Some old buildings have historical signifiance. Those old buildings may have the part of history and culture of cities. For example, some meetings about the future developpment of cities had in this building. In another aspect, some individuals believe that those old buildings are the part of cities.

replacing: some places are unstated to expense finance for overhauling. Like appearance is hideous. not fashion anymore. and the facility is outdated. Waste too much money to maintain the sophisticated machine

First of all, the old buildings will prevent the development of modern society and also expend the urban area because the old buildings occupy the new buildings’ places. Besides, it also will affect the countryside area. Then the environment will influence by the urban area expansion.

Admittedly, maintain the old architectures can bring the back memories for the residents and it can also support the historical education.

There are a number of strong arguments to support the idea that governments should keep old buildings. Old buildings often have a sense of history.

While replacing old buildings with modern buildings can bring more benefits such as good for the environment, there are some important reasons to agree with the idea that governments should keep old buildings rather than build modern buildings.

In conclusion, governments should invest time in keeping old buildings.

There are majority people who believe that keeping and maintaining old architectures rather than replacing them with modern buildings. most of the old buildings has good reasons to be protected as they have history behind it and it must have been making the culture. Being transformed might have advantages such as it would look more nicer and cleaner, or it might be good to demolish them for safety reasons.

It generally claims that there are important to preserve old buildings rather than replacing them with modern buildings. 

idea1:

On the one hand, there are many advantages of saving old buildings such as reserving culture in the building. Some buildings have many histories and cultures. 

idea2:

However, modern building increases the sustainable environment. In the same way, the price of maintaining the old building is as same as replacing the new building.

some old buildings can reflect history and culture in that area and it have historical value. Some old buildings can be used as a tourist attraction which can make economic development.

Replacing

Some old buildings may easy to collapse and it will cause some security problems. Keep old buildings are not good for developing this area and stop the modernization of the city.

On the other hand, there are some arguments that  replacing them. Since these are not much modern society. Furthermore, in terms of safety, these will collapse.

Most of the historical humanity in each age have brought knowledge, it has a significant historical impact, some of which had assist witnessed, although most of the old buildings educate about the pass.

In order to make a decision about conserving the historical building or replacing it with modern buildings, it will only affect the way of how people look back at history, how people don’t appreciate or respect the past that has already been. It will be a negligence replacing the building heritage for the pass generation.

Finst of all, the Old building could reflect the history of the city， so the public could learn in general abut the past.

Second, maintining the old brildings could show the respection of the effort that the ancestors made.

Otherwise，in the process of replacing them with modern building will produce more pollution. To protect enviroments it's better to keep them.

soz for messaging here. i called the reception but no one answered. just letting you know that i won’t be attending the class as im quite sick today. hopefully ill see you tomorrow. thanku