<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Treating the Unknown by Mr. Rice</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/pw7hznpns5ki</link>
      <description>by Sun Jay Yoo</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-01-30 14:26:07 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-08-03 17:43:46 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Treating the Unknown</title>
         <author>apush1718</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/pw7hznpns5ki/wish/150234561</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Sun Jay You</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovgDmBClD2o" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-30 14:28:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/pw7hznpns5ki/wish/150234561</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Chandler Connick</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/pw7hznpns5ki/wish/150407515</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Research Design (3) I thought the researcher thoroughly explained his project and showed his conclusions and understanding well&nbsp;<br>2. Establish argument (6) this presentation was very well organized and scholarly&nbsp;<br>3. Reflect (3) the researcher was very thorough in his explanation of his research project<br>4. Engage the audience (6) the student was easy to listen to and very articulate <br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-30 22:38:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/pw7hznpns5ki/wish/150407515</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Wesley Sullivan 1.Research Design (3) The presenter discussed his research question, methodology, and conclusion in great detail even giving the steps and missteps he took along the way. 2. Establish Argument (6) The dude had a whole section dedicated to discussing the significance and implications of his findings. 3.Reflect (3) As mentioned before in part 1 of the rubric, he dedicated a good bit of time to explaining his steps and missteps and seen in the revision of his method flow chart. 4.Engage Audience (4) While he was articulate his gestures were often unnecessary and did not enhance the communication of the argument </title>
         <author>apush1718</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/apush1718/pw7hznpns5ki/wish/150504927</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-01-31 13:12:59 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/apush1718/pw7hznpns5ki/wish/150504927</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
