to school to collect a phone. Also, a big challenge for teachers can be keeping confiscated phones safe.

I think the best approach would be to allow phones, but under well-defined rules to make sure they are used responsibly and only for educational purposes.

As for teacher taking phones and returning to parents, I think that they could give to students as it is very difficult for parents to come and take the mobile at the end of school, especially if both of them are working.

Regarding teachers confiscating phones and returning them only to parents, this might feel too harsh for minor offenses and could create unnecessary conflict between teachers, students, and parents. A more balanced consequence—such as temporary confiscation until the end of the school day—would still enforce rules without escalating the situation.

As for taking phones from students who use them and give them only to parents, I strongly disagree!

2) If a student is caught using a phone and it's not an emergency, the teacher can take the phone, but giving it to parents might do more harm than good.

Giving the phone back to the student at the end of the day should be enough.

On one hand, smartphones can be valuable tools for education. They give students quick access to information, allowing them to do research, use educational apps, and stay organized with calendars and notes. They can also be helpful in emergencies, making it easy for students to contact their parents if needed.

However, phones can also be a major source of distraction. With social media, games, and messaging apps, it’s easy for students to lose focus during lessons. There’s also the risk of cheating during tests and the potential for issues like cyberbullying.

I think that a good compromise might be allowing phones in specific situations, such as for educational activities, while keeping clear rules to prevent distractions. This way, students can benefit from technology without it interfering with their learning.

As for the second question I think it's not necessary to call parents in case a student is using theri phone in class. I think it's the same point as the first question. We need to learn how to manage our screen time and be responsible on the internet and, even tho we need guidance in this, drastic measurements won't be useful in making us responsible and aware of the right and wrong uses of mobile phones and internet.

2️⃣ Teachers taking the phone and returning it only to parents – This might reinforce discipline and discourage phone misuse. On the other hand, it could create conflicts between teachers, students, and parents. Some may see it as excessive, especially if a student needs their phone for after-school activities or emergencies.

On the other hand, mobile phones can serve as valuable educational tools. They provide access to a wealth of information, learning apps, and resources that can enhance the educational experience. In emergencies, mobile phones can also offer a sense of safety and quick communication between students and parents or guardians. Prohibiting phones entirely might not take full advantage of their potential benefits in the classroom, and it might also be difficult to enforce in practice.

2. Allowing teachers to take a student’s phone and give it back only to the parent might discourage phone misuse, but it could also feel too strict and cause problems for both students and parents.

I strongly disagree with the idea of teachers confiscating a student’s phone and returning it only to their parents after school.

Bahasa Indonesia

Pengarang : agus Triyanto

membahas cara menyampaikan pendapat atau pandangan dengan disertai alasan dan bukti-bukti yang kuat untuk meyakinkan pembaca atau pendengar.Berikut adalah poin-poin penting yang biasanya dibahas dalam buku tentang argumentasi:

1. Pengertian dan Tujuan Argumentasi:

Pengertian:

Buku akan menjelaskan apa itu argumentasi, yaitu cara menyampaikan pendapat atau pandangan dengan memberikan alasan dan bukti yang mendukung.

Tujuan:

Buku akan membahas tujuan argumentasi, seperti meyakinkan pembaca, membuktikan kebenaran, mempengaruhi perilaku, atau mengajak pembaca untuk mengambil tindakan tertentu.

2. Struktur Teks Argumentasi:

Pendahuluan:

Bagian ini berisi pengantar tentang topik yang akan dibahas, latar belakang masalah, dan pernyataan pendapat atau tesis penulis.

Tubuh Argumen:

Bagian ini berisi alasan-alasan, bukti-bukti, fakta, data, contoh, dan hasil penelitian yang mendukung pendapat penulis.