Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open, and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media (TV, newspapers, Internet). Do you agree with this view, or do you think that in some circumstances governments should limit the freedom of the media? by Ted

2024-07-16 02:51:25 UTC

I think information should be transparent, and the government should disclose this month's achievements, budget, and budget usage every month, which is conducive to strengthening people's supervision of the government, facilitating the efficient operation of the government, and benefiting people's livelihoods

2024-07-16 02:52:13 UTC

Agreed, restrictions are for better freedom。If freedom is freedom under the system, then the country will be stable。

2024-07-16 02:52:14 UTC

I don't agree with all disclosure if all information is made public sometimes it can create panic and it can cause social chaos and it can make people scared and it can lead to blind speculation but it should be made public to some extent to foster a sense of ownership and a sense of national identity

7m65grwgsm — 2024-07-16 02:52:15 UTC

Absolutely not.The information’s availability must be limited depending on it’s contents.

2024-07-16 02:52:41 UTC

2024-07-16 02:53:28 UTC

I think information should not be transparent, and some internal government matters should not be made known to the people, which is conducive to harmony and unity, and also convenient for handling. A sound confidentiality strategy helps to protect national secrets and is conducive to safeguarding national security

2024-07-16 02:54:06 UTC

Basic national information should be made public, citizens should be trained, and understanding national conditions is more conducive to national development

2024-07-16 02:54:26 UTC

In some circumstances ,government should limit the freedom of the media.

Maybe some decisions made by government has its special consideration, but the public misunderstands and disapprove of it , which will make it harder for government to maintain social stability.

2024-07-16 02:54:40 UTC

7m65grwgsm — 2024-07-16 02:54:41 UTC

Too much information opened to people and without selections would do harm to the society

2024-07-16 02:55:10 UTC

I think the information should be completely open.Many events can only reflect their urgency and importance if the data is open.If, like during an epidemic, there is no transparent number of infections for the public to know, people do not appreciate the importance of quarantine.This may keep the number of infections rising.

2024-07-16 02:55:20 UTC

我认为有必要把事情公之于众，比如涉及到普通百姓安全和利益的问题，但如果涉及到国家机密，就不能公开，以防其他国家派来的间谍危害我们的国家安全

7m65grwgsm — 2024-07-16 02:55:38 UTC

7m65grwgsm — 2024-07-16 03:16:00 UTC

Finished.

合影留念

2024-07-16 03:22:00 UTC