The whole context of ¨The Help¨ movie is focused on the racism, even when the story is developed in a long time ago, on my opinion this is a historical problematic specially in the United States, this whole situation involves social and cultural contexts from the people and community on the region.

Movie showcases several social problematics around the racism on the United States, nevertheless; this specific scene exposes a general service worker (Minnie) that is in need of the toilet inside the house, situation that is a problem for the owner and boss of Minnie since she doesn’t feel comfortable with her using the toilet inside her house. The previous reveals the extreme racism by the owner and the wrong ideas she had about Afro-American people only because of the fact of their skin color. She had the wrong idea that Minnie could get her or her family ¨infected¨ of any kind of ¨weird disease¨ and this drove her to commit a complete unfair and racist act against her employee.

On the other side Minnie, tired of her boss abuses and encouraged by the fact of her self-knowledge, proud of her identity and herself decided to commit an act of protest and even when she knew she was not allow to do it decided to pretend to use the toilet, this empowerment of course annoyed her boss and she decided to fire Minnie.

On an individual interpretation; I could say this scene can be seen from three different perspectives; First one, from the point of view of the boss, representation of power, abuse and selfishness, her privileged position doesn’t allow her to note people around her and at the same time her ignorance drives her to commit acts that at a first glance are very questionable, the real problem with it, is that when this kind of behaviors become massive and include more people creates a big social problematic where a group of people is against another. Second point of view would be the grandma; she is sitting there watching the whole scene and speaks up showing her disagreement on the boss statement, she tries to help but she doesn’t make a big effort to stop the situation, this could be because she has not the enough interest, because the situation doesn’t affect her directly or simply because she knows she could not change anything, her position is also reflected on the way a community acts in presence of an unfair and abuse event. Third point of view is the victim’s view; we can see three reactions from Minnie, this reactions progressively change according on the situation development. At the beginning Minnie tries to let her urgency for the toilet pass which reflects how she is used to put herself in last position with the intention to not affect others, however; once the grandma interferes on her behalf, she starts to feel empowered realizing and reminding her own value as a human being, this feeling raised with a hint of discomfort when her boss tries to minimize her needs and shows an insensitive attitude, here is when she decides to act for herself and in a brave and empowered way she uses the toilet ignoring her boss’ orders. At the end Minnie chooses herself, her pride and her selflove even when she knows this could be a challenging situation for her and her children.

Since ancient times we have witnessed of the racism, inequality and injustice within our societies, even though as humanity we have progressed and things have improved, we still can see acts of racism, in United States specifically this is a big problematic yet and people have raised against it several times, nevertheless, when we see specific cases the continuous racism is evident not only against African-American people but also against another identities and ways of think. The best that people living in the Usa could do is to stand up just as Minnie did, with protest acts that doesn’t affect any other people and reminding always our worth as human beings.

The bathroom scene in The Pursuit of Happyness shows one of the hardest moments in Chris’s life. Right there, the movie makes us feel the clash between hope and despair. It’s not only about his personal fight, but also about a bigger issue: poverty and homelessness in a country that promises the “American Dream.”

At that point, Chris appears completely vulnerable. With no job and no home, he has no choice but to spend the night in a subway restroom with his little boy. As the child sleeps in his arms, Chris tries not to cry. What hurts him most is knowing he cannot give his son a safe and decent place to stay.

This part of the film is heartbreaking. It shows a father at his lowest point, but it also pushes us to reflect on society and how it treats those who are struggling. Honestly, it’s impossible to watch this scene without feeling his pain.

From a cultural perspective, this scene really brings out the two faces of the so-called American Dream. On one side, there’s the popular idea that if you work hard enough and keep going, you can eventually make it. On the other side, Chris’s reality shows us that things are not so simple. Unemployment, poverty, and a weak safety net create walls that many people simply cannot climb, no matter how hard they try.

The story takes place in the early 1980s, during a period when the U.S. was dealing with a tough economic recession and unemployment was on the rise. In cities like San Francisco, more and more families ended up homeless, and that struggle often went unnoticed. Watching Chris’s story, it’s clear that what we see on screen is not just one man’s bad luck, it mirrors the lives of many families who lived through the same harsh reality.

Personally, this is what makes the scene so powerful. It’s not only about Chris and his son, but also about the bigger picture: a society that preaches opportunity while leaving many behind.

On a social level, this scene clearly exposes job insecurity and exclusion. Chris is a smart and determined man, yet without real opportunities he ends up pushed into desperation. Having to sleep in a public restroom is not just a sign of poverty, it’s also a symbol of being left aside, of how institutions fail to protect those who are most vulnerable.

At the same time, the film reminds us of something deeper: the strength that comes from family and paternal love. The way Chris hugs his son, holding him tight to keep him safe, is heartbreaking and powerful at the same time. For me, that moment says more than words ever could. It shows love, protection, and sacrifice in their purest form.

