<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Siomara Segura Soc 448 News Journal by Siomara Segura</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2019-09-12 03:23:43 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-01-21 20:03:13 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>&quot;you can keep some of the people down some of the time, and most of the people down most of the time, but you can’t keep all of the people down all of the time.” </title>
         <author>siomarap5</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/384209922</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Powerful statement that is logical. Based on an article found in the economist return from Gilead. Margaret Atwood wrote a book and explains in this article all the actions taken by women who portray a book named "The Handmaids Tale" it refers to women's oppression. Women dress in special clothing that represents  without any verbal interactions what they symbolize. The article states that Ms. Atwood believes while we were turning in the 21st century towards equality we are now turning backwards. It involves politics and politicians who promise a better future but not for everyone.                          The sequel to “The Handmaid’s Tale” explores the workings of repression</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-09-15 01:31:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/384209922</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> Post #2 (September 12,2019)  https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/09/26/a-tax-hike-threatens-the-health-of-japans-economy</title>
         <author>siomarap5</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/393153002</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Stocks and scares is the title of this article that encompasses international events that produce more income to certain areas, In Japan for example no tax is popular but consumption tax has an unusually fraught history. The article gives an example of how much booze is hold in local bars where World cups are held. Small businesses run out of alcohol because of the high increase of people visiting while following their favorite team. I found this very interesting because you just assume the amount of people entering different countries not realizing that they may not accommodate everyones needs. This incoming could support different countries by allowing more people to consume and help support the economy in that particular country for a short period. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-03 16:58:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/393153002</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #3 (September 25,2019)  https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/10/10/how-singapore-stands-to-gain-from-hong-kongs-troubles</title>
         <author>siomarap5</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/396271658</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This article reminds me of how other countries can gain and what they can obtain when country is having a difficult time in the economy.When someone is in hardships another will prosper. Singapore using the failure that hong king is having to regain the shipping hub and commercial inventories on the coast of Asian. It open its doors to more tourist Singapore saw an increase of 4% on the other hand in Hong Kong they saw a decrease of 39%. Tourist contribute to more availability and therefore access to opportunities. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/405288937/565ca32d88770caaaae949f25265e12e/drawing.png" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-10 16:29:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/396271658</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #4 (October 11,2019) Inflation</title>
         <author>siomarap5</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/396886209</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I chose this article because of its graphs and how it discusses inflation, in the first part of the article explains the differences of how in the 1970s inflation was about introducing the WIN. Todays policies are more so to benefit the higher beneficiary. Selected countries market capitalism by distributing a percentage. An interesting point in one of the graphs was measuring the population and its livelihood. For example Englewood’s population is 25,000, nearly 40% smaller than in 2000, as people have fled violence, poverty and poor housing. This suggested that using life expectancy in a state that is experiencing high levels of disparity can result in shorter lives. This can relate to many aspects of population contribution to development and economics.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/10/11/inflation-whipped" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-11 20:46:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/396886209</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Post #5 (October 14, 2019)    </title>
         <author>siomarap5</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/397711964</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The ongoing trade and changes that are all over the news presently are about China's exports and imports and how our president reflects on these topics. China is one of the primary sources that United States has benefitted from with their growth economically the gap between non negotiations and conflicts is rising. The GDP is measurable when referring to the benefits both countries receive by the exchanges of goods. Profitable exchanges and growth prospectives makes this topic at the center of the economics. Although some of the exchanges between countries involves interactions and promises like the Chinese government’s promise to purchase $40-50bn of agricultural products should help American farmers (assuming that the sales happen at a sufficiently high price). Tis does not mean it will see better outcomes for future reproductive possibility.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2019/10/12/a-mini-truce-between-america-and-china-has-investors-feeling-hopeful" />
         <pubDate>2019-10-15 02:43:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/siomarap5/pl86jm2hv71u/wish/397711964</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
