<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Lev Goldman USO by Lev</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq</link>
      <description>Made without much skill.</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-05-10 12:46:21 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-05-20 13:04:25 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Cold War Wiki</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/259590847</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-10 12:54:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/259590847</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dennis v. US Questions</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/259596889</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>How did the SCOTUS end up deciding that Dennis didn't have his first amendment right to free speech?<br><br>What precedent has this sent for cases since then?<br><br>The first amendment is one of the most defining aspect of our Constitution. How is this decision possible?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-10 13:08:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/259596889</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Drooly Thesis Presentation Notes</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/259603985</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Thesis can be:</strong></div><ul><li>The answer to a question you have posed.</li><li>The solution for a problem you have identified.</li><li>A statement that takes a position on a debatable topic.</li></ul><div><br><strong>Thesis Is:</strong></div><ul><li>A statement of the essay's topic &amp; points.</li><li>A sense of what the essay will be about.</li><li>One sentence.</li><li>NOT a 3 part thesis. It is a UNIVERSAL THESIS. The 3 part days are over.</li><li>At the end of the first paragraph.</li><li>A complete sentence.</li><li>Completely supported by the essay.</li></ul><div><br></div><div><strong>Introduction Paragraph:</strong></div><ul><li>Hook the dead fish.</li><li>Introduce the topic.</li><li>State the thesis.</li></ul><div><br>NO "YOU" NO "I" NO "WE" NO "ONE"<br>Formal 3<sup>rd</sup> person writing. The writer does not address the reader.<br><mark><br></mark><strong><em><mark>You are entitled to your own opinions. You are not entitled to your own facts.</mark></em></strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-10 13:24:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/259603985</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>TOPIC</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260300270</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong><mark>DENNIS v. US</mark></strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-14 01:18:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260300270</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Thoughts</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260300716</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>You might end up defending the decision. It would make an interesting paper.<br><mark><br>It is ridiculous that legislation from before 1973 is not digitized. The entire NYT articles back to the 1800s are. This is federal legislation. COME ON. Anyway, that's why you can't find the Smith Act on Loc.gov<br><br></mark><strong><em>THE ATHENAEUM IS AMAZING. GAAAAH</em></strong></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-14 01:20:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260300716</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sources Diving Board</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260300996</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Britannica Dennis v. US:<br><a href="https://www.britannica.com/event/Dennis-v-United-States">https://www.britannica.com/event/Dennis-v-United-States</a><br><br>Global Freedom of Expression:<br><a href="https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/dennis-v-united-states/">https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/cases/dennis-v-united-states/</a><br><br>Oyez Dennis v. US:<br><a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/341us494">https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/341us494</a><br><mark><br>Cornell Law Dennis v. US:<br></mark><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/341/494"><mark>https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/341/494</mark></a><mark><br><br>NYT 1951 Dennis v. US:</mark></div><ul><li><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1951/06/05/archives/the-smith-act-upheld.html">https://www.nytimes.com/1951/06/05/archives/the-smith-act-upheld.html</a></li><li><a href="https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1951/06/05/87046498.html">https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1951/06/05/87046498.html</a></li><li><a href="https://proxy.bostonathenaeum.org:2190/hnpnewyorktimes/docview/111959765/fulltextPDF/5D4D2D0377B4F97PQ/1?accountid=35416"><strong>https://proxy.bostonathenaeum.org:2190/hnpnewyorktimes/docview/111959765/fulltextPDF/5D4D2D0377B4F97PQ/1?accountid=35416</strong></a></li></ul><div><br>EBSCO Dennis v. US: <a href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=ers&amp;AN=95329605&amp;site=eds-live">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=ers&amp;AN=95329605&amp;site=eds-live</a><br><br>Interesting LoC PDF:<br><a href="http://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/77th-congress/session-1/c77s1ch432.pdf">http://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/77th-congress/session-1/c77s1ch432.pdf</a></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-14 01:22:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260300996</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Yates v. US</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260303535</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Intersting case dealing with impacts of Dennis v. US.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-14 01:38:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260303535</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Yates v. US Sources</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260303668</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/Yates-v-United-States">https://www.britannica.com/topic/Yates-v-United-States</a><br><br><a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1956/6">https://www.oyez.org/cases/1956/6</a></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-14 01:38:57 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260303668</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Assumptions &amp; Questions</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260434426</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-14 12:37:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260434426</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Smith Act</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260437901</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Really the foundation of Dennis v. US.<br><br><strong>Sources:<br></strong><a href="https://www.britannica.com/event/Smith-Act">https://www.britannica.com/event/Smith-Act</a><br><br><a href="http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=ers&amp;AN=95330348&amp;site=eds-live">http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=ers&amp;AN=95330348&amp;site=eds-live</a><br><br><a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385">https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385</a></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-14 12:46:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260437901</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Dennis Decision Notes</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260681091</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><a href="https://www.evernote.com/shard/s307/sh/693e49e3-0f65-45a2-8218-44488065723c/275c658b0132e1d1cdfb936c52580266">Notes </a>from the actual <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/341/494">decision </a>itself. You felt like a really good nerd reading it. You later described it as riveting. What is wrong with you?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-15 01:21:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/260681091</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Some Big Ideas</title>
         <author>lgoldman2020_1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/262171804</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Dennis decision was essentially that free speech isn't protected if it's about overthrowing the government.<br><br>Overthrowing the government is part of our founding documents. "When in the course of human events..."<br><br>2nd Amendment is largely interpreted as existing to guarantee that citizens could take up arms against their government if necessary. Also "petitioning the government for the redress of grievances" is additionally guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.<br><br>Dennis decision was not legally based, but politically motivated (although the SCOTUS is supposed to be a non-political safe house of government) by a cold war anti-communist fear.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-05-20 12:57:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/lgoldman2020_1/qc4twenbgdlq/wish/262171804</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
