<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>608 - Cautions for using student achievement results descriptively by Dr. S.</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/jscaglione/qc0qop43k1m1</link>
      <description>Made with magic</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-02-13 02:10:11 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-02-14 00:29:01 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Cautions</title>
         <author>jrobinson52</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/jscaglione/qc0qop43k1m1/wish/153595103</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Relationships- Isn't necessarily a correlation, this is a general type of analysis.<br><br>standard deviation- only makes sense with scores that are distributed normally. This is often confusing.&nbsp;<br><br>triangulation- difficult to combine different measures to understand proficiency&nbsp;<br><br>All in all, they are very situational.&nbsp;<br><br>Not the final means of assessing a student.&nbsp;<br><br>Don't let the terms (aka, Level 1, Level 2, etc...) be the definition of the group of students you are working with.&nbsp;<br><br>You're just as good as your assessment tool.&nbsp;<br>Be sure to take your time understanding the data.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-02-13 23:53:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/jscaglione/qc0qop43k1m1/wish/153595103</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
