<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>District of Columbia v. Heller 2008 by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h</link>
      <description>landmark supreme court case summary</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-03-06 17:20:42 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2019-03-08 16:16:12 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>aegonzalez0613</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/338510378</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The social changes and significance of banning the code meant that we are allowed to own loaded guns in our homes. By banning the code we also are protecting our second amendment right of owning a loaded gun.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://repealhydeartproject.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/ourrights-011.png" />
         <pubDate>2019-03-06 17:39:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/338510378</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>mineespinosa</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/338510747</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Dick Anthony Heller was a special police officer that was authorized to use a gun on duty. He decided to apply for a gun at home, it was denied. Soon after, he sued the district of Columbia. He argued that the code, saying that he wasn't allowed to own a loaded gun in his house, violated his second amendment ri.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/starlocalmedia.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/5/5e/55ef2986-8176-11e4-bcc2-8723a31be375/548a0300287cb.image.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-03-06 17:40:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/338510747</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>aegonzalez0613</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/338515608</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The legal issues of the code was that it was going against the second amendment. The constitutional question is "Do the provisions of the District of Columbia Code that restrict the licensing of hand guns and require licensed fire arms kept in the home to be kept malfunction violate the second amendment?"</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2ndAmendment.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-03-06 17:48:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/338515608</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>mineespinosa</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/338517418</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The court's opinion was that the code of The District of Columbia went against the second amendment right. It was illegal to not allow someone to have a gun in their home. The court believed that by limiting our guns in our house, we were losing the right to the second amendment. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://media.avvosites.com/upload/420/2014/03/court-opinion.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2019-03-06 17:51:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/338517418</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQH2ovb-nMI</title>
         <author>mineespinosa</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/339356245</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-03-08 15:59:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mineespinosa/qpjkx9pjjt7h/wish/339356245</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
