Nowadays, Furthermore, people still think that giving money to homeless people is the best choice. But in my opinion, this option is not. Firstly, it makes gives homeless people the thought a feeling that the way to get money is too easy easily, and thus they will not appreciate it or don't know how to keep money by the right way. In other certain cases, they will be stolen a large amount of money by gang of thugs, making them wounded. Secondly, these certain people will get dependent on others. They will use the money for alcohol, drugs, gambling or some such something like that. This will create more social issues/problems instead of solving the issue of homelessness. It will make our community more seriously, hardly to get out of this accident.

First of all, donating providing money to for the homeless is possibly not the best way to help them homeless people as from my perspective notion. It is because that giving homeless people free money may lead them into the dependence of on other people. Then, they will just simply seat sit in one place and wait for other people to continually donate to them without trying to find their own job for their own life. Moreover, this is just a temporary solution because that money may be used in for a different purpose instead of using it for their difficulties of life. For example, that money could be spent on the parties or, more seriously, could be drugs or addictive substances. So i think there will be more proper solution for this topic instead of giving away money to homeless people.

In my conclusion, I disagree with about this idea. Because It will make the homeless people depend on in society and It can create a make bad society but even though some people can become independent using develop by this money.

On the others hand some citizens believe that giving money to homeless people is generousity and gooodness. They think that the people who don’t help homeless people are selfish.

To conclusion, no one wrong on this problem but I believe that the government should create a solutions to support the homeless people as a public house for them.

À mà nay con bị sốt nên ko đi học được nhé thầy

In With respect to the first view, there are some reasons opposing this view. Firstly, History is a subject which are do not often used in real life. It is an unnecessary subject in many jobs. For example, when we work, we do not use history to work. Moreover, history only has one period in a week. Therefore, this is a reflection of how it is perceived to be unimportant by today education system/it is not important to study too much. For example, we do not calculate or think too much in this subject because it is simply learnt something by heart.

As for the second view, there are some reasons supporting this view. Science and technology are used to practiced in many jobs. It is They are necessary to help a country develop. For example, we use science and technology to create many good things for everyone. Moreover, these subject is developing in world. Because the society is developed by science and technology. For example, the smart phone which make convenience for people in many work.

In conclusion, I think the science and technology which are the important subject now. Therefore the history is not important but It is necessary because people can study experience in the past.

To begin with, learing History is decisive but its not the most important. At first, History give to you a wealth of knowledge about the past of countries around the world. Knowing about history allows this knowledge to be passed down to later generations and prevent history from being lost it will better if you retransmit to the younger generations. However, the act that learn by heart in Studying history requires students to learn by heart a lot of knowledge which is not comfortable for current generation of students, for the reason that learing History can not apply to real life. So maybe History is not enough useful enough in today's world.

Furthermore, the other people in today's world the idea of other people is true, that History is not as extensive as a the subject as the likes of Science and Technology. On the ground that these subject issues makes it easy to find works and make money in today's society, because of increasing modern society requires a workforce which is skilled in science and technology.

Overall, the information of using electrical appliances usage showed that all of them increased in this period. On the opposite way/conversely, the number of hours of housework in one week fell.

In the first chart, the percentages of using refrigerator shot up rapidly to 90% between 1920 and 1960 and then it increased slightly, and which stayed unchanged after that. At the same time, people using vacuum cleaner started at 30%, which had a significant jump of by 70% in 4 decades later. The proportion of washing machine were not positive, it which fluctuated between 40% and 75% in the recorded period which in 1920 and 2019 range.

by

Overall, in the first line chart has upward trend at all. The second line chart has downward trend.

In With respect of to the first line chart, the washing machine fluctuated from 40 to 75% and it increased gradually by 35% between 1920 and 2019. Then, Concurrently, the refrigerator saw was a sharp growth from 0 to 100% between 1920 and 2000. Next, It remained unchanged in 2019. Finally, the vacuum cleaner started with 30% in 1920, which jump to 100% from 1920 to 2000. Subsequently, it plateaued in the remaining years There was unmoved in 2019.

