https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte Made with a dash of wit en-us 2021-08-31 01:27:38 UTC 2021-09-06 06:03:58 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718605008 Members
Julia, Gwyneth,  Yi Tian, RuoLin, Stacey, Aqil

Limitations
1. Role of fathers not measured - Implicit assumption that the mother is the primary caregiver but in reality, other families might have other members of the family that play that role.
2. Sample only limited to low-risk mums
3.  No way to differentiate between attachment styles since they didn't classify their measurements in the beginning
4.  Less common variance found in this study compared to other studies]]> 2021-09-06 05:53:33 UTC https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718605008 https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718607659 Members: 
Kaylia Tan 
Casilda Tho 
Tan Kai LI 
Liu Huiyi
Heather I'anson -Holton
Zhang Yue Xiang
Discussion: 
- Didnt differentiate between insecure attachment styles (MBQS)
- Father’s involvement not measured
- didn’t clarify why they chose to measure autonomy support/ SDT as opposed to other measures of supporting exploration 
- ]]> 2021-09-06 05:54:53 UTC https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718607659 https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718609096 Shi Qing, Chloe, Amelia, Sue-Jane

Discussion Points: 
- What about father-child attachment 
- Generalisability? (the composition of the participants: half the children were first born; how many children in the family- diffusion of attention and thus affects transmission; Gender of participants because how mothers socialize sons and daughters are different; culture? - carried out in Canada) ]]> 2021-09-06 05:55:38 UTC https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718609096 https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718609315 names: 
Lee Le Xin 
Michelle Ang 
Janine Teo 
Tsong Jia Hua 

Discussion pts
- lack of mention of paternal attachment 
- the low-risk nature of the sample limited variability in the lower end of maternal sensitivity and child attachment security 
- AQS does not assign attachment classifications as does the Strange Situation procedure
- depends on primary care giver (might be grandma instead of mom)

]]> 2021-09-06 05:55:45 UTC https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718609315 https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718612297
Members: Edwin, Anna, Jin Fei, Jasper, Jamie, Rachael

Limitations:
1. Low-risk nature of the sample limited variability in the lower end of maternal sensitivity and child attachment security.
2. Validity issue - not applicable to all family settings
3. Study is heavily based on maternal side, should consider father side also
4. Environment effects may be nullified to a certain extent.

]]> 2021-09-06 05:57:21 UTC https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718612297 justinwya https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718621965 Paternal factors could be better considered
Good to examine maternal relationships, but less applicable if considering relationships in family network
Low-risk nature of the sample
Approximately half were first time mothers]]> 2021-09-06 06:02:49 UTC https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718621965 https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718624044 Members: Emily, Agatha, Annabel, Terence, Angela

Discussion points:
- Study only looks only at the maternal side of the parenting equation, and not the paternal side, and this may be a limitation because some models of parenting require consideration of the family as a whole system
- Sample is limited primarily to low-risk mothers, therefore they may be limited in generalisability
- About half of the mothers were first-time mothers - it is possible that a systematic difference may be present between first-time and non-first-time mothers, given that non-first-time mothers have their relationships/working models with their older children to draw upon]]> 2021-09-06 06:03:58 UTC https://padlet.com/jo751537/qm8pa6hqfgbpxdte/wish/1718624044