a)    What is ‘The Trolley Problem’? 

The trolley is on the track running with the speed of 60 miles per hour and the brakes of trolley are not working and the trolley is not stopping and within some distance there are five workers working on the track and if the trolley is not stopped they all will die due to the accident and their nothing which the driver can do.

b)    If you are the driver of the trolley car, what would you choose to do and why?

As in the given scenario where we can either save one person by letting the trolley move towards the five workers or the rest of the five workers by steering the trolley towards the one person, If I were the driver of the trolley car I would have steered the trolley car towards the one person and saved the life of the other five workers as saving lives of five worker by losing life of one worker would be far more better than saving only one life by killing five other in a situation where I had no control over the situation and some or the other has to sacrifice their life.

c)     What if all five workers on the track are convicts and the one person on the sidetrack is an honest, hardworking man?

In this given situation where the brakes of the trolley is not working and in some distance there are five workers working and on a diversion there is single worker working and we have been given a choice to save five workers or one worker by steering our trolley, where all the five workers are convicts and the other person is an honest and hardworking man I will definitely try to save the single worker by steering the trolley towards the other five workers as it would be completely wrong to save convicts by sacrificing the life of an honest and hardworking man.

d)    What if all five workers on the track are terminally ill and the one on the sidetrack is perfectly healthy?

In this situation where the five workers working on tracks who are terminally ill and on the other diversion one perfectly healthy worker is working and we can save either of them by steering are trolley either towards the five terminally ill workers or towards the single healthy worker I will definitely save the single healthy person as the terminally ill worker will ultimately die in short span of time so saving the healthy person would definitely be a more viable option.

If Cinderella were a boy instead of being a girl, then in the story, Cinderella would not have been treated the way she was treated as a boy because of the gender bias which used to prevail in our society. Nowadays, we can see gender bias but now people have slowly started releasing gender equality. There would have been a lot of change in the story. As a boy, she could not go to the ball or marry the prince. Also, she had no fairy would come to help her or her stepsister would never dare to call her a mess as they used to call her. 

The story portrays behaviour of various character in the story like how Cinderella who used to be ill-treated by her stepmother and was forced to do all the household works but still used to be kind to everyone and her this kindness was clearly rewarded in the story when she wanted to get to the ball but was not allowed by her stepmother and later fairy came and helped her to reach the ball and then she reached the ball and the prince liked her, danced her and when she ran away from the ball he looked for her and the eventually married her and on the other hand her stepsister who used to mock her and make fu of her were punished as the prince rejected them.

In my personal opinion the author through Cinderella tried to show that how kind and generous women are like Cinderella who was ill-treated by her stepmother was always mocked by her step sister's, had to work like a maid all day but she never said a single bad word to her stepmother or her sister also showed other relations, like Cinderella with her stepsister or with her stepmother, but according to me The author believes that women are kind hearted and generous.

In this female centric story, they’re not much that we can infer but the way prince searched for Cinderella in the town and married her shows that the story tries to promote the fact that it's not that always women who have to bent towards men but men should also bend towards women and treat them equally. The stereotype which this story reinforces is the way a powerful prince had the opportunity to select the women he wants to get married had it been a poor guy no one would marry him.

Shashi from the Hindi movie English Vinglish is a worthy role model as this character shows how an Indian homemaker who sell snacks and is mocked by everyone for not knowing English goes on to learn English and how she broke several stereotypes and gains confidence.

No, I do not believe that a person may live 14000 years because this is not a natural phenomenon. Also, according to John Oldman, the sole talent he possesses is the ability to not age, although ageing is not the only cause of death. People die for a variety of reasons, including diseases, accidents, and much more, and John Oldman being protected from all of these things for 14000 years is something I will never believe because, as a rational thinker, the biggest question that comes to mind is how he could survive all of the calamities that would have occurred in 14000 years. When the Protagonist revealed that he is Jesus, the plot became increasingly irrelevant to me.

Edith, a devout Christian, was the most suspicious of all the guests at the farewell party, for the simple reason that she was a devout Christian, and when the protagonist told everyone that he was Jesus, it was obvious that she did not liked, She had no interest in what John Oldman was saying as she thought he was insane, after a point she even tried to go back to her home as she did not enjoy what John Oldman said.

 

 In Opposition

 
The Famous Web series Tandav was accused for hurting the sentiments of the Hindu community as in one of its episodes the actor Mohd Zeeshan Ayyub was dressed like god shiv and was seen using absurd language due to which I faced a lot of criticism from the community. FIR was filed against the makers, actors faced a lot of backlash, Ban Tandav campaign was started and Haryana Home Minister Anil Vij even released a statement that it should be taken down from amazon prime. Due to all this information and broadcasting minister asked the makers and amazon prime for a complete explanation.

 In favour

 
In response to all the controversy which happened with the web series the makers of the series released an apology to all the people whose sentiments were hurt. They said that they had no intention of hurting anyone’s religious sentiment and all that happened was just coincidental. The maker released an apology on the social media stating that the actors and crew had no intention of hurting anyone's feelings, caste, community, race, faith, or religious beliefs, or insulting or outraging any organization, political party, or living or deceased individual. "The cast and crew of 'Tandav' respect the public's concerns and express their sincere regret if they have inadvertently hurt anyone's sentiments."

This is a scene from the famous web series The Big Bang theory where reductio-ad absurdum was used.

Reductio-ad-absurdum- Disproving an argument by showing an absurdity to which it leads when carried to its logical conclusion.

To make Sheldon's argument look wrong, Leonardo mocks Sheldon's justification for why pennies shouldn't stay with them. Leonardo's rebuttal is not an argument in and of itself, but it ultimately convinces Sheldon of his insanity.