As for the second line chart, the number of hours of housework per week experienced/saw/witnessed was a steady fall of 40 from 1920 to 2019.

Generally, triple three types of housework went are go up pretty sharply. Among them, that which shot up the most was shoot up is retrigerator.

In the first chart, we can see the improvement of the housekeeping in households activities. The most changed from 1920 to 1960 was is refrigerator by the sharply way, which soared fluctuate rapidly at about 0 to 90% and grow gradually belongs to the time before, to 100% which is the highest persentage of household with electrical appliances. The next striking change was that the line of vacuum cleaner, which grew steadily from by the straight way by 1920 to 1980. Finally the washing machine's line did not change too much, which fluctuated and started at 40% and finished at nearly 75%.

Overall, it is clear that the use of electrical appliances increased in every households from 1920-2019, especially from 1980-2019. Also in that period of time, the number of hours of housework declined superbly per week.

In 1920, the washing machine and the vacuum cleaner had similar rates of usage at around 30% and 40% respectively. Refrigerator had a lower percentages in the comparison with the two other appliances with nearly 0% of using. Over the next 60 years, the use of refrigerator and the vacuum cleaner had increased magnificently in turn of 100% and 90% accept apart from the washing machine, which fluctuated quite slightly and finally reached 65%. In the next 40 years period, the use of refrigerator remained steadily at 100% and also the rise of the vacuum cleaner to 100% as well. The washing machine after going up and went down from 1920 to 1980 started to grow negligibly to nearly 75% in the end of 2019.

Overall, the percentage of using electrical appliances from 1920 to 2019 was increased. However, the amount of time of hours of housework of per week was decrease.

In the first graph the percentage of households with electrical appliances using the refrigerator was significantly increased from 1920 to 1980. In 1920 the pepercentage of the people who used the refrigerator was 0% but in 1980 that percentage was 100%. Moreover, that percentage was stayed still from 1980 to 2019. The percentage of the vacuum cleaner was like the percentage of the refrigerator which was significantly increase from 1920 to 2000. In 1920 the percentage of the percentage of the vacuum cleaner was 30% but at 2000 the percentage was increased by 70%. However, the percentage of the washing machine was fluctuated but it still increased. At 1920 the percentage of washing machine was 40% and at 2019 that percentage was increase around 35%.

Overall, the first chart showed three electrical appliances had in there household was rocket.

From 1920 to 2000 the percentage of refrigerators was sky rocket from 0% to 100%. After 2000 to 2019 there was no more changes. And same with vacuum cleaner it rocket between 1920 to 2000 from 30% to 100%. And lastly is the washing machine it go up and down slightly every year but there is no special changes.

Overall, the citizens of Australia going to take coffee and tea in coffee shop is the favourite habits but buying fresh coffee is the least favourite habits of the citizens in last 4 weeks.

In Sydney people favourite habits in the last 4 weeks was going went to cafe for coffee and tea which was at 60%. Follow up Sydney is followed by Melbourne with 4% more when it comes to people habits is went to cafe for coffee and tea and as tall as Hobart percentage but only brisbane have less people going to cafe for coffee and tea and people in Adelaide is the least citizens went to coffee and tea with 49%. And the least favourite habits of Australia is buyingbought fresh coffee. In Sydney people who buy fresh coffee is middle of 40 to 45% under Sydney is Melbourne and horbart and the least citizens in the city who buy fresh coffee in Australia is Brisbane and Adelaide .

In general, citizens going to cafe coffe for tea or coffee drinking is the most popular habit in Australia. However fresh coffee is not as well known as others another in the Bar chart.

The proportion of people who drink coffee or tea at café in Melbourne and Hobart is the highest which at nearly 65 percent in the last 4 weeks. Follow that is Sydney which is 4% less than the data of Melbourne and Hobart. While instant coffee is not very popular famous in the same time. This is second choice in Hobart, at 53%, and at 47% and 45% in Melbourne and Sydney respectively. In comparison, in Sydney Melbourne and Hobart the figure fresh coffee is only half that of as much as the figure of resident going to the café.

