“Using Data for Personalized Learning” by John Bullock

Math/ELA

2025-07-08 14:12:17 UTC

iReady, Eureka Math/Amplify

2025-07-08 14:13:14 UTC

Same as above :-)

dibels/amplify, do the math, eureka

2025-07-08 14:14:24 UTC

Lakeland

2025-07-08 14:14:33 UTC

It's not clear from the Resource Map or other resources what Lakeland uses to inform their small-groups / PL Block. Relevant data included in Lakeland's resource folder include iReady, Amplify, and DIBELS.

Dibels data, Iready data

2025-07-08 14:14:48 UTC

2025-07-08 14:15:06 UTC

There's a gap in consistently in evaluating efficacy of interventions.

3-6 week cycles

2025-07-08 14:15:13 UTC

observation, informal assessments, coaching conversations

2025-07-08 14:15:38 UTC

Progress monitoring is done 3-6 weeks

2025-07-08 14:15:58 UTC

Math/ELA

2025-07-08 14:16:15 UTC

EOMs, iReady Diagnostic assessments /Dibels, Progress Monitoring

Lakeland

2025-07-08 14:16:44 UTC

It's unclear how often Lakeland revisits student data to monitor the progress / effectiveness of interventions. One challenge I'm also anticipating is a highly transient student population. How might students coming in and out of the school throughout the year undermine whatever progress monitoring is in place?

2025-07-08 14:18:23 UTC

There should be a clear entry/exit criteria and for adjusting II/III plans, if there is consistent monitoring.

Consistent progress monitoring from teachers and interventionists. Informal and formal assessments. Constant monitoring and tracking. Focused and super intentional groupings. SST

2025-07-08 14:19:22 UTC

2025-07-08 14:19:48 UTC

observations, monitoring, coaching

Lakeland

2025-07-08 14:19:58 UTC

There is a robust team (interventionists, UMBC tutors, etc.) to implement Tier 2/3 interventions. It's less clear what progress monitoring looks like, how interventions are tweaked, etc.