When we look at cultural values, this bathroom scene highlights resilience and perseverance as part of what many see as the American spirit. Seeing Chris crying on the floor might seem like total defeat, but in reality it marks a turning point. Even in his lowest moment, he refuses to let go of his dream or his role as a father.

This message ties in with the cultural idea of self-reliance and the ability to start over. At the same time, the scene makes us think about something deeper: is personal effort really enough to break free from poverty, or does it take bigger changes in the way society and the economy are structured?

For me, that’s what makes this moment so powerful. It’s both inspiring and uncomfortable, it celebrates individual strength, but it also forces us to question the limits of that belief.

In conclusion, the bathroom scene is not only about Chris Gardner’s struggle, but also a reflection of wider social problems. It shows how poverty and homelessness can take away a person’s dignity, even in a country that calls itself “the land of opportunity.”

At the same time, the scene underlines values like sacrifice, love, and hope. I believes, it serves as a reminder that the search for a better life is not just a personal journey, it is also something we share as a society.

What makes this scene so strong is the contrast it creates: the cultural dream of success against the harsh reality of exclusion. That tension is what turns this moment into more than just a dramatic episode; it becomes a powerful way to reflect on how film connects stories, cultural identity, and social issues.

In this scene, we see a meeting between two union representatives, two female workers, and executives from the Ford automobile company. The meeting is discussing the women's demands for fair wages and similar working hours, as women are required to work overtime. In this part of the film, it is evident that the men were arguing about what to do to reach an agreement without taking the workers' opinions into account. The company executives' main objective was for them to continue working and forget about the process in which women were fighting for their rights. The protagonist, Rita O'Grady, witnesses this situation and inadvertently intervenes, explaining why they deserve a decent wage according to the work they do at the company. She also tells the executives that they will go on a 24-hour strike.

This short excerpt is from the film "Made in Dagenham" (2010). It is based on true events. It tells the story of a group of women who worked at the Ford automobile company in England in 1968. Their job was to assemble car seats. They received lower wages than their male colleagues, even though the work was equally valuable. The company's strategy was to tell the women that they were not qualified to do the work of sewing seats and other car parts, but that they would be hired at a wage commensurate with their knowledge and skills, which was insignificant compared to that of the men.

The women, noticing this circumstance, choose a colleague to represent them in the union, and thus, the protagonist, Rita O'Grady, decides to lead the strike to demand equal pay and better working conditions. In this way, this movement challenges company policies and also pushes for a change in labor standards in the United Kingdom, as the protests that took place were quite controversial, with the media even reporting on what happened. Thus, the strikes and protests served to lead to the passage of the Equal Pay Act of 1970 in the United Kingdom. This law establishes that both men and women must receive the same pay according to the activities they perform. These events not only favored the change in standards but also left a positive impact on community awareness, as they recognize the importance of social equality and that through struggle, perseverance, and teamwork, significant changes can be achieved that benefit a large number of people, not just personal interests.

The film portrays the reality experienced by women in the 1990s, where they didn't play a fundamental role in the workplace or in academia. It was believed that women should only be responsible for household chores. This type of thinking promoted sexism and patriarchy, leading women in companies to work overtime and perform difficult tasks for very low wages.

Furthermore, in addition to not enjoying equal pay, women in the 1990s were subject to a fairly strict regime. They were barred from voting, divorce, and dress code. Depending on the culture, for example, in Europe, women were prohibited from wearing pants in public, even leading to arrest. Women were not allowed to manage household assets or sign contracts without their husbands' permission. They were barred from jobs in mines or heavy industries, from serving in the military, or from participating in combat roles. Their participation was limited to auxiliary or nursing roles. They were barred from high-level political or administrative positions, and from careers such as medicine or engineering.

All of these oppressions varied according to the country and the culture of the territory. It was through the various events that have developed over the years that women's rights have also been promoted as important within society. The first major event, arguably, occurred in 1848 in the United States, at the "Seneca Falls Convention." This was a public event where men and women discussed equal rights for the first time. Through unity and constant struggle, women have increasingly been considered for voting and for holding high-ranking political positions. They have also been given the opportunity to access education, among other things.

Through this struggle, women have raised awareness among both men and women, which has led young people, generation after generation, to have a more flexible mindset and to stop following ideas that women must be subject to different rules or cultural norms. In this way, cases of gender violence, wage inequality, and sexist stereotypes have significantly decreased. This has allowed the role of women to be valued, for example, in areas such as art, science, and so on.

It could be argued that thanks to women uniting to protest and demand their rights, this has led to changes in the social and cultural spheres, fostering the creation of inclusive mindsets and redefining cultural identity in terms of gender and equity. Things have changed significantly over the years, as women today enjoy significant benefits they didn't have years ago.

