As in Mother Nature there are exceptions of living beings that are not attacked, so too in science class laboratories.

Using frogs that must have been deprived of life to be opened, or even a small mouse, is something that shouldn't happen, since they also have a life, and there are better ways to learn from them.

For example: Have one animal for the entire class and care for them together, collaborate as a team, and then record their behaviors, then go online and watch a video of someone performing a dissection. I agree with the learning of the organism of animals, but not at the cost of their suffering.

Should our schools use animals in science classes?

yes, students should be able to use animals in science classes. One reason I say that students should be able to use animals in science classes is because in science you're supposed to learn how certain different bodies work, how different every animals immune system is and how they learn to adapt in different habitations. Not only that but students can also learn how an animal died, this also helps students who want to have a career in animal health and benefit them by already having some experience. So yes, I believe that students should be allowed to use animals in science classes to help them learn more about different species.

In my opinion our schools shouldn't use animals in science classes because it seems inhumane to me that they use innocent animals to do things that they can do in other ways, for example, they can teach it with drawings or show a video. Furthermore, "Although this means is very educational, some people overlook the unethical practice that is involved. Dissection is basically harming the body of a dead animal without consent of the animal when alive. Some animal activists feel that this practice should be banned from the classroom and replaced immediately". This shows us that learning with animals is something that helps you learn but is inhumane. Finally, in my opinion, I think all schools should stop teaching how to use animals as an educational tool and start looking for other ways to teach students.

I believe that animals should not be used in science classes to experiment with them because if they are alive, they can often be used more than once and the animals suffer a lot due to the reactions they may have how the video the of "save Ralph" In that video you can see how animals are used for various experiments and they suffer a lot of pain due to the reactions.

In my opinion, animals should be used for practice in science class, as they are a tool that can help students learn a lot. This allows students to see anatomy, physiology, and other aspects that they can learn by practicing with animals. An example would be that some schools dissect frogs for their biology classes. This allows students to see and touch the frog's organs and learn how organs or organic systems like the cardiovascular system function, an experience that cannot be replaced by videos or images. Also, thanks to these classes, there could be people interested in the subject and the possibility of creating future professionals such as doctors or veterinarians.

In my opinion the school should not use animals for science classes because I think that if the school used animals in science classes, that class could become unpleasant for many students. In addition, animals are living beings that suffer when, for example, they are used to test medications, makeup, or other chemicals. although on the other hand maybe they should use animals but not alive oOn the other hand, perhaps they should use animals, but not alive ones, since we could learn about the effects that some medications or other chemicals could have on our bodies.

In my opinion, schools should not use animals in classrooms. There are other ways students can learn about animals. For example, videos and pictures. Schools would be wasting money on animals every year.