• Aufaita

• Azura

• Keysa

• Raifana

• Shillan

The provided text argues that cities should offer free public WiFi access to their citizens. It presents several arguments supporting this position, addresses a counterargument, and concludes that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks.

Thesis

The central thesis of the text is that cities should provide free public WiFi access to all citizens. The author believes this initiative is essential for bridging the digital divide, promoting social inclusion, and boosting a city's economy and reputation.

Arguments

The text uses several key arguments to support its thesis:

1. Internet access is as fundamental as other utilities like water and power, enabling people to educate themselves, find employment, and connect with others. The lack of access, particularly for low-income individuals, creates a digital divide that perpetuates

2. That free public WiFi fosters a more connected society and facilitates more efficient interactions between citizens and businesses. It highlights the convenience for residents and tourists, who can easily access information about local shops, restaurants, and services, thus boosting the local economy.

3. Providing free WiFi is framed as a tool for empowerment. It helps people from underprivileged backgrounds access critical, life-changing information, such as job opportunities, health advice, and online educational courses, without the financial burden of expensive data plans or contracts.

Conclusion

The overall conclusion is that the benefits of providing free public WiFi—including promoting social equality, economic growth, and a better reputation for the city—far outweigh any potential concerns. The author ultimately asserts that offering free internet access is a valuable and beneficial policy for any city, serving as a powerful tool for social and economic development.

“The internet is becoming so important in our lives that many people consider internet access as important as water or power supply" until "claim that cities should offer free public wifi access to everyone"

Arguments:

"The provision of city wide wifi services has several advantages" until “Free public wifi hotspot could help people from underprivileged backgrounds to have access to potentially life changing information, including job opportunities, health advice online courses etc"

Conclusion:

“A common counterargument for implementing free public internet access” until “the world’s technology, as well as the city’s economy, may advance significantly”

•Desi meylani salim

•Dina aulia ardiyanti

•Giska fakhira setiawan

•Siti anisa putri salsabila

•Tasya wardatul marwa

• Tesis: The author's central claim is that cities should offer free public Wi-Fi to their citizens.

• Arguments: Several points are used to support the thesis, including:

1. Improved quality of life: Free internet access makes it easier for citizens to find jobs, continue their education, and access various public services.

2. Economic and tourism boost: Providing free Wi-Fi in public spaces like stores, restaurants, and museums can stimulate economic activity. This also enhances a city's reputation and attracts more tourists and investors.

3. Reduced social inequality: Free internet access can help individuals from lower-income backgrounds get vital information and access to essential services, such as educational resources, health advice, or online courses.

4. Community empowerment: Free internet access can also empower underprivileged individuals and give them opportunities to find work or pursue further education.

5. Fostering innovation and competition: The author refutes the counter-argument that free internet would harm private internet service providers. The author argues that the internet is a public good, and competition should be based on service quality, not on the right to provide access.

• Conclusion: Internet should be considered a public good, capable of bringing global benefits and more good things to the world.

1. Nisrina

2. Raisa

3. Nala

4. Sarah

5. Septi

   
   

Thesis:

The internet is becoming so important in our lives that many people consider internet access as

important as water or power supply.

Arguments:

- A good way to avoid expensive roaming charges.

- Any mayor or government authority implementing this public service would see its popularity

boosted immediately.

- Tourists and visitors on business trips would also find their stay more pleasant.

- Free public WiFi hotspots could help people from underprivileged backgrounds to have access to potentially life-changing information, including job opportunities, health advice, online courses, etc.

Conclusion:

The idea that free Internet is given to everyone and everybody in cities can use it as a helpful

tool, as this brings more goods to people.

important as water or power supply. By offering free wireless connection, governments are helping those with less income and

resources.

Arguments : The provision of city wide wifi services has several advantages.an increasing number of citizens use the internet constantly.

Conclusion: Free internet access for everyone in cities is a valuable tool that can bring numerous benefits to people, fostering advancements in global technology and local economies.

Arguments:

1. Free public WiFi contributes to a better connected society and more agile interactions between citizens and business.

2. A convenient and technologically advanced city may also attract people to move in or visit.

3. By offering free wireless connection, governments are helping those with less income and resources.

4. Free public WiFi hotspots could help people from underprivileged backgrounds to have access to potentially life-changing information, including job opportunities, health advice, online courses, etc.

5. These initiatives can be considered tools for empowerment and social inclusion, as not everyone can afford to buy a computer or get an expensive phone contract with a data plan.

Conclusion: The idea that free Internet is given to everyone and everybody in cities can use it as a helpful tool, as this brings more goods to people. The world's technology, as well as the city's economy, may advance significantly.

Elisa

Meri

Nayaka

Shafa

Syaira

^{TESIS:cities should offer free public WiFi access to everyone.}

^ARGUMEN:

^{-governments are helping those with less income and resources.}

^{-empowerment and social inclusion,}

^{-help people from underprivileged backgrounds to have access to potentially life-changing information}

^{-including job opportunities, health advice, online courses,}

^{CONCLUSION:free Internet is given to everyone and everybody in cities can use it as a helpful}

^{tool, as this brings more goods to people.}

The Cities should offer free WIFI access to the cityzens because WIFI is important to our lives.

Argument

1. The internet is crucial for education, employment, and communication. Without access, low-income people struggle to improve their lives.

2. Free WiFi increases connectivity in daily life (communication, information search, transportation, shopping).

3. It will not hinder technological progress since service providers will continue to compete for government contracts, ensuring innovation.

Conclusion

Providing free public WiFi brings multiple benefits to citizens, governments, and the economy. It promotes inclusiveness, increases opportunities, and supports both technological and economic growth within the city.