Evaluation of Web Sources by Helen https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10 FYS: The Creative Process en-us 2017-10-12 20:11:33 UTC 2023-03-14 19:00:10 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/File.png hengge2005 https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196813359 https://stocktonfilmnoir.wordpress.com/2010/10/29/a-close-analysis-of-the-opening-shot-from-touch-of-evil/

http://offscreen.com/view/touch_evil

]]> 2017-10-13 13:53:58 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196813359 Reliability https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890023 the first one is not reliable because it is opinion based. the second one is reliable because it comes from an authoritative source on the subject and uses lots of sources to back up their paper.]]> 2017-10-13 16:35:29 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890023 "Touch of Evil: A Cognitivist Approach" can be considered, at a glance, a fairly reliable source. It has an extensive bibliography, and was published relatively recently. There is also a link to a bio about the author, Benjamin Paquette, providing his credentials and previous experience. https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890127 2017-10-13 16:35:44 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890127 Evaluation: https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890277 Offscreen.com: This is a reliable source due to the fact that it gives critical information that is needed to properly cite a source (such as the author's name, it's volume number, word count, date of publication, etc). It is also filled with fact-based information and claims that are supported by other outside sources and details.
Stock Film Noir (Wordpress): Wordpress.com is a blogging website, so considering that this article was written by "TeamEvan", who openly depicts himself as a college student (and definitely isn't very reliable with what he's saying), he's definitely not the best choice for research.]]> 2017-10-13 16:36:04 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890277 Thingy about Reliability yaaaaaaaaaaaay rhodes_jksn https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890376 That first one with the longer link isn't all that reliable because most of the information is written subjectively. That second source though? So reliable man it's objective and dope]]> 2017-10-13 16:36:24 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890376 https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890578

Touch of Evil: A Cognitivist Approach is reputable because the author has credentials as a filmmaker, and the analysis takes an objective approach. The "analysis" on Wordpress is less reliable, as the author only focuses on one shot in the film, provides no credentials, and approaches the topic subjectively.

]]> 2017-10-13 16:36:56 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890578 A touch of Evil: Cognitivist Approach https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890818 Is a very reliable source because it touches on the aspect of several production and angles.]]> 2017-10-13 16:37:38 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890818 Link 2 on Off Screen provides a list of links that the author conducted research from. Link 1 is simply an opinion based homework assignment. https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890952 2017-10-13 16:38:00 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196890952 Stockton film noir one is not reliable because it doesn't come from authoritative source, but the other one is written by credible authors https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196891245 2017-10-13 16:38:52 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196891245 "Analysis" https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196891361 The fact that no doubt this is someone reading into the open scene of a movie, one of the most important moments of a movie. There is also no doubt this is a personalized opinion of this scene and this movie rather than a logical one.]]> 2017-10-13 16:39:11 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196891361 hey guys what we writin again i forgot rhodes_jksn https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196891467 2017-10-13 16:39:27 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196891467 Off-Screen https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196891500 Touch of Evil: A Cognitivist Approach]]> 2017-10-13 16:39:31 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196891500 Yo add me on twitter https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892064 @MDubravski

]]> 2017-10-13 16:41:03 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892064 real quick can you spell icup out loud rhodes_jksn https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892109 2017-10-13 16:41:09 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892109 Joke https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892418 2017-10-13 16:41:55 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892418 https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892911

]]> 2017-10-13 16:43:13 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892911 https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892995 2017-10-13 16:43:23 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196892995 https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196893325

]]> 2017-10-13 16:44:09 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196893325 https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196893414 2017-10-13 16:44:18 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196893414 https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196893746 2017-10-13 16:44:54 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196893746 https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196893991 2017-10-13 16:45:36 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196893991 https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196894035 HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN:

]]> 2017-10-13 16:45:44 UTC https://padlet.com/hengge2005/fys10/wish/196894035