Yemeni Civil War by Zakariyya Elrashidi https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6 By:Zak, Ali, Jed, Tyler en-us 2018-03-27 17:09:27 UTC 2026-02-12 15:55:02 UTC hello@padlet.com Jeds first source jkosivi19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246710095  Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
  • Are the links functional? 

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
  • Who is the intended audience? 
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?


Currency:
1. This information was published  in march 25, 2018
2. The information has been revised
3. The information is current
4.  yes the link works

Relevance: 
1. Yes this article relates to the topic
2.  People interested the civil war in yemen
3. The information is at a good level
4.Yes I checked other sources before using this one

Authority:
1. Al Jazerra News
2. There is no specific author
3. visiting the country
4 Twitter
5. yes it has .com

Accuracy:
1. aljazeera.com
2. yes it has evidence
3.The information has been reviewed
4. another source
5. it is free of emotion
6. There are no errors

Purpose:
1. The purpose of the info is to inform
2. They make it clear that they are writing the article to prevent this war
3. The information is fact
4. It is impartial
5. Political and cultural

]]> 2018-03-27 22:34:04 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246710095 Jeds second source jkosivi19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246712417 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
  • Are the links functional? 

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
  • Who is the intended audience? 
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?

Currency:
1. February 28, 2018
2. This info has been updated
3. The information is up to date
4. The links are functional

Relevance:
1. It relates to the topic
2. People interested in whats going on between the u.s and Yem
3.  The topic is advanced enough
4. Using other websites

Authority:
1. The Guardian
2.Lauren Gambino
3. Seeing what can be done to help
4. Twitter
5. .com

Accuracy:
1. theguardian.com
2. It has a great amount of evidence
3.It has been reviewed
4. Another source
5. a little bit of emotion behind it
6.It has no errors

Purpose:
1. Inform
2. Yes the intention is clear
3. It is factual
4. Impartial
5. Political and cultural

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/28/yemen-saudi-arabia-war-us-support-senator-push-to-end



]]> 2018-03-27 22:53:15 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246712417 Jeds third source jkosivi19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246712520 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
  • Are the links functional? 

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
  • Who is the intended audience? 
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?

Currency:
1. March 7, 2018
2. It has been reviewed
3. It is up to date
4. It is functional

Relevance:
1. It relates to the topic
2. People who want to help out the people of yemen
3. It is advanced
4. other sources and websites

Authority:
1. Cnn
2. William Hartung
3. Experience
4. Twitter and facebook
5. .com

Accuracy:
1. cnn.com
2. The evidence is there
3. It has been reviewed
4. whole other source
5. A little emotion behind it
6. No errors

Purpose:
1. Persuade
2.  The intention is clear
3. It is opinionated
4. Objective
5. Political and cultural

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/07/opinions/congress-saudi-funding-yemen-opinion-hartung/index.html



]]> 2018-03-27 22:53:55 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246712520 Jeds last source jkosivi19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246712568
Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
  • Are the links functional? 

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
  • Who is the intended audience? 
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?

Currency:
1. March 7, 2018
2. It has been reviewed
3. Up to date
4. It is functional

Relevance:
1. It relates to the topic
2. People who want no involvement with yemen
3. Advanced
4. Using other websites

Authority:
1. Defense one
2. Lawrence Wilkerson
3. Experience
4. Twitter and facebook
5. .com

Accuracy:
1. defenseone.com
2. There is evidence
3. The info has been reviewed
4. Different source
5. Lots of emotion
6. It doesn't have any errors

Purpose:
1. The purpose is to persuade
2.  The intention is clear
3. Opinionated
4. Objective
5. Political and cultural

http://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2018/03/stand-constitution-stop-unauthorized-involvement-yemens-civil-war/146465/






]]> 2018-03-27 22:54:28 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246712568 Tyler Last source tmcpherson19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246984257 https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/02/the-war-in-yemen-and-the-making-of-a-chaos-state/551987/
Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
Feb 3 2018 
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
No
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
It is current
  • Are the links functional? 
Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
Yes
  • Who is the intended audience?
People who have family there or want to visit there. 
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?
Ben watson/The Atlantic/Defense One

  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
Yes, The Atlantic
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic?
 N/A
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
No
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org
yes .com
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
yemen
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
no
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
Yes
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
no
Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade?
inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentior purpose clear? 
No
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
no
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
yes cultural and religousp
]]> 2018-03-28 16:41:41 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246984257 Ali First Source aalsouaijet19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246985800 https://www.rescue.org/press-release/irc-report-failed-public-health-system-quiet-killer-yemen


Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? N/A

  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Current
  • Are the links functional? 

Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
People interested in this part of the world
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
IRC(International Rescue Committee)
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
No
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
N/A
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
Media Contacts
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 

.org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
IRC reports
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
Yes
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
Yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
Biased
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
Inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
Impartial
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
Political


]]> 2018-03-28 16:44:56 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/246985800 Ali Second Source aalsouaijet19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247046519 https://reliefweb.int/report/yemen/yemen-world-s-worst-humanitarian-crisis-enters-another-year


Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
Feb 9, 2018
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
Yes
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Current
  • Are the links functional? 

Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
Liberals
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
ACLED Report
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
ReliefWeb
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
N/A
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
ReliefWeb
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
Int
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
ACLED Report
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
Yes
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
Yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
Biased
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
Inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
Impartial
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
General Bias

]]> 2018-03-28 18:58:35 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247046519 Ali Third Source aalsouaijet19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247047671 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/23/world/middleeast/yemen-cholera-humanitarian-crisis.html



Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
Aug 23, 2017
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
Yes
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Current
  • Are the links functional? 

Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
Average Person
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use?
Yes 

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
SHUAIB ALMOSAWA, BEN HUBBARD and TROY GRIGGS
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
No
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
N/A
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
Yes
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 
.com

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from?
Multiple Sources 
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
Plenty
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
Yes
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
Yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
Yes
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
Persuade/Inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
Impartial
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
Personal

]]> 2018-03-28 19:02:02 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247047671 Ali Fourth Source aalsouaijet19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247048422 https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/01/18/yemen-all-sides-fuel-humanitarian-crisis 


Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
Jan 18, 2018
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
Yes
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Current
  • Are the links functional? 

Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
Average person
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
Human Rights Watch
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
N/A
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
N/A
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
Yes
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 
.org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
HRW
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
Yes
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
Yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion?
Biased 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
Inform/Persuade
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
Impartial 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?

Personal

]]> 2018-03-28 19:04:16 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247048422 Zak's first source zelrashidi19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247308729 https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/09/yemen-the-forgotten-war/


Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
Jan 23, 2015
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
No
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Current
  • Are the links functional? 
Yes
Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
People that want to be informed about the war.
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes

  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
Amnesty international
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
N/A
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
They are a well known organization. 
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
N/A
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org
.org
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from?
different sources 
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
Yes 
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
Yes 
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion?
Yes 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)?
No 

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade?
to inform
 
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
impartial
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
institutional 
]]> 2018-03-29 16:03:12 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247308729 Zak's second source zelrashidi19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247370579 https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/06/key-facts-war-yemen-160607112342462.html

Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
March 3, 2016
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
no
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
current
  • Are the links functional? 
yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
people that want to be informed about the problems in yemen.
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
yes, at an appropriate level
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
al jazeera
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
N/A
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
they are a very well known and trusted news outlet.
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
no
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org
.com

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
news reports
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
yes
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
yes
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
no
Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
to inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
objective
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
institutional
]]> 2018-03-29 18:48:02 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247370579 Zak's third source zelrashidi19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247372715 http://thehill.com/opinion/international/380046-saudi-arabias-war-in-yemen-a-view-from-the-ground

Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
3/26/18
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
no
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
current
  • Are the links functional? 
yes
Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
people that want to be informed about saudi arabia's contribution in the yemeni civil war
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
michael knights
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
N/A
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
he has many other articles
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
no
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org
.com
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
news reports
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
yes
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion?
yes
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
no
Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
to inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
impartial
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
personal bias
]]> 2018-03-29 18:55:35 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247372715 Zak's fourth source zelrashidi19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247374672 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29319423

Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
january 30th 2018
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
no
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
current
  • Are the links functional? 
yes
Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
people that want to learn more about the civil war in yemen
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
bbc news
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
N/A
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
they are a trusted source with many news articles.
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
no
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org
.com
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
news reports
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
no
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
yes
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
no

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
to inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
no
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
institutional
]]> 2018-03-29 19:02:04 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247374672 Tyler mcpherson 3rd source https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/yemen-crisis tmcpherson19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247416682 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 
When was the information published or posted? 
april 19th 2016
Has the information been revised or updated? 
yes
Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
current
Are the links functional? 
yes
Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 
Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
Who is the intended audience? 
people interested in yemen
Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
yes
Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
yes
Authority: The source of the information. 
Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
zachary laub/council on foreign relations
Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
N/A
What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
No
Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 
no .org 
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

Where does the information come from? 
the author and primary sources
Is the information supported by evidence? 
yes
Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
no
Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
yes
Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
no

Purpose: The reason the information exists.
What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
yes
Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
fact
Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
no
Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
cultural,political an religious

]]> 2018-03-30 00:43:37 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247416682 Tyler McPherson 2nd source tmcpherson19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247418296 http://time.com/yemen-saudi-arabia-war-human-toll/ 

 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 
When was the information published or posted? 
N/A
Has the information been revised or updated? 
no
Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Are the links functional? 
current
Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 
Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
yes
Who is the intended audience? 
people interested in yemen
Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
yes
Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
yes
Authority: The source of the information. 
Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
manon quérouil bruneel/Time/véronique de vigueire/ Getty images
Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
no
What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
no
Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 
yes .com
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

Where does the information come from? 
photographers that were there and the author
Is the information supported by evidence? 
yes
Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
no
Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
yes
Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
yes
Purpose: The reason the information exists.
What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
Inform and teach
Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
yes
Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
fact
Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
no
Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
political,cultural,and religous

]]> 2018-03-30 01:07:57 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247418296 Tyler McPhersons 1st source tmcpherson19 https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247423617 https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/28/yemen-saudi-arabia-war-us-support-senator-push-to-endhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/28/yemen-saudi-arabia-war-us-support-senator-push-to-end

Currency: The timeliness of the information. 
When was the information published or posted? 
Feb 28 2018
Has the information been revised or updated? 
No
Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Are the links functional? 
current
Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 
Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
yes
Who is the intended audience? 
people of the US and yemen, and military personal
Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
yes
Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
yes
Authority: The source of the information. 
Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
lauren Gambino/The gaurdian
Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
yes, The gaurdian
What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
N/A
Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
yes
Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 
yes .com
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

Where does the information come from? 
US senators
Is the information supported by evidence? 
yes
Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
no
Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
yes
Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
no 
Purpose: The reason the information exists.
What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
Inform
Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
Yes
Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
Fact 
Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
yes
Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
political and cultural


]]> 2018-03-30 02:27:19 UTC https://padlet.com/zelrashidi19/qighr0yiqgu6/wish/247423617