<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Roe vs Wade (1973) - Hannah Beville by Hannah Beville</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7</link>
      <description>1st period</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2020-11-16 14:27:28 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2020-11-21 01:02:14 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Justices Reviewing This Case</title>
         <author>hbevil8148</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/927283230</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Chief Justice: </strong>Warren E. Burger (bottom middle)<br><br><strong>Associate Justices:</strong></div><ul><li>William O. Douglas</li><li>William J. Brennan, Jr.</li><li>Potter Stewart</li><li>Byron R. White</li><li>Thurgood Marshall</li><li>Harry A. Blackmun</li><li>Lewis F. Powell, Jr.</li><li>William H. Rehnquist</li></ul>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://media.liveauctiongroup.net/i/9667/10517175_1.jpg?v=8CDCF29478CDA50" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-16 14:30:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/927283230</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Case Background</title>
         <author>hbevil8148</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936811177</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- The name Jane Roe was created in order to protect the identity of the plaintiff in all the legal documents.<br><br>- Roe filed a lawsuit against Wade, challenging a Texas law making abortion illegal except by a doctor’s orders to save a woman’s life.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/13413307_f1024.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 14:27:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936811177</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Supreme Court Case Question and Answer</title>
         <author>hbevil8148</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936826793</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Q: Does the Constitution recognize a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?<br><br>A: Inherent in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is a fundamental “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s choice whether to have an abortion.<br><br><strong>Vote: 7-2 in favor of Jane Roe</strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 14:30:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936826793</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Judicial Activism or Restraint</title>
         <author>hbevil8148</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936858410</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I think this demonstrates Judicial Activism in the way that Roe's case is still a major topic in our current times. It is a major societal topic that is unclear in the ways the Constitution supports or denies the right to terminate a pregnancy. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 14:35:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936858410</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Petitioner&#39;s Argument </title>
         <author>hbevil8148</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936861731</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-Jane Roe filed suit on behalf of herself, and all those women who have in the past at that present time or in the future would seek termination of a pregnancy<br><br>-Stated that the Vuitch decision stated that abortions could be performed to help in life or death situation.<br><br>-Stated that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals tried to excuse themselves and say that the Texas law is stricter than D.C.'s. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 14:36:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936861731</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Respondent Argument</title>
         <author>hbevil8148</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936864026</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- There is nothing in the Constitution regarding birth control, birth, or abortion.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 14:36:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936864026</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Opinion of the Court</title>
         <author>hbevil8148</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936866614</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that states laws which made it illegal for a woman to have an abortion up to three months of pregnancy were unconstitutional, and that the decision on whether a woman should have an abortion up to three months of pregnancy should be left to the woman and her doctor to decide.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 14:37:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936866614</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lower Court</title>
         <author>hbevil8148</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936869328</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas<br><br>Decision:</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/sites/all/themes/us_courts_district/logo.png" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 14:37:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936869328</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Concurring and Dissenting Opinions</title>
         <author>hbevil8148</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936871420</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Dissenting Opinion of Justice Byron R. White:<br>-believed that the 14th amendment protected the right to determine whether a not a woman wants to terminate her pregnancy. <br><br>Concurring opinion of Chief Justice Warren E Burger:<br>-He thought it would be permissible to allow a state to require two physicians to certify an abortion before it could be performed.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2020-11-18 14:38:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/hbevil8148/qmv3xts4oy4fgpf7/wish/936871420</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