In Brisbane and Adelaide, the figure of residents buying fresh coffee is the lowest/smallest,at the bottom lest well Know and they are equal at 34 percent. While instant coffee is are larger two times more popluar than these which in the range of 50 to 53 percent. Compared to other cities, drinking coffee and tea in café is the least popular, it at 55 percent and 49 percent in on Brisbane and Adelaide, respectively

Overall, the habit of people going to a cafe for coffee or tea, which had highest percentage in five Australian cities but it was second place in Adelaide . The lowest percentage was the habit of buying fresh coffee amongst five Australian cities.

With respect to the first 3 cities, First, the the people of Sydney had the habit of going to a cafe for coffee or tea , which was highest percentage with 60%. Then the habit of buying fresh coffee and instant coffee was at 44% and 46%. Next, the people of Melbourne had the habit of going to a cafe for coffee or tea, which was at 63%, which was and almost a twice than that of buying fresh coffee. In the same city, The habit of buying instant coffee was at 48%. Finally, in the people of Brisbane had the habit of buying fresh coffee, instant coffee and going to a cafe for coffee or tea had a figure of 35%, 53% and 55%, respectively. The habit of buying instant coffee was lower than that of going to a cafe for coffee and tea by with 2% and higher than that of buying fresh coffee by with 22%.

Overall, the percentage of people who went to a cafe for coffee or tea is the most popular in all five cities. However, the percentage of people who buy fresh coffee is not very popular amongst the with people of all five cities in Australia.

In Melbourne and Hobart, the percentage of people who went to a cafe for coffee or tea was around 64% but that habit in Sydney are just at 61%. Moreover, the percentage of people who bought fresh coffee is half of the percentage of people who went to a cafe for coffee or tea, and in Sydney and Melbourne at was around 44%and in Hobart that percentage was at 39%. However, the percentage of people who bought instant coffee in those three cities took second place after the percentage of people who went to a cafe for coffee or tea. Moreover, that percentage in Hobart was the highest with two other cities at 54%, and in Sydney and Melbourne the percentages respectively at 48% and 46%.

Overall, the most noticeable of all habits is going went to a café for coffee or tea . And the lowest data of all is brought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks.

In Autrailia and many other countries, there are large number of people buying and drinking coffee and tea. In comparison, Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide are having a common point, that the persentage of people going to a café is always nearly double with that of buying fresh coffee. Besides, Brisbane and Hobart virtually thrice. In Sydney, the habit of buying that brought instant coffee and buying fresh coffee are nearly similar with 44% and 46%. However in Brisbane, the number of people who bought fresh coffee is the lowest persentage of another amongst five cities at about 35%

Overall, the nutrients, which include sodium and saturated fats, are mostly eaten in the dinner is the highest percentage. However, the added sugar is mostly/mainly/primarily absorbed the highest percentage in the lunch.

With respect to the first two pie chart, First, 43% sodium and 37% saturated fats are mainly eaten in dinner. In breakfast, Sodium is absorbed 14% in breakfast, which is a lowest percentage than saturated fats. Then, Dinner is twice as large sodium as breakfast and snacks. Therefore, Breakfast is a same as snacks. 29% sodium is eaten in lunch, being a second place in the meals. The saturated fats are 21% and 26% in lunch and snacks.

As for the last pie chart, 42% added sugar is the highest in snacks, being

In general, the percentages of dinner accounts for the majority of all tree nutrients consumed by the American people, while snack contributes the least to all three charts

American consume sodium the most at dinner which accounts for 43 percent. Following that is are lunch dinner which formed 29 percent and is two times the proportion of than lunch snacks and breakfast both of which both are at 14 percent. Like sodium, saturated fat are used mostly at dinner which contributes to 37 percent and is nearly three times the data of than snack. Compared to other meals, the proportion of breakfast and snack just account for 24 percent and 16 percent of saturated fats consumed by American, respectively.