https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu Made with a bold sensibility en-us 2017-02-08 15:20:36 UTC 2017-05-17 11:52:37 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152506523 example 1:He/sheused text evidence and proper wording. They could have used more of their own opinions. Example 2: We think that he or she could've used more text evidence and better wording. He or she used a good amount of his opinion. 
Example 3: We think that he or she used the word courage to much. He used a lot of text evidence and not a lot of their own opinion. Example 4: His sentence was to short and he or she did not use their own opinion. ]]> 2017-02-08 16:01:44 UTC https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152506523 https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152506771 E1) 
1. He used text evidence
to answer the first question and he used his own words to answer the essential question.
2. He did alright.
3. He could have explained more.
E2)
1. He mentioned his own thoughts.
2. He forgot to include text evidence.
3. He could have explained it better.
E3)
1. He included text evidence, and he mentioned his own thoughts.
2. He did okay.
3. He could have explained it better.
E4) 
1. He explained his thoughts.
2. He did okay.
3. He could have explained it better.]]> 2017-02-08 16:02:18 UTC https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152506771 https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152507260
E1. I liked example 1 and overall I liked the way it was written 
E.2 I think example 2 wasn't good because of text evidence and grammar purposes 
E.3 I think example 3 he/she didn't clearly state the answer the question 
E.4 I think he/she failed to give text evidence for the question ]]> 2017-02-08 16:03:16 UTC https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152507260 https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152507392 1) he could a little more specific. More text evidence.

2) instead of saying " study and you study" it could of said another word.

3) this person could have had a little more evidence 

4) this person did not add the second question. More evidence to there response. ]]> 2017-02-08 16:03:32 UTC https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152507392 janmohdalina https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152508138 Example 1 was good because it has good details.

Example 2 was unclear.

Example 3 was good because it had more text evidence than example 2.

Example 4 answered all the questions, but it was a pretty short and response didn't have much details, or text evidence.]]> 2017-02-08 16:05:06 UTC https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152508138 https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152509207 (1)Example 4.  That person gave one example of courage.
(2) They should've restated the question.
(3) He needed to include more text evidence and detail.]]> 2017-02-08 16:07:20 UTC https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152509207 https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152512745 For example 1 the person could be more detailed about how intelligent can show bravery. Example 2 didn't make sense and didn't answer the second question. Example 3 spelled a word wrong and didn't answer the second question. Example 4 didn't really answer question two.]]> 2017-02-08 16:14:57 UTC https://padlet.com/cpantazis/qhgo6cbbrgiu/wish/152512745