It's important to emphasize that even when things are going well, it's extremely important to continue promoting gender equality to end various stigmas that devalue women's role within society.

The "Run, Forrest, Run!" Scene

One of the most iconic scenes in the film is "Run, Forrest, run!", which contains three valuable lessons: social commentary, personal growth, and a metaphor for life. The scene shows Forrest being chased by children who make fun of him because of his leg braces, but when he starts running, he breaks free from the braces and runs so fast that he outpaces his pursuers. This scene is a powerful symbol of the possibility of overcoming physical and social limitations.

The scene reflects social commentary on discrimination and the exclusion of people for being different. Society tends to judge and exclude those who do not conform to established standards, but Forrest demonstrates that being different is not an obstacle to progress. By running, Forrest becomes very fast and develops skills that allow him to participate in activities and sports, proving that it is possible to succeed despite difficulties.

The scene also shows Forrest's personal growth, as he transforms his weakness into strength. By being able to run, Forrest empowers himself and demonstrates that he can do what he sets his mind to. This is an example of how people can overcome their limitations and achieve their goals through perseverance and dedication.

The "Run, Forrest, Run!" scene is also a metaphor for life. Life is a journey full of obstacles and challenges, but with determination and perseverance, it is possible to overcome them and achieve our goals. The scene reminds us that we should not let limitations and prejudices define us, but rather find ways to overcome them and reach our full potential.

Throughout the film, Forrest demonstrates a wide range of positive values, such as innocence, kindness, resilience, love, and loyalty. These values ​​are fundamental to the film's narrative and remind us of the importance of living with integrity and compassion. The film shows us that, despite difficulties and obstacles, it is possible to live a full and meaningful life.

In conclusion, the film "Forrest Gump" is a cinematic masterpiece that reminds us of the importance of values ​​and social commentary. The scene with the iconic phrase "Run, Forrest, run!" is a powerful symbol of the possibility of overcoming physical and social limitations, and it reminds us that we should not let limitations and prejudices define us. The film is an example of how people can overcome their limitations and achieve their goals through perseverance and dedication.

INDIVIDUAL ANALYSIS

This song contains a narrative that is quite representative, one might say globally, in English-speaking demonstrations. It was written during a time of tension and war, along with all the social and political conflict. This melody becomes a peaceful, unifying anthem, in which we can imagine a world without division, without war, without material differences, achieving a humanistic effect.

Historical-Sociocultural Context:
This song was composed around 1971, a highly charged time of the Cold War and the civil rights struggle in the United States. Music became a vehicle for political messages and the expression of ideas. John Lennon, a member of the Beatles, channeled a critique of the violent and unequal structure of the time through this melody. From Philip Riley's (2007) perspective, language is the medium through which culture and identity are constructed. In this case, Lennon used language as a symbol. Similarly, Da Silva Sinha et al. (2020) emphasize that cultural expressions such as music are like signs of life that sustain a collective identity, promoting intercultural empathy, which highlights the value and global impact of this song.

Outline - Cultural Themes and Values:
- Global solidarity and peace
- Criticism of social, political, and religious divisions
- Ethical unity without borders
- Postmodern British culture open to change and reflection
Representation of Social Norms:
- Questioning established norms such as nationalism and materialism
- Emphasizes a cooperative and egalitarian vision
- Reflects on the dominant values ​​of capitalist society and their global impact
Implications for Cultural Identity:
- Imagine becomes a global British projection, making music a culture
- The English language is a vehicle of hope
- As Riley (2007) suggests, this song develops the idea of ​​shared values, just as Da Silva Sinha et al. (2020) proposes, it is a narrative that sustains symbolic expression around universal human values.

Written Analysis:
This song, titled "Imagine," contains a powerful narrative about the culture and ideals of unity and peace of English-speaking society in the 1970s. It develops in a rather reflective and poetic tone, proposing ideas such as the destruction of borders, which is a confrontation with the social structure that has long divided humanity. Language takes on a different role than just communication; it becomes an element of expression for values ​​and ideals. In this song, English acquires a symbolic attribute, acting as a tool for cultural resistance and mutual understanding (Philip Riley, 2007). This ethnolinguistic approach demonstrates how language can shape collective identities and generate bonds of belonging.

Additionally, language and culture embody the human experience. As proposed by Da Silva Sinha et al. (2020), this narrative is used as a symbol of hope and social transformation. It creates a culturally distinct identity and paves the way for a human and empathetic perspective. The song's simple approach articulates a utopian vision that reflects on values ​​and global coexistence. It represents how art can nuance society by projecting ideals to the world. "Imagine" is a linguistic expression, a vehicle, an identity, and a union for social transformation.