<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Ben Trafton Chapter 14 APUSH by Ben Trafton</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb</link>
      <description>Leland 1B</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-11-20 20:14:51 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-03-15 10:37:16 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>How did the market revolution effect where international migrants came to AND its effect on the westward movement of Americans? </title>
         <author>bentrafton</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138960568</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Irish, being poorer and not self sufficient enough to move out west, immigrated into the eastern side of the US once they moved here and settled in there. The germans, created a westward influx as they were proficient enough to create a westward movement. The Americans could get more tools, supplies, and money from the market revolution making it easier to make a life for themselves out in the West.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.ushistory.org/us/images/00000209.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-20 20:28:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138960568</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did entrepreneurs help create a market revolution in production and commerce, in which market relationships between producers and consumers came to prevail as the manufacture of goods became more organized? </title>
         <author>bentrafton</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138964088</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div> Entrepreneurs created inventions such as the steel plow, mechanical reaper, cotton gin, interchangeable part, the telegraph,and the steamboat. These along with the work of Samuel Slater and the Lowell system created more efficient production and better relationships between producers and consumers.</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.basiccarpentrytechniques.com/Technology%202/John%20Deere&#39;s%20Steel%20Plow/images/i016.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-20 21:11:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138964088</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did innovations, including textile machinery, steam engines, interchangeable parts, the telegraph, and agricultural inventions, increase the efficiency of production methods? </title>
         <author>bentrafton</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138965547</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>These innovations led to many inventions which were extremely efficient and created new and improved production methods such as the Lowell system, the modern mass-production/assembly line method that the North used, and the modern clothing industry. These inventions that came with these methods led to the tools needed to make these methods possible and as fast as they were.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://study.com/cimages/multimages/16/musket.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-20 21:30:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138965547</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did legislation and judicial systems support the development of roads, canals, and railroads, which extended and enlarged markets and helped foster regional interdependence? </title>
         <author>bentrafton</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138966408</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The markets were enlarged and extended by railroads, canals, and roads such as the National Road, the turnpike, and the Erie Canal, which were supported by the state government system even if not federally supported fully in the case of two of them. These made a regional interdependence more between the North and Midwest as they connected more together than with the South.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://media1.britannica.com/eb-media/58/125958-004-9FC36AF0.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-20 21:43:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138966408</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did transportation networks link the North and Midwest more closely than either was linked to the South?</title>
         <author>bentrafton</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138967847</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The major canals and railroads radiated out of the North which made it connect inevitably with the West, and this led too the increasing conjoining and connectivity between the West and North. There were a few connections between the west and north with the south, but not nearly enough as the economy just wasn't as related.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch2en/conc2en/img/map_american_canals_19th.png" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-20 22:08:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138967847</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did the changes, caused by the market revolution, have on US society, workers’ lives, and gender and family relations? </title>
         <author>bentrafton</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138970166</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Increasing men and women linked their economic fate to the new market economy, and the home also became more of a safe haven than a working area. This also led to the more domestic, special and separate, sphere for women. Negatively though, the gap between the rich and the poor continued to increase even faster. Overall there was an increased standard of living.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/09.11/images/rich_poor.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-20 22:44:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138970166</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did the growth of manufacturing drive a significant increase in prosperity and standards of living for some?</title>
         <author>bentrafton</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138973668</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It led to a greater value of living as the home became less of a working environment. The replacement of previously handmade items now bought now led to an changes status in a more independent fashion for women that worked at the house.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-20 23:38:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138973668</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>In this chapter, the authors maintain that “clearly the early factory system did not shower its benefits evenly on all.” What relevant historical evidence can you find in this chapter or the previous ones that supports, modifies, or refutes this assertion? </title>
         <author>bentrafton</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138973950</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The development of an increasing wage gap was one way this didn't benefit the poor. Also, the newfound friendliness between he north and the west as transportation supported did not help the south in their economic opportunities either.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-11-20 23:44:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/bentrafton/qigwdbogw0fb/wish/138973950</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
