https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk By: Tayden Xayakoummane en-us 2020-08-30 23:44:22 UTC 2024-10-14 02:41:13 UTC hello@padlet.com taxay003 https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707641692  “To say that the government has an interest in encouraging proper treatment of the flag, however, is not to say that it may criminally punish a person for burning a flag as a means of political protest.” (Page 1, Lines 3-6)]]> 2020-08-31 00:01:04 UTC https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707641692 taxay003 https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707658564 “The ultimate irony would have been to punish views expressed by burning the flag that stands for the right to these expressions.” (Page 3, Lines 66-68)]]> 2020-08-31 00:17:44 UTC https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707658564 taxay003 https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707662119 As they might seem the same, one is a little different from each other. From Texas v. Johnson, it is saying that you should not arrest people for burning a flag because it was for a political protest. They also point out that you shouldn’t compare two things that shouldn’t be compared.As for the other text, it explains that people may have different feelings/viewpoints on the topic, and for their views, it would be ironic to punish them for burning the flag.]]> 2020-08-31 00:21:12 UTC https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707662119 taxay003 https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707675340 "Any messages that burning the flag might convey easily can be communicated in other ways." (Page 1, Lines 17-19)]]> 2020-08-31 00:32:26 UTC https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707675340 taxay003 https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707687458 The quote from "American Flag Stands for Tolerance" supports it's tone because it explains that instead of having to burn the flag to express your differences/beliefs, you should do them in a way that doesn't have to do with the flag. The quote from the Texas v. Johnson supports it's tone because it proves that even if you were to burn the American Flag, you will not be punished, however, if yoh have a flag, it isn't worth burning.]]> 2020-08-31 00:42:11 UTC https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707687458 taxay003 https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707700332 ". . . Forbidding criminal punishment for conduct such as Johnson's will not endanger the special role played by our flag or the feelings it inspires." (Page 1, Lines 14-16)]]> 2020-08-31 00:51:19 UTC https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707700332 taxay003 https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707816794 In the text, it says that ". . . the flag's deservedly cherished place in our community will be strengthened, not weakened. . ." (Page 2, Line 36-38)

]]> 2020-08-31 02:26:55 UTC https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707816794 taxay003 https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707825366 "The American flag is a cherished symbol of our national aspirations. It is the closest object to a national icon, rivaled only by the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence." (Page 1, Lines 10-13)]]> 2020-08-31 02:34:23 UTC https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707825366 taxay003 https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707833303 Texas v. Johnson uses cause and effect to explain that their community will keep growing, since the incident of the flag burning occured. "The Flag Stands for Tolerance" uses more powerful words to show that the flag is sacred, and people shouldn't burn something sacred to the US. The picture for Texas v. Johnson shows that burning the American flag will symbolize their community getting stronger. The picture for “The Flag Stands for Tolerance” shows that the flag is sacred, but there are other ways to show the world how you feel (fits for tone 2 as well).]]> 2020-08-31 02:40:28 UTC https://padlet.com/taxay003/q53834fvesrrgplk/wish/707833303