<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Remake of The Stanford Prison Experiment  by Lacey Dietrich</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur</link>
      <description>1. Review the informed consent posted on the website for this study. Does it contain all essential elements of an informed consent? What is missing? 2. Was this study ethical? Should it have ever been approved? Why or Why not? 3. What can we learn from this study?</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-09-11 22:36:11 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-11-23 14:20:56 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Should it have ever been
approved? Why or Why not? 

</title>
         <author>laceyleigh143</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987845</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;I feel like this is a hard question to answer. The main problem with this study was that there was a lack of detail and information in the consent. If the originally consent had all four elements in which the prisoners knew exactly what the study involved, would the Stanford Prison Experiment even be an issue? The Stanford Prison Experiment was reviewed and approved by a committee, although, there are needs for stricter review panels due to the outcomes of this experiment. With stricter review panels, this can identify if there are ethical concerns and if so, address them prior to the start of the research. That being said, the consent did lack important information which ultimately led to harm for the participants. With this, the experiment should have not been approved. After the study was complete, participants involved had to have extensive follow-up to ensure there was no emotional trauma from the experiment itself.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-09-11 22:36:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987845</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Code of Ethics in Research</title>
         <author>laceyleigh143</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987846</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>According to Ann, the following is the laundry list of violations to the Code of Ethics and General Principles that this experiment involved:</div><div>General Principle's not adhered to by this study:</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Principle A: <em>Beneficence and Nonmaleficence</em> - to do good and avoid harm</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Principle B: <em>Fidelity and Responsibility</em> - to show high standards of competence in their work</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Principle C: <em>Integrity</em> - honest communication and truth telling</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Principle D: <em>Justice</em>&nbsp;</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Principle E: <em>Respect for People's Rights and Dignity</em></div><div><br>Code Violations:</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Standard 2.01a, 2.01c, Boundaries of Competence</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Standard 3.04, Avoiding Harm</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Standard 3.05, Multiple Roles (Phillip Zimbardo functioning in two roles: in charge of experiment and participating as the warden)</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Standard 3.08, Exploitive Relationships</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Standard 3.06, Conflict of Interest (Phillip Zimbardo functioning in two roles: in charge of experiment and participating as the warden)</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Standard 8.02a (1,2,3,4), Informed Consent to Research</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Standard 8:04, Client/Patient, Student, and Subordinate Research Participants</div><div>•&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Standard 8.07a &amp; 8.07b, Deception in Research&nbsp;</div><div>Standard 8.08a, b, &amp; c, Debriefing&nbsp;<br><br>Reference:&nbsp;<br>Ann, S. (2016). The Stanford Prison Experiment - Ethical or Not? Retrieved September 11, 2016, from http://sheilaann33.blogspot.com/2012/09/httpwww.html</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-09-11 22:36:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987846</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What is missing?</title>
         <author>laceyleigh143</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987847</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In regards to the Stanford Prison Experiment, disclosure of essential information is the first thing that is missing. There was no information in the consent regarding a description of the purpose or the duration of the study. Also, there was lack of a description regarding procedures that the participants in the study needed to follow and identification of procedures that might have been experimental. Participants were not informed regarding probable risks or discomforts that might arise from the study such as; physical, emotional, social or economic. There was no information regarding the benefits of the study in the consent that was signed by each participant. The participants were not given an explanation regarding any compensation or medical treatments if an injury were to occur. If there were any type of medical injury, treatment would have to be described by the type and extent of treatments. There was no information in the consent regarding who to contact for answers to questions about the research during the conduction of the study and whom to contact in the event of a research related problem, such as an injury. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/130431199/1d239d06ad6d6c4bf69568083471924b/slide_50.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-09-11 22:36:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987847</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Newspaper Cliping</title>
         <author>laceyleigh143</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987848</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://stanfordprisonexperiment-appsych3a.yolasite.com/images-video-links-questions-references.php" />
         <pubDate>2016-09-11 22:36:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987848</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> Review the informed consent for this study. Does it contain all essential elements of an informed consent?</title>
         <author>laceyleigh143</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987849</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>         The Stanford Prison Experiment does not include all the elements of a informed consent, which is one of the reasons is was so unethical. Essential elements for an informed consent must include: disclosure of essential information, comprehension, competence, and voluntarism.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.fda.gov/ForPatients/ClinicalTrials/InformedConsent/default.htm" />
         <pubDate>2016-09-11 22:36:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987849</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What can we learn from this study?</title>
         <author>laceyleigh143</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987850</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>We have learned that this study has demonstrated the need for consents that covers specific items in order to protect the participants of a study. Human rights also needs to be addressed and should include the following: self-determination, privacy, anonymity and confidentiality, fair treatment, and protection from discomfort and harm. As research continues to evolve, human rights and ethical considerations must be acknowledge and protected.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-09-11 22:36:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987850</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Was the study ethical?</title>
         <author>laceyleigh143</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987851</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Stanford Prison Experiment was not ethical. Participants of the study were not fully informed of what the experiment encompassed. This includes being arrested at home, harm to the participants, along with stress and humiliation.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://static1.squarespace.com/static/557a07d5e4b05fe7bf112c19/55ba94ace4b041382355060d/55bb95bee4b0b24699f40b37/1439834775632/32-doing.push-ups.jpg?format=750w" />
         <pubDate>2016-09-11 22:36:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987851</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Stanford Prison Experiment</title>
         <author>laceyleigh143</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987852</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-09-11 22:36:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/laceyleigh143/qgtwduduf1ur/wish/122987852</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
